Emerson Hancock
P Seattle Mariners| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 29 | 29 | 155 | 3.95 | 4.65 | 15.9% | 8.3% | 1.3 | K 14.5% · BB 7.8% · FIP 4.68 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 33 | 25 | 135 | 5.01 | 4.27 | 20.4% | 7.8% | 1.8 | K 19.1% · BB 7.6% · FIP 4.31 |
| 2026 | 27 | MLBSEA | 25 | 25 | 139 | 3.57 | 3.83 | 22.3% | 5.5% | 2.6 | |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBSEA | 16 | 16 | 96 | 4.50 | 4.53 | 20.4% | 6.7% | 1.0 | |
| 2028PROJ95% MLB | 29 | MLBSEA | 13 | 13 | 77 | 4.56 | 4.64 | 19.8% | 7.0% | 0.6 | |
| 2029PROJ95% MLB | 30 | MLBSEA | 10 | 10 | 63 | 4.73 | 4.84 | 19.1% | 7.3% | 0.4 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 45 | 179 | 43 | 17 | 1 | 100% | 3.7 | 18.8% | 10.8% | 8.0% | 0.6% | 2.62 | 3.24 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 12 | 45 | 179 | 43 | 17 | 1 | 100% | 3.7 | 24.0% | 9.5% | 14.5% | 0.6% | 2.62 | 2.61 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA MLE | Arkansas Travelers | 21 | 21 | 98 | 413 | 92 | 38 | 16 | 100% | 4.7 | 18.0% | 10.1% | 7.9% | 5.1% | 3.75 | 5.67 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | AA RAW | Arkansas Travelers | 21 | 21 | 98 | 413 | 92 | 38 | 16 | 100% | 4.7 | 22.3% | 9.2% | 13.1% | 3.9% | 3.75 | 4.50 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 110 | 460 | 113 | 41 | 10 | 100% | 4.8 | 21.1% | 10.2% | 10.9% | 3.1% | 4.34 | 4.30 | +1.4 |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 110 | 460 | 113 | 41 | 10 | 100% | 4.8 | 24.6% | 8.9% | 15.7% | 2.2% | 4.34 | 3.35 | +2.8 |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 29 | 155 | 661 | 105 | 55 | 22 | 100% | 5.3 | 14.5% | 7.8% | 6.7% | 3.3% | 3.95 | 4.68 | +1.3 |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 29 | 155 | 661 | 105 | 55 | 22 | 100% | 5.3 | 14.5% | 7.8% | 6.7% | 3.3% | 3.95 | 4.68 | +1.3 |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 29 | 155 | 661 | 105 | 55 | 22 | 100% | 5.3 | 15.9% | 8.3% | 7.6% | 3.3% | 3.95 | 4.65 | +1.3 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 25 | 135 | 587 | 120 | 46 | 20 | 76% | 4.1 | 19.1% | 7.6% | 11.5% | 3.4% | 5.01 | 4.31 | +1.7 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 25 | 135 | 587 | 120 | 46 | 20 | 76% | 4.1 | 19.1% | 7.6% | 11.5% | 3.4% | 5.01 | 4.31 | +1.7 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 33 | 25 | 135 | 587 | 120 | 46 | 20 | 76% | 4.1 | 20.4% | 7.8% | 12.6% | 3.4% | 5.01 | 4.27 | +1.8 |
| 2026 | 27 | MLB MLE | Seattle Mariners | 25 | 25 | 139 | 566 | 126 | 31 | 20 | 100% | 5.5 | 22.3% | 5.5% | 16.8% | 3.6% | 3.57 | 3.90 | +2.5 |
| 2026 | 27 | MLB MLE | Seattle Mariners | 25 | 25 | 139 | 566 | 126 | 31 | 20 | 100% | 5.5 | 22.3% | 5.5% | 16.8% | 3.6% | 3.57 | 3.90 | +2.5 |
| 2026 | 27 | MLB RAW | Seattle Mariners | 25 | 25 | 139 | 566 | 126 | 31 | 20 | 100% | 5.5 | 22.3% | 5.5% | 16.8% | 3.5% | 3.57 | 3.83 | +2.6 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 62 | 56 | 301 | 1266 | 235 | 84 | 48 | 90% | 4.9 | 18.6% | 6.6% | 11.9% | 3.8% | 4.24 | 4.45 | +3.4 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | SEA | 16 | 16 | 96 | 405 | 83 | 27 | 14 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.4% | 6.7% | 13.6% | 3.5% | 4.50 | 4.53 | +1.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | SEA | 13 | 13 | 81 | 342 | 68 | 24 | 12 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.8% | 7.0% | 12.8% | 3.6% | 4.61 | 4.69 | +0.7 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB MLE | SEA | 11 | 11 | 66 | 279 | 53 | 20 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.1% | 7.3% | 11.8% | 3.8% | 4.78 | 4.89 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 31 | MLB MLE | SEA | 9 | 9 | 53 | 222 | 41 | 17 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 18.3% | 7.6% | 10.7% | 4.1% | 4.99 | 5.12 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | SEA | 13 | 13 | 77 | 325 | 64 | 23 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.8% | 7.0% | 12.8% | 3.5% | 4.56 | 4.64 | +0.6 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB CTX | SEA | 10 | 10 | 63 | 266 | 51 | 19 | 10 | 100% | 6.3 | 19.1% | 7.3% | 11.8% | 3.7% | 4.73 | 4.84 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 31 | MLB CTX | SEA | 8 | 8 | 50 | 211 | 39 | 16 | 8 | 100% | 6.2 | 18.3% | 7.6% | 10.7% | 4.0% | 4.93 | 5.06 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 94 | 88 | 491 | 2067 | 388 | 142 | 78 | 94% | 5.2 | 18.8% | 6.9% | 11.9% | 3.8% | 4.42 | 4.45 | +5.