George Klassen
P Salt Lake Bees| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | MIX3 levels | 22 | 22 | 93 | 3.10 | 2.38 | 35.2% | 12.0% | — | K 27.0% · BB 13.6% · FIP 3.50 |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 25 | 109 | 5.22 | 2.89 | 27.7% | 9.7% | — | K 22.2% · BB 11.0% · FIP 3.73 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 25 | 118 | 3.89 | 4.12 | 21.5% | 12.9% | 1.8 | K 19.2% · BB 12.0% · FIP 4.25 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBLAA | 17 | 17 | 100 | 4.62 | 4.58 | 23.9% | 12.7% | 1.0 | |
| 2028PROJ82% MLB | 26 | MLBLAA | 19 | 19 | 114 | 4.57 | 4.55 | 24.0% | 12.1% | 1.2 | |
| 2029PROJ87% MLB | 27 | MLBLAA | 17 | 17 | 100 | 4.56 | 4.56 | 23.9% | 11.9% | 1.0 |
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 22 | 22 | 93 | 383 | 135 | 46 | 5 | 100% | 4.2 | 27.0% | 13.6% | 13.3% | 1.7% | 3.10 | 3.50 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 22 | 22 | 93 | 383 | 135 | 46 | 5 | 100% | 4.2 | 27.0% | 13.6% | 13.3% | 1.7% | 3.10 | 3.50 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 22 | 22 | 93 | 383 | 135 | 46 | 5 | 100% | 4.2 | 35.2% | 12.0% | 23.2% | 1.3% | 3.10 | 2.38 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 109 | 484 | 134 | 47 | 8 | 100% | 4.3 | 22.2% | 11.0% | 11.2% | 2.0% | 5.22 | 3.73 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 109 | 484 | 134 | 47 | 8 | 100% | 4.3 | 22.2% | 11.0% | 11.2% | 2.0% | 5.22 | 3.73 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 109 | 484 | 134 | 47 | 8 | 100% | 4.3 | 27.7% | 9.7% | 18.0% | 1.7% | 5.22 | 2.89 | — |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 118 | 520 | 112 | 67 | 11 | 100% | 4.7 | 19.2% | 12.0% | 7.2% | 2.3% | 3.89 | 4.25 | +1.6 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 118 | 520 | 112 | 67 | 11 | 100% | 4.7 | 19.2% | 12.0% | 7.2% | 2.3% | 3.89 | 4.25 | +1.6 |
| 2026 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 25 | 118 | 520 | 112 | 67 | 11 | 100% | 4.7 | 21.5% | 12.9% | 8.7% | 2.1% | 3.89 | 4.12 | +1.8 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 6 | 6 | 27 | 125 | 24 | 21 | 2 | 100% | 4.5 | 19.2% | 16.8% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 3.67 | 4.62 | +0.2 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | LAA | 17 | 17 | 100 | 422 | 101 | 53 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.9% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 2.8% | 4.62 | 4.58 | +1.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAA | 23 | 23 | 138 | 583 | 140 | 71 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.0% | 12.1% | 11.9% | 2.8% | 4.54 | 4.52 | +1.4 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB MLE | LAA | 19 | 19 | 115 | 486 | 116 | 58 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 23.9% | 11.9% | 12.0% | 2.9% | 4.53 | 4.53 | +1.2 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB MLE | LAA | 18 | 18 | 110 | 466 | 110 | 55 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 23.6% | 11.8% | 11.8% | 3.0% | 4.57 | 4.60 | +1.0 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB MLE | LAA | 17 | 17 | 101 | 427 | 98 | 51 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.0% | 11.9% | 11.1% | 3.1% | 4.68 | 4.75 | +0.8 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB MLE | LAA | 15 | 15 | 91 | 383 | 86 | 47 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.3% | 12.2% | 10.1% | 3.3% | 4.85 | 4.96 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB MLE | LAA | 13 | 13 | 80 | 339 | 73 | 43 | 12 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.6% | 12.6% | 9.0% | 3.5% | 5.06 | 5.19 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAA | 19 | 19 | 114 | 481 | 116 | 58 | 14 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.0% | 12.1% | 11.9% | 2.8% | 4.57 | 4.55 | +1.2 |
| 2029 | 27 | MLB CTX | LAA | 17 | 17 | 100 | 422 | 101 | 50 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.9% | 11.9% | 12.0% | 2.9% | 4.56 | 4.56 | +1.0 |
| 2030 | 28 | MLB CTX | LAA | 17 | 17 | 100 | 422 | 100 | 50 | 13 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.6% | 11.8% | 11.8% | 3.0% | 4.60 | 4.63 | +0.9 |
