Jackson Jobe
P Detroit Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | MIX4 levels | 23 | 21 | 96 | 2.26 | 3.04 | 25.1% | 11.8% | 2.8 | K 21.9% · BB 14.0% · FIP 3.49 |
| 2025 | 23 | MLBDET | 10 | 10 | 49 | 4.22 | 5.02 | 17.9% | 12.4% | 0.2 | |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX5 levels | 14 | 14 | 61 | 3.38 | 3.34 | 26.4% | 7.8% | 1.5 | K 26.4% · BB 8.3% · FIP 4.00 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBDET | 8 | 8 | 47 | 4.09 | 4.23 | 26.6% | 9.2% | 0.6 | |
| 2028PROJ92% MLB | 26 | MLBDET | 12 | 12 | 71 | 4.03 | 4.04 | 27.5% | 9.0% | 1.1 | |
| 2029PROJ94% MLB | 27 | MLBDET | 12 | 12 | 74 | 4.07 | 4.09 | 27.1% | 9.0% | 1.1 |
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 77 | 333 | 81 | 30 | 14 | 100% | 3.7 | 18.1% | 10.6% | 7.5% | 4.5% | 3.84 | 5.41 | — |
| 2022 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 77 | 333 | 81 | 30 | 14 | 100% | 3.7 | 24.3% | 9.0% | 15.3% | 4.2% | 3.84 | 4.52 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 16 | 16 | 64 | 258 | 84 | 6 | 9 | 100% | 4.0 | 24.7% | 3.1% | 21.7% | 5.3% | 2.81 | 4.30 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 16 | 16 | 64 | 258 | 84 | 6 | 9 | 100% | 4.0 | 32.6% | 2.3% | 30.2% | 3.5% | 2.81 | 2.58 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 23 | 21 | 96 | 391 | 98 | 46 | 4 | 91% | 4.2 | 21.9% | 14.0% | 8.0% | 0.9% | 2.26 | 3.49 | +2.2 |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 23 | 21 | 96 | 391 | 98 | 46 | 4 | 91% | 4.2 | 21.9% | 14.0% | 8.0% | 0.9% | 2.26 | 3.49 | +2.2 |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 23 | 21 | 96 | 391 | 98 | 46 | 4 | 91% | 4.2 | 25.1% | 11.8% | 13.3% | 1.0% | 2.26 | 3.04 | +2.8 |
| 2025 | 23 | MLB MLE | Detroit Tigers | 10 | 10 | 49 | 218 | 39 | 27 | 7 | 100% | 4.9 | 17.9% | 12.4% | 5.5% | 3.4% | 4.22 | 5.00 | +0.2 |
| 2025 | 23 | MLB MLE | Detroit Tigers | 10 | 10 | 49 | 218 | 39 | 27 | 7 | 100% | 4.9 | 17.9% | 12.4% | 5.5% | 3.4% | 4.22 | 5.00 | +0.2 |
| 2025 | 23 | MLB RAW | Detroit Tigers | 10 | 10 | 49 | 218 | 39 | 27 | 7 | 100% | 4.9 | 17.9% | 12.4% | 5.5% | 3.2% | 4.22 | 5.02 | +0.2 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 5 levels | 14 | 14 | 61 | 258 | 68 | 20 | 7 | 100% | 4.4 | 26.4% | 8.3% | 18.1% | 3.8% | 3.38 | 4.00 | +1.0 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 5 levels | 14 | 14 | 61 | 258 | 68 | 20 | 7 | 100% | 4.4 | 26.4% | 8.3% | 18.1% | 3.8% | 3.38 | 4.00 | +1.0 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX RAW | 5 levels | 14 | 14 | 61 | 258 | 68 | 20 | 7 | 100% | 4.4 | 26.4% | 7.8% | 18.6% | 2.7% | 3.38 | 3.34 | +1.5 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 21 | 19 | 99 | 427 | 92 | 44 | 14 | 90% | 4.7 | 21.5% | 10.3% | 11.2% | 3.3% | 3.91 | 4.41 | +1.1 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | DET | 8 | 8 | 47 | 198 | 53 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 26.6% | 9.2% | 17.4% | 3.3% | 4.09 | 4.23 | +0.6 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 13 | 13 | 77 | 326 | 90 | 29 | 11 | 100% | 5.9 | 27.5% | 9.0% | 18.4% | 3.3% | 4.11 | 4.12 | +1.2 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 13 | 13 | 79 | 334 | 90 | 30 | 11 | 100% | 6.1 | 27.1% | 9.0% | 18.1% | 3.3% | 4.15 | 4.17 | +1.1 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 13 | 13 | 76 | 322 | 86 | 29 | 11 | 100% | 5.9 | 26.7% | 9.1% | 17.6% | 3.4% | 4.21 | 4.26 | +1.0 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 11 | 11 | 69 | 291 | 76 | 27 | 10 | 100% | 6.3 | 26.0% | 9.3% | 16.7% | 3.6% | 4.33 | 4.42 | +0.8 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | DET | 10 | 10 | 59 | 250 | 63 | 24 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 25.3% | 9.6% | 15.7% | 3.8% | 4.51 | 4.62 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB MLE | DET | 8 | 8 | 48 | 202 | 49 | 20 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.5% | 9.9% | 14.6% | 4.0% | 4.72 | 4.86 | +0.3 |
| 2034 | 32 | MLB MLE | DET | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 52 | 19 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 25.7% | 9.5% | 16.2% | 4.2% | 4.79 | 4.84 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 33 | MLB MLE | DET | 6 | 6 | 35 | 147 | 37 | 15 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.9% | 10.0% | 14.9% | 4.5% | 4.99 | 5.12 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 12 | 12 | 71 | 300 | 82 | 27 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 27.5% | 9.0% | 18.4% | 3.2% | 4.03 | 4.04 | +1.1 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 12 | 12 | 74 | 312 | 85 | 28 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 27.1% | 9.0% | 18.1% | 3.2% | 4.07 | 4.09 | +1.1 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 12 | 12 | 72 | 304 | 81 | 28 | 10 | 100% | 6.0 | 26.7% | 9.1% | 17.6% | 3.3% | 4.13 | 4.18 | +1.0 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 11 | 11 | 65 | 274 | 71 | 25 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 26.0% | 9.3% | 16.7% | 3.4% | 4.25 | 4.34 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | DET | 9 | 9 | 56 | 236 | 60 | 23 | 9 | 100% | 6.2 | 25.3% | 9.6% | 15.7% | 3.6% | 4.42 | 4.53 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB CTX | DET | 8 | 8 | 45 | 190 | 47 | 19 | 7 | 100% | 5.6 | 24.5% | 9.9% | 14.6% | 3.8% | 4.63 | 4.77 | +0.3 |