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 38 | 36 | 200 | 842 | 158 | 58 | 32 | 94% | 5.2 | 18.8% | 6.9% | 11.9% | 3.8% | 4.42 | 4.45 | +2.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 143 | 135 | 681 | 2866 | 539 | 235 | 99 | 94% | 4.8 | 18.8% | 8.2% | 10.6% | 3.4% | 4.03 | 4.44 | +4.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 42 | 40 | 200 | 841 | 158 | 69 | 29 | 94% | 4.8 | 18.8% | 8.2% | 10.6% | 3.4% | 4.03 | 4.44 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAATacoma Rainiers · 45 IPFIP 3.06 → 3.17 (+0.12)K% 27.7% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.72% | — | ×0.860 | 23.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.43% | — | ×0.900 | 6.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.48% | ÷1.204 | ×1.100 | 2.26% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 141).
Result: FIP 3.06 → 3.17, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAATacoma Rainiers · 94 IPFIP 4.23 → 4.26 (+0.03)K% 16.7% → 14.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.71% | — | ×0.860 | 14.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.11% | — | ×0.900 | 8.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.53% | ÷1.142 | ×1.100 | 2.44% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 128).
Result: FIP 4.23 → 4.26, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAArkansas Travelers · 98 IPFIP 3.27 → 4.30 (+1.02)K% 26.0% → 21.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.03% | — | ×0.810 | 21.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.25% | — | ×1.100 | 10.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.19% | ÷0.853 | ×1.200 | 3.08% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 71).
Result: FIP 3.27 → 4.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAArkansas Travelers · 98 IPFIP 4.51 → 5.67 (+1.16)K% 22.3% → 18.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.28% | — | ×0.810 | 18.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.20% | — | ×1.100 | 10.12% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.87% | ÷0.909 | ×1.200 | 5.12% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 4.51 → 5.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Everett AquaSox · 31 IPFIP 2.83 → 3.57 (+0.74)K% 24.2% → 18.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.19% | — | ×0.770 | 18.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.48% | — | ×1.150 | 12.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.81% | ÷1.078 | ×1.250 | 0.94% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 2.83 → 3.57, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAArkansas Travelers · 14 IPFIP 2.03 → 2.50 (+0.47)K% 23.6% → 19.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.64% | — | ×0.810 | 19.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.27% | — | ×1.100 | 8.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.892 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 2.03 → 2.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.0 | 85 | 19.1% | 6.9% | 1.45 | 4.46 |
| Vidal Nuño ('18) | 1.9 | 75 | 19.6% | 6.6% | 1.55 | 4.06 |
| Matt Andriese ('24) | 2.6 | 74 | 21.8% | 6.7% | 1.36 | 4.65 |
| Jaime Barria ('23) | 2.3 | 77 | 17.9% | 7.7% | 1.61 | 4.38 |
| Jim Willoughby ('71-'78, 4 WAR*) | 2.8 | 79 | 16.0%* | 6.2%* | 1.42* | 4.13* |
| Jerry Garvin ('77-'82, 4 WAR*) | 3.0 | 101 | 19.3%* | 8.4%* | 1.44* | 4.52* |
| Pat Underwood ('79-'83, 1 WAR*) | 1.7 | 115 | 20.9%* | 6.3%* | 1.57* | 4.52* |