Troy Miller
P Binghamton Rumble Ponies| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 9 | 8 | 45 | 5.00 | 4.30 | 23.0% | 8.9% | — | K 18.3% · BB 10.0% · FIP 5.30 | |
| 2023 | 26 | AANYM | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7.36 | 6.92 | 23.5% | 17.6% | — | K 23.5% · BB 17.6% · FIP 6.58 | |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 8 | 6 | 23 | 7.94 | 6.50 | 18.5% | 12.0% | — | K 15.3% · BB 11.0% · FIP 5.83 | |
| 2025 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBNYM | — | — | 0 | 4.53 | 4.53 | 21.7% | 9.6% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 31 | MLBNYM | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4.63 | 4.71 | 21.4% | 9.9% | 0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | 23 | 22 | 103 | 463 | 75 | 50 | 10 | 96% | 4.5 | 12.0% | 12.7% | -0.8% | 2.5% | 4.81 | 5.09 | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A RAW | Lansing Lugnuts | 23 | 22 | 103 | 463 | 75 | 50 | 10 | 96% | 4.5 | 16.2% | 10.8% | 5.4% | 2.2% | 4.81 | 4.36 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 9 | 8 | 45 | 191 | 44 | 17 | 7 | 89% | 5.0 | 18.3% | 10.0% | 8.3% | 4.5% | 5.00 | 5.30 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 9 | 8 | 45 | 191 | 44 | 17 | 7 | 89% | 5.0 | 23.0% | 8.9% | 14.1% | 3.7% | 5.00 | 4.30 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | AA MLE | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | 1 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 3.7 | 23.5% | 17.6% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 7.36 | 6.58 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | AA RAW | Binghamton Rumble Ponies | 1 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 3.7 | 23.5% | 17.6% | 5.9% | 5.9% | 7.36 | 6.92 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 8 | 6 | 23 | 108 | 20 | 13 | 6 | 75% | 2.8 | 15.3% | 11.0% | 4.3% | 4.8% | 7.94 | 5.83 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 8 | 6 | 23 | 108 | 20 | 13 | 6 | 75% | 2.8 | 15.3% | 11.0% | 4.3% | 4.8% | 7.94 | 5.83 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 8 | 6 | 23 | 108 | 20 | 13 | 6 | 75% | 2.8 | 18.5% | 12.0% | 6.5% | 5.6% | 7.94 | 6.50 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB | NYM | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.7% | 9.6% | 12.0% | 3.0% | 4.53 | 4.53 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | NYM | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 18 | 8 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 21.4% | 9.9% | 11.5% | 3.3% | 4.63 | 4.71 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | NYM | 1 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.4% | 9.9% | 11.5% | 3.3% | 4.63 | 4.71 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 6 | 26 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 6.3 | 21.5% | 9.9% | 11.5% | 3.3% | 4.63 | 4.33 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 192 | 96 | 32 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.5% | 9.9% | 11.5% | 3.3% | 4.63 | 4.33 | +2.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 41 | 37 | 174 | 779 | 111 | 93 | 26 | 90% | 4.3 | 14.2% | 11.9% | 2.3% | 3.4% | 5.32 | 5.27 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 47 | 42 | 200 | 894 | 127 | 107 | 30 | 90% | 4.3 | 14.2% | 11.9% | 2.3% | 3.4% | 5.32 | 5.27 | +1.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 20 IPFIP 4.60 → 5.83 (+1.23)K% 18.9% → 15.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.89% | — | ×0.810 | 15.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.100 | 11.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.33% | ÷0.834 | ×1.200 | 4.80% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 67).
Result: FIP 4.60 → 5.83, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AABinghamton Rumble Ponies · 30 IPFIP 4.72 → 5.64 (+0.92)K% 20.3% → 16.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.30% | — | ×0.810 | 16.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.77% | — | ×1.100 | 7.44% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.51% | ÷0.995 | ×1.200 | 5.44% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 4.72 → 5.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Vancouver Canadians · 15 IPFIP 3.32 → 4.50 (+1.19)K% 29.3% → 22.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.31% | — | ×0.770 | 22.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.79% | — | ×1.150 | 15.86% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.72% | ÷0.909 | ×1.250 | 2.37% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.32 → 4.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ALansing Lugnuts · 103 IPFIP 4.29 → 5.09 (+0.80)K% 16.2% → 12.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.20% | — | ×0.740 | 11.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.80% | — | ×1.180 | 12.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.16% | ÷1.113 | ×1.300 | 2.52% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 123).
Result: FIP 4.29 → 5.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).