| 2034 | 32 | MLB CTX | DET | 8 | 8 | 46 | 194 | 50 | 19 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 25.7% | 9.5% | 16.2% | 4.1% | 4.69 | 4.74 | +0.3 |
| 2035 | 33 | MLB CTX | DET | 6 | 6 | 33 | 139 | 35 | 14 | 6 | 100% | 5.5 | 24.9% | 10.0% | 14.9% | 4.3% | 4.88 | 5.01 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 98 | 96 | 563 | 2384 | 604 | 227 | 83 | 98% | 5.7 | 25.3% | 9.5% | 15.8% | 3.5% | 4.24 | 4.07 | +8.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 35 | 34 | 200 | 848 | 215 | 81 | 30 | 98% | 5.7 | 25.3% | 9.5% | 15.8% | 3.5% | 4.24 | 4.07 | +3.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 84 | 82 | 347 | 1458 | 317 | 146 | 49 | 98% | 4.1 | 21.7% | 10.0% | 11.7% | 3.4% | 3.19 | 4.39 | +6.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 48 | 47 | 200 | 840 | 183 | 84 | 28 | 98% | 4.1 | 21.7% | 10.0% | 11.7% | 3.4% | 3.19 | 4.39 | +2.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAErie SeaWolves · 7 IPFIP 1.94 → 2.41 (+0.47)K% 24.1% → 19.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.14% | — | ×0.810 | 19.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.90% | — | ×1.100 | 7.59% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.94 → 2.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAErie SeaWolves · 74 IPFIP 2.79 → 3.49 (+0.70)K% 27.1% → 21.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.09% | — | ×0.810 | 21.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.71% | — | ×1.100 | 13.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.67% | ÷0.941 | ×1.200 | 0.85% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 2.79 → 3.49, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 9 IPFIP 5.75 → 6.79 (+1.04)K% 16.3% → 14.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.28% | — | ×0.860 | 14.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.63% | — | ×0.900 | 10.47% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.65% | ÷0.792 | ×1.100 | 6.46% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 58).
Result: FIP 5.75 → 6.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 9 IPFIP 1.82 → 2.41 (+0.59)K% 24.2% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.24% | — | ×0.770 | 18.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.06% | — | ×1.150 | 6.97% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.889 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 1.82 → 2.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 40 IPFIP 2.89 → 4.58 (+1.69)K% 33.8% → 26.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.75% | — | ×0.770 | 25.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 1.88% | — | ×1.150 | 2.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.38% | ÷0.882 | ×1.250 | 6.20% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 2.89 → 4.58, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 16 IPFIP 2.79 → 3.65 (+0.86)K% 29.4% → 21.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.41% | — | ×0.740 | 21.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.41% | — | ×1.180 | 5.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.94% | ÷1.216 | ×1.300 | 3.14% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 143).
Result: FIP 2.79 → 3.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAErie SeaWolves · 6 IPFIP 0.99 → 1.39 (+0.40)K% 25.0% → 20.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.810 | 20.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.055 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 0.99 → 1.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 62 IPFIP 4.49 → 5.32 (+0.83)K% 26.3% → 19.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.30% | — | ×0.740 | 19.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.26% | — | ×1.180 | 10.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.44% | ÷1.279 | ×1.300 | 4.52% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 156).
Result: FIP 4.49 → 5.32, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.2 | 59 | 25.5% | 9.5% | 1.38 | 4.30 |
| Will Smith ('24) | 3.3 | 59 | 27.4% | 8.7% | 1.16 | 3.85 |
| David Hernandez ('19) | 3.2 | 65 | 23.9% | 9.1% | 1.22 | 4.12 |
| Dominic Leone ('24) | 2.1 | 54 | 23.9% | 10.4% | 1.26 | 3.94 |
| Xavier Hernandez ('89-'98, 3 WAR*) | 3.4 | 67 | 23.9%* | 9.1%* | 1.12* | 4.20* |
| Cecilio Guante ('82-'90, 6 WAR*) | 3.0 | 66 | 26.6%* | 9.2%* | 1.30* | 3.85* |
| Jeff Brantley ('88-'01, 9 WAR*) | 4.3 | 72 | 24.3%* | 10.0%* | 1.43* | 3.73* |