| 2031 | 29 | MLB CTX | LAA | 16 | 16 | 93 | 393 | 90 | 47 | 12 | 100% | 5.8 | 23.0% | 11.9% | 11.1% | 3.2% | 4.71 | 4.78 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 30 | MLB CTX | LAA | 14 | 14 | 84 | 355 | 79 | 43 | 12 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.3% | 12.2% | 10.1% | 3.4% | 4.89 | 5.00 | +0.4 |
| 2033 | 31 | MLB CTX | LAA | 12 | 12 | 75 | 317 | 68 | 40 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.6% | 12.6% | 9.0% | 3.6% | 5.10 | 5.23 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 100 | 100 | 593 | 2515 | 578 | 309 | 77 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.0% | 12.3% | 10.7% | 3.0% | 4.67 | 4.39 | +7.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 848 | 195 | 104 | 26 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.0% | 12.3% | 10.7% | 3.0% | 4.67 | 4.39 | +2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 72 | 72 | 320 | 1387 | 310 | 168 | 28 | 100% | 4.4 | 22.4% | 12.1% | 10.3% | 2.0% | 4.11 | 3.86 | +5.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 45 | 45 | 200 | 868 | 194 | 105 | 18 | 100% | 4.4 | 22.4% | 12.1% | 10.3% | 2.0% | 4.11 | 3.86 | +1.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAASalt Lake Bees · 91 IPFIP 3.94 → 4.19 (+0.24)K% 22.3% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.28% | — | ×0.860 | 19.16% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.65% | — | ×0.900 | 10.48% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.28% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 2.51% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.94 → 4.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 103 IPFIP 3.01 → 3.73 (+0.73)K% 27.4% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.39% | — | ×0.810 | 22.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.100 | 11.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.74% | ÷1.028 | ×1.200 | 2.03% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 106).
Result: FIP 3.01 → 3.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAASalt Lake Bees · 6 IPFIP 0.81 → 1.15 (+0.34)K% 33.3% → 28.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.33% | — | ×0.860 | 28.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.17% | — | ×0.900 | 3.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.989 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 0.81 → 1.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AInland Empire 66ers · 43 IPFIP 1.16 → 2.41 (+1.26)K% 40.6% → 30.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 40.61% | — | ×0.740 | 30.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.09% | — | ×1.180 | 10.73% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.61% | ÷0.882 | ×1.300 | 0.89% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 1.16 → 2.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 29 IPFIP 3.76 → 4.64 (+0.87)K% 28.3% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.35% | — | ×0.810 | 22.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.32% | — | ×1.100 | 19.06% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.57% | ÷0.976 | ×1.200 | 1.94% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 3.76 → 4.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 21 IPFIP 2.59 → 3.88 (+1.29)K% 35.2% → 27.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.16% | — | ×0.770 | 27.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.89% | — | ×1.150 | 11.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.20% | ÷0.926 | ×1.250 | 2.97% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP 2.59 → 3.88, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 4.0 | 100 | 23.2% | 12.3% | 1.14 | 4.63 |
| Ken Kravec ('75-'82, 5 WAR*) | 4.3 | 123 | 23.6%* | 10.7%* | 1.11* | 4.73* |
| Scipio Spinks ('69-'73, 2 WAR*) | 1.0 | 67 | 23.7%* | 12.2%* | 1.04* | 4.52* |
| Daisuke Matsuzaka ('14) | 4.0 | 99 | 20.9% | 11.2% | 0.97 | 4.45 |
| Les Cain ('68-'72, 2 WAR*) | 1.9 | 93 | 24.6%* | 12.9%* | 1.00* | 4.66* |
| John Maine ('13) | 3.0 | 99 | 19.5% | 10.5% | 1.23 | 4.45 |
| Kazuhisa Ishii ('02-'05, 1 WAR*) | 2.8 | 141 | 19.8%* | 13.6%* | 1.14* | 4.72* |