Luke Gabrysh
P Brooklyn Cyclones| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 21 | 19 | 78 | 3.33 | 3.81 | 18.6% | 10.1% | — | K 13.8% · BB 11.8% · FIP 4.67 |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 24 | 23 | 93 | 5.30 | 3.95 | 29.4% | 10.2% | — | K 22.8% · BB 11.7% · FIP 5.12 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBNYM | — | — | 0 | 5.17 | 5.17 | 21.9% | 13.3% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 25 | MLBNYM | 7 | 7 | 39 | 5.00 | 4.94 | 22.7% | 12.3% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ66% MLB | 26 | MLBNYM | 10 | 10 | 60 | 4.89 | 4.85 | 23.1% | 11.9% | 0.4 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 19 | 78 | 318 | 59 | 32 | 6 | 90% | 3.7 | 13.8% | 11.8% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 3.33 | 4.67 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 19 | 78 | 318 | 59 | 32 | 6 | 90% | 3.7 | 13.8% | 11.8% | 2.0% | 2.3% | 3.33 | 4.67 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 19 | 78 | 318 | 59 | 32 | 6 | 90% | 3.7 | 18.6% | 10.1% | 8.5% | 1.9% | 3.33 | 3.81 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 23 | 93 | 412 | 121 | 42 | 15 | 96% | 3.9 | 22.8% | 11.7% | 11.1% | 4.5% | 5.30 | 5.12 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 24 | 23 | 93 | 412 | 121 | 42 | 15 | 96% | 3.9 | 22.8% | 11.7% | 11.1% | 4.5% | 5.30 | 5.12 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 24 | 23 | 93 | 412 | 121 | 42 | 15 | 96% | 3.9 | 29.4% | 10.2% | 19.2% | 3.6% | 5.30 | 3.95 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | NYM | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.9% | 13.3% | 8.6% | 3.4% | 5.17 | 5.17 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | NYM | 15 | 15 | 90 | 380 | 86 | 47 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.7% | 12.3% | 10.4% | 3.3% | 5.00 | 4.94 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | NYM | 15 | 15 | 90 | 380 | 88 | 45 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.1% | 11.9% | 11.2% | 3.3% | 4.89 | 4.85 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | NYM | 14 | 14 | 86 | 362 | 83 | 43 | 12 | 100% | 6.1 | 23.0% | 11.8% | 11.3% | 3.3% | 4.86 | 4.85 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | NYM | 14 | 14 | 81 | 342 | 78 | 40 | 12 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.9% | 11.8% | 11.1% | 3.4% | 4.89 | 4.92 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | NYM | 13 | 13 | 75 | 317 | 72 | 38 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.6% | 12.0% | 10.6% | 3.6% | 4.99 | 5.06 | +0.3 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | NYM | 11 | 11 | 68 | 287 | 64 | 35 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.3% | 12.3% | 10.0% | 3.8% | 5.14 | 5.23 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | NYM | 7 | 7 | 39 | 165 | 37 | 20 | 5 | 100% | 5.6 | 22.7% | 12.3% | 10.4% | 3.3% | 5.00 | 4.94 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | NYM | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 58 | 30 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.1% | 11.9% | 11.2% | 3.3% | 4.89 | 4.85 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | NYM | 11 | 11 | 66 | 279 | 64 | 33 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.0% | 11.8% | 11.3% | 3.3% | 4.86 | 4.85 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | NYM | 11 | 11 | 68 | 287 | 66 | 34 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.9% | 11.8% | 11.1% | 3.4% | 4.89 | 4.92 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | NYM | 11 | 11 | 66 | 279 | 63 | 33 | 10 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.6% | 12.0% | 10.6% | 3.6% | 4.99 | 5.06 | +0.3 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | NYM | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 57 | 32 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.3% | 12.3% | 10.0% | 3.8% | 5.13 | 5.22 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 60 | 60 | 360 | 1520 | 346 | 182 | 53 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.8% | 12.0% | 10.8% | 3.5% | 4.95 | 4.59 | +3.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 192 | 101 | 29 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.8% | 12.0% | 10.8% | 3.5% | 4.95 | 4.59 | +1.9 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 45 | 42 | 172 | 730 | 138 | 86 | 26 | 93% | 3.8 | 18.9% | 11.7% | 7.2% | 3.5% | 4.40 | 4.93 | +2.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 52 | 49 | 200 | 850 | 161 | 100 | 30 | 93% | 3.8 | 18.9% | 11.7% | 7.2% | 3.5% | 4.40 | 4.93 | +1.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Brooklyn Cyclones · 76 IPFIP 3.64 → 4.88 (+1.25)K% 30.8% → 23.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.77% | — | ×0.770 | 23.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.65% | — | ×1.150 | 12.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.25% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 4.07% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.64 → 4.88, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 17 IPFIP 5.15 → 6.22 (+1.06)K% 23.0% → 18.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.97% | — | ×0.810 | 18.61% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.11% | — | ×1.100 | 8.92% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.41% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 6.49% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.15 → 6.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AClearwater Threshers · 61 IPFIP 3.82 → 4.71 (+0.89)K% 19.9% → 14.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.92% | — | ×0.740 | 14.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.16% | — | ×1.180 | 11.99% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.03% | ÷1.083 | ×1.300 | 2.44% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 117).
Result: FIP 3.82 → 4.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 17 IPFIP 3.92 → 4.52 (+0.60)K% 13.9% → 10.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.89% | — | ×0.770 | 10.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.72% | — | ×1.150 | 11.18% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.39% | ÷1.045 | ×1.250 | 1.66% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 3.92 → 4.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.9 | 83 | 22.6% | 12.2% | 1.33 | 4.99 |
| David West ('88-'98, 1 WAR*) | 2.8 | 71 | 22.1%* | 12.1%* | 1.28* | 4.79* |
| Tim Birtsas ('85-'90, -0 WAR*) | 1.6 | 82 | 21.4%* | 11.7%* | 1.31* | 4.63* |
| Britt Reames ('06) | 1.1 | 73 | 20.7% | 12.0% | 1.32 | 5.28 |
| Calvin Schiraldi ('84-'91, 2 WAR*) | 2.8 | 92 | 25.3%* | 11.1%* | 1.35* | 4.71* |
| Jake Faria ('23) | 1.0 | 68 | 20.9% | 10.3% | 1.32 | 4.87 |
| Paul Spoljaric ('00) | 1.4 | 69 | 22.1% | 12.9% | 1.33 | 5.52 |