Zack Godley
P Las Vegas Aviators| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 31 | MIX2 levels | 23 | 19 | 102 | 4.78 | 4.93 | 20.0% | 12.7% | 0.5 | K 17.4% · BB 12.7% · FIP 5.00 | |
| 2022 | 32 | AAACIN | 14 | 2 | 22 | 8.06 | 5.97 | 24.6% | 16.1% | — | K 21.6% · BB 16.9% · FIP 5.41 | |
| 2023 | 33 | AAAOAK | 12 | 10 | 57 | 5.21 | 4.78 | 22.0% | 12.0% | — | K 18.9% · BB 10.8% · FIP 4.97 | |
| 2024 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 30 | 23 | 136 | 556 | 124 | 45 | 9 | 77% | 4.5 | 18.7% | 8.8% | 9.9% | 1.8% | 2.84 | 3.62 | +2.9 |
| 2015 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 30 | 23 | 136 | 556 | 124 | 45 | 9 | 77% | 4.5 | 22.3% | 8.1% | 14.2% | 1.6% | 2.84 | 3.13 | +3.8 |
| 2016 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 42 | 23 | 157 | 682 | 129 | 46 | 20 | 55% | 3.7 | 17.4% | 7.0% | 10.4% | 2.9% | 4.94 | 4.13 | +2.3 |
| 2016 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 42 | 23 | 157 | 682 | 129 | 46 | 20 | 55% | 3.7 | 18.9% | 6.7% | 12.2% | 2.9% | 4.94 | 3.99 | +2.6 |
| 2017 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 28 | 183 | 737 | 194 | 68 | 15 | 90% | 5.9 | 25.9% | 9.3% | 16.5% | 2.0% | 3.25 | 3.21 | +5.0 |
| 2017 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 31 | 28 | 183 | 737 | 194 | 68 | 15 | 90% | 5.9 | 26.3% | 9.2% | 17.1% | 2.0% | 3.25 | 3.16 | +5.1 |
| 2018 | 28 | MLB MLE | Arizona Diamondbacks | 33 | 32 | 178 | 791 | 185 | 79 | 16 | 97% | 5.4 | 23.4% | 10.0% | 13.4% | 2.1% | 4.74 | 3.56 | +4.0 |
| 2018 | 28 | MLB RAW | Arizona Diamondbacks | 33 | 32 | 178 | 791 | 185 | 79 | 16 | 97% | 5.4 | 23.4% | 10.0% | 13.4% | 2.0% | 4.74 | 3.52 | +4.1 |
| 2019 | 29 | MLB MLE | Toronto Blue Jays | 33 | 9 | 92 | 407 | 70 | 40 | 14 | 27% | 2.8 | 17.2% | 9.8% | 7.4% | 3.4% | 5.97 | 4.78 | -0.2 |
| 2019 | 29 | MLB RAW | Toronto Blue Jays | 33 | 9 | 92 | 407 | 70 | 40 | 14 | 27% | 2.8 | 17.2% | 9.8% | 7.4% | 3.4% | 5.97 | 4.86 | -0.3 |
| 2020 | 30 | MLB MLE | Boston Red Sox | 8 | 7 | 29 | 143 | 28 | 14 | 9 | 88% | 3.6 | 19.6% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 6.5% | 8.16 | 6.23 | -0.3 |
| 2020 | 30 | MLB RAW | Boston Red Sox | 8 | 7 | 29 | 143 | 28 | 14 | 9 | 88% | 3.6 | 19.6% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 6.3% | 8.16 | 6.69 | -0.4 |
| 2021 | 31 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 19 | 102 | 450 | 90 | 57 | 15 | 83% | 4.4 | 17.4% | 12.7% | 4.7% | 3.2% | 4.78 | 5.00 | +0.5 |
| 2021 | 31 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 19 | 102 | 450 | 90 | 57 | 15 | 83% | 4.4 | 20.0% | 12.7% | 7.3% | 3.3% | 4.78 | 4.93 | +0.5 |
| 2022 | 32 | AAA MLE | Louisville Bats | 14 | 2 | 22 | 118 | 29 | 19 | 5 | 14% | 1.6 | 21.6% | 16.9% | 4.7% | 3.6% | 8.06 | 5.41 | — |
| 2022 | 32 | AAA RAW | Louisville Bats | 14 | 2 | 22 | 118 | 29 | 19 | 5 | 14% | 1.6 | 24.6% | 16.1% | 8.5% | 4.2% | 8.06 | 5.97 | — |
| 2023 | 33 | AAA MLE | Las Vegas Aviators | 12 | 10 | 57 | 259 | 57 | 31 | 9 | 83% | 4.8 | 18.9% | 10.8% | 8.2% | 3.8% | 5.21 | 4.97 | — |
| 2023 | 33 | AAA RAW | Las Vegas Aviators | 12 | 10 | 57 | 259 | 57 | 31 | 9 | 83% | 4.8 | 22.0% | 12.0% | 10.0% | 3.5% | 5.21 | 4.78 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 138 | 89 | 569 | 2474 | 547 | 226 | 73 | 64% | 4.1 | 22.1% | 9.1% | 13.0% | 3.0% | 4.92 | 4.04 | +9.2 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 138 | 89 | 569 | 2474 | 547 | 226 | 73 | 64% | 4.1 | 22.1% | 9.1% | 13.0% | 3.0% | 4.92 | 4.01 | +9.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 49 | 31 | 200 | 870 | 192 | 79 | 26 | 64% | 4.1 | 22.1% | 9.1% | 13.0% | 3.0% | 4.92 | 4.01 | +3.