Khal Stephen
P Akron RubberDucks| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | MIX3 levels | 22 | 21 | 103 | 2.53 | 2.18 | 27.1% | 4.9% | — | K 20.6% · BB 5.7% · FIP 2.96 |
| 2026 | 23 | AACLE | 12 | 12 | 55 | 3.44 | 3.99 | 20.9% | 9.8% | — | K 16.9% · BB 10.8% · FIP 4.72 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBCLE | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.46 | 4.46 | 18.8% | 7.8% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ44% MLB | 25 | MLBCLE | 7 | 7 | 41 | 4.38 | 4.33 | 20.1% | 7.6% | 0.5 | |
| 2029PROJ67% MLB | 26 | MLBCLE | 11 | 11 | 64 | 4.32 | 4.28 | 20.8% | 7.6% | 0.8 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 22 | 21 | 103 | 406 | 110 | 20 | 5 | 95% | 4.7 | 20.6% | 5.7% | 15.0% | 1.6% | 2.53 | 2.96 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 22 | 21 | 103 | 406 | 110 | 20 | 5 | 95% | 4.7 | 20.6% | 5.7% | 15.0% | 1.6% | 2.53 | 2.96 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 22 | 21 | 103 | 406 | 110 | 20 | 5 | 95% | 4.7 | 27.1% | 4.9% | 22.2% | 1.2% | 2.53 | 2.18 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | 12 | 12 | 55 | 235 | 49 | 23 | 6 | 100% | 4.6 | 16.9% | 10.8% | 6.1% | 3.1% | 3.44 | 4.72 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA MLE | Akron RubberDucks | 12 | 12 | 55 | 235 | 49 | 23 | 6 | 100% | 4.6 | 16.9% | 10.8% | 6.1% | 3.1% | 3.44 | 4.72 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | AA RAW | Akron RubberDucks | 12 | 12 | 55 | 235 | 49 | 23 | 6 | 100% | 4.6 | 20.9% | 9.8% | 11.1% | 2.6% | 3.44 | 3.99 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | CLE | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 2.0 | 18.8% | 7.8% | 11.1% | 2.9% | 4.46 | 4.46 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | CLE | 16 | 16 | 93 | 392 | 79 | 30 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.1% | 7.6% | 12.5% | 2.9% | 4.38 | 4.33 | +1.2 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | CLE | 16 | 16 | 96 | 405 | 84 | 31 | 12 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.8% | 7.6% | 13.2% | 2.9% | 4.32 | 4.28 | +1.3 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | CLE | 15 | 15 | 92 | 388 | 81 | 30 | 11 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.8% | 7.7% | 13.2% | 2.9% | 4.31 | 4.31 | +1.2 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | CLE | 15 | 15 | 87 | 368 | 76 | 29 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.7% | 7.8% | 12.9% | 3.1% | 4.36 | 4.39 | +1.0 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | CLE | 13 | 13 | 81 | 341 | 70 | 27 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.5% | 8.0% | 12.4% | 3.2% | 4.46 | 4.53 | +0.8 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | CLE | 12 | 12 | 73 | 309 | 62 | 26 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.1% | 8.3% | 11.8% | 3.4% | 4.61 | 4.70 | +0.6 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB MLE | CLE | 11 | 11 | 65 | 275 | 54 | 24 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.7% | 8.7% | 11.0% | 3.6% | 4.79 | 4.91 | +0.4 |
| 2035 | 32 | MLB MLE | CLE | 10 | 10 | 57 | 241 | 46 | 22 | 9 | 100% | 5.7 | 19.3% | 9.1% | 10.2% | 3.9% | 4.99 | 5.13 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | CLE | 7 | 7 | 41 | 173 | 35 | 13 | 5 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.1% | 7.6% | 12.5% | 2.9% | 4.38 | 4.33 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | CLE | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.8% | 7.6% | 13.2% | 2.9% | 4.32 | 4.28 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | CLE | 12 | 12 | 71 | 300 | 62 | 23 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.8% | 7.7% | 13.2% | 2.9% | 4.31 | 4.31 | +0.9 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | CLE | 12 | 12 | 73 | 308 | 64 | 24 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.7% | 7.8% | 12.9% | 3.0% | 4.36 | 4.39 | +0.9 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | CLE | 12 | 12 | 71 | 300 | 61 | 24 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.5% | 8.0% | 12.4% | 3.2% | 4.46 | 4.53 | +0.7 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | CLE | 11 | 11 | 66 | 279 | 56 | 23 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.1% | 8.3% | 11.8% | 3.4% | 4.61 | 4.70 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB CTX | CLE | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 50 | 22 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.7% | 8.7% | 11.0% | 3.6% | 4.79 | 4.91 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 32 | MLB CTX | CLE | 9 | 9 | 53 | 224 | 43 | 20 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.3% | 9.1% | 10.2% | 3.9% | 4.98 | 5.12 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 83 | 83 | 499 | 2105 | 427 | 170 | 68 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.3% | 8.1% | 12.2% | 3.2% | 4.51 | 4.18 | +7.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 171 | 68 | 27 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.3% | 8.1% | 12.2% | 3.2% | 4.51 | 4.18 | +2.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 34 | 33 | 158 | 641 | 123 | 48 | 14 | 97% | 4.6 | 19.3% | 7.5% | 11.7% | 2.1% | 2.85 | 3.60 | +6.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 43 | 42 | 200 | 811 | 156 | 61 | 17 | 97% | 4.6 | 19.3% | 7.5% | 11.7% | 2.1% | 2.85 | 3.60 | +2.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAkron RubberDucks · 55 IPFIP 3.98 → 4.72 (+0.74)K% 20.9% → 16.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.85% | — | ×0.810 | 16.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.79% | — | ×1.100 | 10.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.55% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 3.06% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.98 → 4.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Vancouver Canadians · 48 IPFIP 2.14 → 3.03 (+0.90)K% 26.6% → 20.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.63% | — | ×0.770 | 20.51% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.43% | — | ×1.150 | 6.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.09% | ÷0.855 | ×1.250 | 1.59% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 71).
Result: FIP 2.14 → 3.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ADunedin Blue Jays · 39 IPFIP 1.39 → 2.19 (+0.80)K% 31.4% → 23.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.37% | — | ×0.740 | 23.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.58% | — | ×1.180 | 5.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.65% | ÷1.284 | ×1.300 | 0.66% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 157).
Result: FIP 1.39 → 2.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAkron RubberDucks · 15 IPFIP 3.65 → 4.48 (+0.83)K% 18.8% → 15.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.84% | — | ×0.810 | 15.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.35% | — | ×1.100 | 4.78% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.90% | ÷0.926 | ×1.200 | 3.76% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 3.65 → 4.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.7 | 82 | 20.1% | 8.0% | 1.22 | 4.49 |
| Odell Jones ('75-'88, 2 WAR*) | 2.7 | 78 | 20.8%* | 8.8%* | 1.18* | 4.62* |
| Rich Bordi ('80-'88, 1 WAR*) | 1.9 | 74 | 20.8%* | 7.3%* | 1.22* | 4.55* |
| Randy O'Neal ('84-'90, 1 WAR*) | 2.2 | 73 | 17.4%* | 7.8%* | 1.21* | 4.65* |
| Zach McAllister ('23) | 3.0 | 85 | 21.1% | 7.8% | 1.07 | 4.15 |
| Juan Nicasio ('20) | 3.6 | 80 | 21.3% | 8.3% | 1.04 | 4.71 |
| Scott Sanders ('99) | 3.4 | 97 | 21.2% | 9.3% | 1.23 | 4.86 |