Brendan Beck
P Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 10 | 10 | 34 | 1.59 | 2.13 | 31.0% | 5.4% | — | K 22.5% · BB 6.7% · FIP 3.19 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 26 | 24 | 131 | 3.36 | 3.44 | 23.6% | 6.9% | — | K 19.8% · BB 6.7% · FIP 3.82 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 29 | 27 | 148 | 3.53 | 3.26 | 27.4% | 8.0% | 3.9 | K 23.9% · BB 7.4% · FIP 3.54 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBNYY | 10 | 10 | 62 | 4.13 | 4.02 | 21.4% | 5.3% | 1.0 | |
| 2028PROJ77% MLB | 29 | MLBNYY | 11 | 11 | 64 | 4.30 | 4.32 | 20.8% | 5.8% | 0.9 | |
| 2029PROJ83% MLB | 30 | MLBNYY | 10 | 10 | 61 | 4.45 | 4.54 | 20.2% | 6.2% | 0.7 |
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 10 | 10 | 34 | 129 | 40 | 7 | 2 | 100% | 3.4 | 22.5% | 6.7% | 15.8% | 2.1% | 1.59 | 3.19 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 10 | 10 | 34 | 129 | 40 | 7 | 2 | 100% | 3.4 | 31.0% | 5.4% | 25.6% | 1.6% | 1.59 | 2.13 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 24 | 131 | 522 | 123 | 36 | 14 | 92% | 5.1 | 19.8% | 6.7% | 13.1% | 2.8% | 3.36 | 3.82 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 26 | 24 | 131 | 522 | 123 | 36 | 14 | 92% | 5.1 | 19.8% | 6.7% | 13.1% | 2.8% | 3.36 | 3.82 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 26 | 24 | 131 | 522 | 123 | 36 | 14 | 92% | 5.1 | 23.6% | 6.9% | 16.7% | 2.7% | 3.36 | 3.44 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 27 | 148 | 598 | 164 | 48 | 16 | 93% | 5.1 | 23.9% | 7.4% | 16.5% | 2.8% | 3.53 | 3.54 | +3.3 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 27 | 148 | 598 | 164 | 48 | 16 | 93% | 5.1 | 23.9% | 7.4% | 16.5% | 2.8% | 3.53 | 3.54 | +3.3 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 27 | 148 | 598 | 164 | 48 | 16 | 93% | 5.1 | 27.4% | 8.0% | 19.4% | 2.7% | 3.53 | 3.26 | +3.9 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 4 | 2 | 13 | 58 | 13 | 8 | 6 | 50% | 3.2 | 22.4% | 13.8% | 8.6% | 10.3% | 9.95 | 9.10 | -0.5 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | NYY | 10 | 10 | 62 | 262 | 56 | 14 | 8 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.4% | 5.3% | 16.1% | 3.0% | 4.13 | 4.02 | +1.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | NYY | 14 | 14 | 82 | 348 | 73 | 20 | 11 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.8% | 5.8% | 15.1% | 3.2% | 4.18 | 4.20 | +1.2 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB MLE | NYY | 12 | 12 | 74 | 312 | 63 | 19 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.2% | 6.2% | 14.0% | 3.4% | 4.32 | 4.41 | +0.9 |
| 2030 | 31 | MLB MLE | NYY | 12 | 12 | 72 | 302 | 65 | 18 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.6% | 5.8% | 15.8% | 3.6% | 4.34 | 4.36 | +0.9 |
| 2031 | 32 | MLB MLE | NYY | 10 | 10 | 62 | 264 | 55 | 17 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.8% | 6.3% | 14.5% | 3.8% | 4.51 | 4.62 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 33 | MLB MLE | NYY | 9 | 9 | 53 | 223 | 45 | 15 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.0% | 6.8% | 13.2% | 4.1% | 4.74 | 4.89 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | NYY | 11 | 11 | 64 | 270 | 56 | 16 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.8% | 5.8% | 15.1% | 3.4% | 4.30 | 4.32 | +0.9 |
| 2029 | 30 | MLB CTX | NYY | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 52 | 16 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.2% | 6.2% | 14.0% | 3.6% | 4.45 | 4.54 | +0.7 |
| 2030 | 31 | MLB CTX | NYY | 10 | 10 | 62 | 262 | 56 | 15 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.6% | 5.8% | 15.8% | 3.8% | 4.47 | 4.49 | +0.8 |
| 2031 | 32 | MLB CTX | NYY | 9 | 9 | 56 | 236 | 49 | 15 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.8% | 6.3% | 14.5% | 4.1% | 4.65 | 4.76 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 33 | MLB CTX | NYY | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 40 | 14 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.0% | 6.8% | 13.2% | 4.4% | 4.89 | 5.04 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 52 | 50 | 303 | 1285 | 267 | 83 | 53 | 96% | 5.8 | 20.8% | 6.5% | 14.3% | 4.1% | 4.76 | 4.42 | +3.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 35 | 33 | 200 | 847 | 176 | 55 | 35 | 96% | 5.8 | 20.8% | 6.5% | 14.3% | 4.1% | 4.76 | 4.42 | +2.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 65 | 61 | 313 | 1249 | 275 | 87 | 34 | 94% | 4.8 | 22.0% | 7.0% | 15.0% | 2.7% | 3.25 | 3.62 | +3.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 41 | 39 | 200 | 797 | 176 | 56 | 22 | 94% | 4.8 | 22.0% | 7.0% | 15.0% | 2.7% | 3.25 | 3.62 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAScranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders · 135 IPFIP 2.69 → 3.03 (+0.34)K% 28.0% → 24.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.96% | — | ×0.860 | 24.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.41% | — | ×0.900 | 6.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.85% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 2.04% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.69 → 3.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAScranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders · 77 IPFIP 4.26 → 4.50 (+0.23)K% 22.8% → 19.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.76% | — | ×0.860 | 19.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.69% | — | ×0.900 | 6.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.85% | ÷1.070 | ×1.100 | 3.96% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 114).
Result: FIP 4.26 → 4.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AASomerset Patriots · 54 IPFIP 2.26 → 2.81 (+0.56)K% 24.8% → 20.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.76% | — | ×0.810 | 20.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.71% | — | ×1.100 | 6.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.95% | ÷1.030 | ×1.200 | 1.11% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 2.26 → 2.81, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Hudson Valley Renegades · 31 IPFIP 2.29 → 3.19 (+0.90)K% 29.2% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.17% | — | ×0.770 | 22.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.83% | — | ×1.150 | 6.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.67% | ÷1.006 | ×1.250 | 2.07% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 2.29 → 3.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.2 | 74 | 20.9% | 6.2% | 1.42 | 4.50 |
| Rich Monteleone ('87-'96, 2 WAR*) | 1.8 | 71 | 18.7%* | 7.5%* | 1.39* | 4.03* |
| Mark Huismann ('83-'91, 1 WAR*) | 1.5 | 74 | 23.8%* | 6.5%* | 1.30* | 4.49* |
| Tim Crews ('87-'92, 3 WAR*) | 2.1 | 71 | 20.8%* | 6.2%* | 1.09* | 4.11* |
| Blas Minor ('97) | 1.1 | 75 | 19.2% | 7.3% | 1.16 | 4.40 |
| Nelson Cruz ('03) | 1.7 | 58 | 18.2% | 7.2% | 1.52 | 5.04 |
| Adam Morgan ('21) | 1.8 | 62 | 20.8% | 7.2% | 1.58 | 4.80 |