Mason Erla
P Salt Lake Bees| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 27 | AAALAA | 10 | 1 | 22 | 7.48 | 6.42 | 15.0% | 12.1% | — | K 12.9% · BB 10.9% · FIP 6.25 |
| 2026 | 28 | AAALAA | 6 | 0 | 9 | 1.93 | 3.31 | 5.1% | 5.1% | — | K 5.1% · BB 5.1% · FIP 3.32 |
| 2027PROJ | 29 | MLBLAA | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4.92 | 4.92 | 17.1% | 9.2% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 30 | MLBLAA | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.96 | 5.03 | 17.3% | 9.5% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 3 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 67% | 2.4 | 42.3% | 0.0% | 42.3% | 0.0% | 1.23 | -0.47 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 3 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 67% | 2.4 | 42.3% | 0.0% | 42.3% | 0.0% | 1.23 | 0.10 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA MLE | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 16 | 16 | 82 | 348 | 64 | 19 | 9 | 100% | 5.1 | 14.9% | 6.0% | 8.9% | 2.7% | 4.28 | 4.11 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | AA RAW | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 16 | 16 | 82 | 348 | 64 | 19 | 9 | 100% | 5.1 | 18.4% | 5.5% | 12.9% | 2.6% | 4.28 | 3.66 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 13 | 11 | 49 | 242 | 39 | 30 | 10 | 85% | 3.8 | 13.3% | 12.5% | 0.8% | 4.8% | 8.94 | 6.20 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 13 | 11 | 49 | 242 | 39 | 30 | 10 | 85% | 3.8 | 16.1% | 12.4% | 3.7% | 4.1% | 8.94 | 5.98 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AA MLE | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 34 | 4 | 53 | 219 | 46 | 13 | 2 | 12% | 1.6 | 17.0% | 6.5% | 10.5% | 1.1% | 2.21 | 3.11 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AA MLE | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 34 | 4 | 53 | 219 | 46 | 13 | 2 | 12% | 1.6 | 17.0% | 6.5% | 10.5% | 1.1% | 2.21 | 3.11 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AA RAW | Rocket City Trash Pandas | 34 | 4 | 53 | 219 | 46 | 13 | 2 | 12% | 1.6 | 21.0% | 5.9% | 15.1% | 0.9% | 2.21 | 2.59 | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA MLE | Salt Lake Bees | 10 | 1 | 22 | 107 | 16 | 13 | 5 | 10% | 2.2 | 12.9% | 10.9% | 1.9% | 5.2% | 7.48 | 6.25 | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA MLE | Salt Lake Bees | 10 | 1 | 22 | 107 | 16 | 13 | 5 | 10% | 2.2 | 12.9% | 10.9% | 1.9% | 5.2% | 7.48 | 6.25 | — |
| 2025 | 27 | AAA RAW | Salt Lake Bees | 10 | 1 | 22 | 107 | 16 | 13 | 5 | 10% | 2.2 | 15.0% | 12.1% | 2.8% | 4.7% | 7.48 | 6.42 | — |
| 2026 | 28 | AAA MLE | Salt Lake Bees | 6 | 0 | 9 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.6 | 5.1% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.93 | 3.32 | — |
| 2026 | 28 | AAA MLE | Salt Lake Bees | 6 | 0 | 9 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.6 | 5.1% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.93 | 3.32 | — |
| 2026 | 28 | AAA RAW | Salt Lake Bees | 6 | 0 | 9 | 39 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.6 | 5.1% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.93 | 3.31 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB | LAA | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.1% | 9.2% | 7.9% | 3.1% | 4.92 | 4.92 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | LAA | 16 | 0 | 16 | 69 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.3% | 9.5% | 7.9% | 3.3% | 4.96 | 5.03 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | LAA | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.3% | 9.5% | 7.9% | 3.3% | 4.96 | 5.03 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 17.4% | 9.5% | 7.9% | 3.3% | 4.96 | 4.65 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 133 | 67 | 33 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.4% | 9.5% | 7.9% | 3.3% | 4.96 | 4.65 | -0.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 82 | 34 | 223 | 981 | 148 | 79 | 29 | 41% | 2.7 | 15.1% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 3.0% | 4.93 | 4.48 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 74 | 31 | 200 | 881 | 133 | 71 | 26 | 41% | 2.7 | 15.1% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 3.0% | 4.93 | 4.48 | -1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAASalt Lake Bees · 9 IPFIP 3.32 → 3.31 (−0.00)K% 5.1% → 4.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 5.13% | — | ×0.860 | 4.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.13% | — | ×0.900 | 4.62% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.32 → 3.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAASalt Lake Bees · 22 IPFIP 5.94 → 6.25 (+0.31)K% 15.0% → 12.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.95% | — | ×0.860 | 12.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.15% | — | ×0.900 | 10.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.67% | ÷0.989 | ×1.100 | 5.20% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 5.94 → 6.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 53 IPFIP 2.58 → 3.11 (+0.53)K% 21.0% → 17.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.00% | — | ×0.810 | 17.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.94% | — | ×1.100 | 6.53% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.91% | ÷0.976 | ×1.200 | 1.12% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 2.58 → 3.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 29 IPFIP 5.04 → 5.99 (+0.95)K% 19.5% → 15.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.55% | — | ×0.810 | 15.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.03% | — | ×1.100 | 13.23% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.76% | ÷0.970 | ×1.200 | 4.65% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 5.04 → 5.99, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAASalt Lake Bees · 21 IPFIP 6.24 → 6.46 (+0.22)K% 11.9% → 10.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 11.93% | — | ×0.860 | 10.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.84% | — | ×0.900 | 11.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.59% | ÷1.003 | ×1.100 | 5.03% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 6.24 → 6.46, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 82 IPFIP 3.66 → 4.11 (+0.45)K% 18.4% → 14.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.39% | — | ×0.810 | 14.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.46% | — | ×1.100 | 6.01% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.59% | ÷1.131 | ×1.200 | 2.74% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).
Result: FIP 3.66 → 4.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).