Trent Palmer
P New Hampshire Fisher Cats| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 13 | 13 | 55 | 3.90 | 3.73 | 27.8% | 9.3% | — | K 22.0% · BB 10.4% · FIP 4.79 | |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 4 | 3 | 8 | 2.35 | 3.75 | 23.5% | 20.6% | — | K 23.5% · BB 20.6% · FIP 3.72 | |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 15 | 5 | 27 | 9.88 | 4.67 | 17.5% | 21.7% | — | K 12.8% · BB 22.2% · FIP 4.83 | |
| 2025 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBTOR | — | — | 0 | 4.97 | 4.97 | 20.7% | 12.9% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 29 | MLBTOR | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4.99 | 5.04 | 20.7% | 12.8% | 0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Dunedin Blue Jays | 16 | 16 | 63 | 266 | 83 | 42 | 0 | 100% | 3.9 | 23.1% | 18.6% | 4.5% | 0.0% | 3.00 | 3.51 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A RAW | Dunedin Blue Jays | 16 | 16 | 63 | 266 | 83 | 42 | 0 | 100% | 3.9 | 31.2% | 15.8% | 15.4% | 0.0% | 3.00 | 2.47 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 13 | 13 | 55 | 248 | 69 | 23 | 8 | 100% | 4.3 | 22.0% | 10.4% | 11.6% | 4.1% | 3.90 | 4.79 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 13 | 13 | 55 | 248 | 69 | 23 | 8 | 100% | 4.3 | 27.8% | 9.3% | 18.5% | 3.2% | 3.90 | 3.73 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 4 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 75% | 1.9 | 23.5% | 20.6% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 2.35 | 3.72 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 4 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 75% | 1.9 | 23.5% | 20.6% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 2.35 | 3.75 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 15 | 5 | 27 | 143 | 25 | 31 | 0 | 33% | 1.8 | 12.8% | 22.2% | -9.4% | 0.0% | 9.88 | 4.83 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 15 | 5 | 27 | 143 | 25 | 31 | 0 | 33% | 1.8 | 12.8% | 22.2% | -9.4% | 0.0% | 9.88 | 4.83 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 15 | 5 | 27 | 143 | 25 | 31 | 0 | 33% | 1.8 | 17.5% | 21.7% | -4.2% | 0.0% | 9.88 | 4.67 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | TOR | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.7% | 12.9% | 7.8% | 2.9% | 4.97 | 4.97 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | TOR | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 18 | 11 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 20.7% | 12.8% | 8.0% | 3.1% | 4.99 | 5.04 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | TOR | 1 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.7% | 12.8% | 8.0% | 3.1% | 4.99 | 5.04 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 6 | 26 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.7% | 12.8% | 8.0% | 3.1% | 4.99 | 4.66 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 160 | 96 | 32 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.7% | 12.8% | 8.0% | 3.1% | 4.99 | 4.66 | +1.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 48 | 37 | 153 | 691 | 142 | 114 | 10 | 77% | 3.2 | 20.6% | 16.5% | 4.1% | 1.5% | 4.52 | 4.25 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 63 | 48 | 200 | 901 | 185 | 149 | 13 | 77% | 3.2 | 20.6% | 16.5% | 4.1% | 1.5% | 4.52 | 4.25 | +0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 22 IPFIP 4.32 → 4.83 (+0.51)K% 15.8% → 12.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.79% | — | ×0.810 | 12.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.18% | — | ×1.100 | 22.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.145 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 129).
Result: FIP 4.32 → 4.83, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ADunedin Blue Jays · 5 IPFIP 4.56 → 5.71 (+1.16)K% 24.1% → 17.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.14% | — | ×0.740 | 17.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 27.59% | — | ×1.180 | 32.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.003 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 4.56 → 5.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 32 IPFIP 3.66 → 4.39 (+0.73)K% 24.3% → 19.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.26% | — | ×0.810 | 19.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.03% | — | ×1.100 | 12.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.21% | ÷1.027 | ×1.200 | 2.58% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 3.66 → 4.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Vancouver Canadians · 24 IPFIP 3.74 → 5.27 (+1.53)K% 32.1% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.14% | — | ×0.770 | 24.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.14% | — | ×1.150 | 8.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.46% | ÷0.952 | ×1.250 | 5.86% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.74 → 5.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ADunedin Blue Jays · 63 IPFIP 2.47 → 3.51 (+1.05)K% 31.2% → 23.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.20% | — | ×0.740 | 23.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.79% | — | ×1.180 | 18.63% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.010 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP 2.47 → 3.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).