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 226 | 153 | 956 | 4143 | 849 | 404 | 114 | 68% | 4.2 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 10.7% | 2.7% | 4.55 | 4.11 | +9.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 47 | 32 | 200 | 867 | 178 | 84 | 24 | 68% | 4.2 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 10.7% | 2.7% | 4.55 | 4.11 | +3.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 57 IPFIP 4.66 → 4.97 (+0.31)K% 22.0% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.01% | — | ×0.860 | 18.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.97% | — | ×0.900 | 10.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.47% | ÷0.996 | ×1.100 | 3.84% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 4.66 → 4.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAALouisville Bats · 22 IPFIP 5.39 → 5.41 (+0.02)K% 24.6% → 21.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.58% | — | ×0.880 | 21.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.10% | — | ×1.050 | 16.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.24% | ÷1.282 | ×1.100 | 3.64% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 156).
Result: FIP 5.39 → 5.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAASyracuse Mets · 98 IPFIP 4.63 → 5.00 (+0.37)K% 19.8% → 17.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.81% | — | ×0.880 | 17.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.12% | — | ×1.050 | 12.73% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷1.039 | ×1.100 | 3.21% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 108).
Result: FIP 4.63 → 5.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAAReno Aces · 28 IPFIP 2.83 → 3.20 (+0.37)K% 26.4% → 23.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.36% | — | ×0.880 | 23.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.45% | — | ×1.050 | 16.23% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.044 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 2.83 → 3.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAMobile BayBears · 49 IPFIP 3.58 → 3.94 (+0.35)K% 15.4% → 12.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.42% | — | ×0.810 | 12.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.47% | — | ×1.100 | 6.02% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.99% | ÷1.160 | ×1.200 | 2.06% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 132).
Result: FIP 3.58 → 3.94, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAAReno Aces · 33 IPFIP 3.24 → 3.58 (+0.33)K% 26.0% → 22.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.03% | — | ×0.880 | 22.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.59% | — | ×1.050 | 10.07% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.05% | ÷1.092 | ×1.100 | 2.07% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 3.24 → 3.58, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 A+Visalia Rawhide · 75 IPFIP 2.27 → 3.04 (+0.77)K% 25.5% → 19.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.49% | — | ×0.770 | 19.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.21% | — | ×1.150 | 7.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.98% | ÷0.973 | ×1.250 | 1.26% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 2.27 → 3.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAMobile BayBears · 24 IPFIP 4.45 → 4.87 (+0.42)K% 12.0% → 9.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.00% | — | ×0.810 | 9.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.100 | 11.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.00% | ÷1.098 | ×1.200 | 2.19% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).
Result: FIP 4.45 → 4.87, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).