Zach Root
P Great Lakes Loons| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 19 | 19 | 76 | 3.54 | 2.67 | 32.1% | 11.2% | — | K 25.0% · BB 12.8% · FIP 3.64 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBLAD | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.31 | 4.31 | 23.6% | 9.6% | 0.1 | |
| 2028PROJ45% MLB | 24 | MLBLAD | 8 | 8 | 47 | 4.31 | 4.26 | 24.0% | 9.0% | 0.7 | |
| 2029PROJ68% MLB | 25 | MLBLAD | 13 | 13 | 75 | 4.25 | 4.20 | 24.3% | 8.7% | 1.1 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 19 | 19 | 76 | 321 | 103 | 36 | 5 | 100% | 4.0 | 25.0% | 12.8% | 12.2% | 1.9% | 3.54 | 3.64 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 19 | 19 | 76 | 321 | 103 | 36 | 5 | 100% | 4.0 | 25.0% | 12.8% | 12.2% | 1.9% | 3.54 | 3.64 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 19 | 19 | 76 | 321 | 103 | 36 | 5 | 100% | 4.0 | 32.1% | 11.2% | 20.9% | 1.6% | 3.54 | 2.67 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | LAD | 1 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 4.0 | 23.6% | 9.6% | 14.0% | 2.9% | 4.31 | 4.31 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | LAD | 19 | 19 | 105 | 442 | 106 | 40 | 13 | 100% | 5.5 | 24.0% | 9.0% | 15.0% | 2.9% | 4.24 | 4.19 | +1.5 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | LAD | 19 | 19 | 111 | 468 | 114 | 41 | 14 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.3% | 8.7% | 15.5% | 2.9% | 4.18 | 4.13 | +1.7 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAD | 20 | 20 | 117 | 495 | 121 | 43 | 14 | 100% | 5.9 | 24.3% | 8.6% | 15.7% | 2.9% | 4.14 | 4.11 | +1.8 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | LAD | 19 | 19 | 114 | 482 | 117 | 42 | 14 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.3% | 8.7% | 15.6% | 3.0% | 4.15 | 4.16 | +1.7 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | LAD | 18 | 18 | 109 | 461 | 111 | 41 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.1% | 8.8% | 15.3% | 3.1% | 4.20 | 4.24 | +1.5 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | LAD | 17 | 17 | 102 | 430 | 103 | 39 | 14 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.9% | 9.1% | 14.8% | 3.2% | 4.30 | 4.37 | +1.2 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | LAD | 15 | 15 | 92 | 390 | 92 | 37 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 23.6% | 9.4% | 14.2% | 3.4% | 4.45 | 4.55 | +0.9 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB MLE | LAD | 14 | 14 | 82 | 348 | 81 | 34 | 13 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.2% | 9.7% | 13.4% | 3.6% | 4.63 | 4.75 | +0.6 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB MLE | LAD | 12 | 12 | 72 | 306 | 70 | 31 | 12 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.7% | 10.1% | 12.6% | 3.9% | 4.84 | 4.98 | +0.3 |
| 2037 | 33 | MLB MLE | LAD | 11 | 11 | 63 | 266 | 59 | 28 | 11 | 100% | 5.7 | 22.2% | 10.6% | 11.6% | 4.2% | 5.07 | 5.23 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | LAD | 8 | 8 | 47 | 198 | 48 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 5.9 | 24.0% | 9.0% | 15.0% | 3.0% | 4.31 | 4.26 | +0.7 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | LAD | 13 | 13 | 75 | 317 | 77 | 28 | 10 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.3% | 8.7% | 15.5% | 3.0% | 4.25 | 4.20 | +1.1 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAD | 16 | 16 | 94 | 397 | 97 | 34 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 24.3% | 8.6% | 15.7% | 3.0% | 4.21 | 4.18 | +1.4 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | LAD | 16 | 16 | 98 | 414 | 100 | 36 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.3% | 8.7% | 15.6% | 3.1% | 4.22 | 4.23 | +1.4 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | LAD | 16 | 16 | 97 | 410 | 99 | 36 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.1% | 8.8% | 15.3% | 3.2% | 4.27 | 4.31 | +1.3 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | LAD | 16 | 16 | 93 | 393 | 94 | 36 | 13 | 100% | 5.8 | 23.9% | 9.1% | 14.8% | 3.3% | 4.37 | 4.44 | +1.1 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | LAD | 14 | 14 | 85 | 359 | 85 | 34 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 23.6% | 9.4% | 14.2% | 3.6% | 4.53 | 4.63 | +0.8 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB CTX | LAD | 13 | 13 | 77 | 325 | 75 | 32 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.2% | 9.7% | 13.4% | 3.8% | 4.71 | 4.83 | +0.6 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB CTX | LAD | 11 | 11 | 68 | 287 | 65 | 29 | 12 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.7% | 10.1% | 12.6% | 4.1% | 4.93 | 5.07 | +0.3 |
| 2037 | 33 | MLB CTX | LAD | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 56 | 27 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.2% | 10.6% | 11.6% | 4.3% | 5.17 | 5.33 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 133 | 133 | 794 | 3353 | 796 | 309 | 114 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.7% | 9.2% | 14.5% | 3.4% | 4.46 | 4.13 | +11.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 200 | 78 | 29 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.7% | 9.2% | 14.5% | 3.4% | 4.46 | 4.13 | +3.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 19 | 19 | 76 | 321 | 80 | 41 | 6 | 100% | 4.0 | 25.0% | 12.8% | 12.2% | 1.9% | 3.54 | 3.64 | +11.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 50 | 50 | 200 | 841 | 210 | 108 | 16 | 100% | 4.0 | 25.0% | 12.8% | 12.2% | 1.9% | 3.54 | 3.64 | +2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Great Lakes Loons · 60 IPFIP 2.11 → 3.01 (+0.90)K% 32.0% → 24.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.98% | — | ×0.770 | 24.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.74% | — | ×1.150 | 13.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.40% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 0.51% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.11 → 3.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AATulsa Drillers · 16 IPFIP 4.53 → 5.76 (+1.23)K% 32.4% → 26.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.43% | — | ×0.810 | 26.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.46% | — | ×1.100 | 10.41% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.41% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 6.49% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.53 → 5.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 5.3 | 97 | 23.8% | 9.2% | 1.24 | 4.36 |
| Rich Hill ('25) | 7.1 | 101 | 23.9% | 9.2% | 1.12 | 4.02 |
| Bud Norris ('18) | 6.1 | 122 | 21.7% | 9.1% | 1.15 | 4.45 |
| Skip Lockwood ('69-'80, 11 WAR*) | 6.2 | 103 | 22.5%* | 9.1%* | 1.06* | 4.28* |
| Bobby Bolin ('61-'73, 12 WAR*) | 7.9 | 121 | 22.7%* | 9.6%* | 1.33* | 4.11* |
| Joe Hesketh ('84-'94, 10 WAR*) | 4.8 | 87 | 23.2%* | 8.8%* | 1.07* | 3.95* |
| Frankie Montas ('25) | 3.9 | 98 | 23.6% | 8.2% | 1.20 | 4.20 |