Connor Staine
P Hartford Yard Goats| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24 | AACOL | 25 | 25 | 106 | 4.91 | 4.97 | 17.3% | 11.8% | — | K 14.0% · BB 13.0% · FIP 5.22 |
| 2026 | 25 | AACOL | 25 | 22 | 123 | 4.60 | 4.35 | 22.2% | 11.4% | — | K 17.9% · BB 12.5% · FIP 5.16 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBCOL | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5.82 | 5.82 | 15.2% | 14.7% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 27 | MLBCOL | 5 | 5 | 30 | 5.68 | 5.70 | 15.9% | 14.0% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ60% MLB | 28 | MLBCOL | 7 | 7 | 41 | 5.63 | 5.67 | 16.2% | 13.7% | -0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 22 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 21 | 20 | 94 | 418 | 93 | 28 | 8 | 95% | 4.5 | 16.5% | 7.9% | 8.6% | 2.1% | 5.25 | 3.86 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A RAW | Fresno Grizzlies | 21 | 20 | 94 | 418 | 93 | 28 | 8 | 95% | 4.5 | 22.2% | 6.7% | 15.6% | 1.9% | 5.25 | 3.12 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | Spokane Indians | 20 | 19 | 90 | 383 | 101 | 42 | 11 | 95% | 4.5 | 20.3% | 12.6% | 7.7% | 3.3% | 4.48 | 4.80 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | Spokane Indians | 20 | 19 | 90 | 383 | 101 | 42 | 11 | 95% | 4.5 | 20.3% | 12.6% | 7.7% | 3.3% | 4.48 | 4.80 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ RAW | Spokane Indians | 20 | 19 | 90 | 383 | 101 | 42 | 11 | 95% | 4.5 | 26.4% | 11.0% | 15.4% | 2.9% | 4.48 | 3.84 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Hartford Yard Goats | 25 | 25 | 106 | 475 | 82 | 56 | 15 | 100% | 4.3 | 14.0% | 13.0% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 4.91 | 5.22 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Hartford Yard Goats | 25 | 25 | 106 | 475 | 82 | 56 | 15 | 100% | 4.3 | 14.0% | 13.0% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 4.91 | 5.22 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA RAW | Hartford Yard Goats | 25 | 25 | 106 | 475 | 82 | 56 | 15 | 100% | 4.3 | 17.3% | 11.8% | 5.5% | 3.2% | 4.91 | 4.97 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Hartford Yard Goats | 25 | 22 | 123 | 528 | 117 | 60 | 16 | 88% | 4.9 | 17.9% | 12.5% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 4.60 | 5.16 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA MLE | Hartford Yard Goats | 25 | 22 | 123 | 528 | 117 | 60 | 16 | 88% | 4.9 | 17.9% | 12.5% | 5.4% | 3.6% | 4.60 | 5.16 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | AA RAW | Hartford Yard Goats | 25 | 22 | 123 | 528 | 117 | 60 | 16 | 88% | 4.9 | 22.2% | 11.4% | 10.8% | 3.0% | 4.60 | 4.35 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | COL | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 2.0 | 15.2% | 14.7% | 0.6% | 3.2% | 5.82 | 5.82 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | COL | 13 | 13 | 81 | 342 | 54 | 48 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 15.9% | 14.0% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 5.68 | 5.70 | -0.3 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | COL | 11 | 11 | 69 | 290 | 47 | 40 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 16.2% | 13.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | 5.63 | 5.67 | -0.2 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB MLE | COL | 10 | 10 | 62 | 261 | 43 | 36 | 9 | 100% | 6.2 | 16.3% | 13.6% | 2.7% | 3.5% | 5.67 | 5.73 | -0.2 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB MLE | COL | 9 | 9 | 56 | 238 | 38 | 33 | 9 | 100% | 6.3 | 16.1% | 13.8% | 2.3% | 3.7% | 5.78 | 5.87 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | COL | 5 | 5 | 30 | 127 | 20 | 18 | 4 | 100% | 6.0 | 15.9% | 14.0% | 1.9% | 3.3% | 5.68 | 5.70 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | COL | 7 | 7 | 41 | 173 | 28 | 24 | 6 | 100% | 5.9 | 16.2% | 13.7% | 2.5% | 3.3% | 5.63 | 5.67 | -0.1 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB CTX | COL | 7 | 7 | 44 | 186 | 30 | 25 | 6 | 100% | 6.3 | 16.3% | 13.6% | 2.7% | 3.5% | 5.67 | 5.73 | -0.2 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB CTX | COL | 7 | 7 | 44 | 186 | 30 | 26 | 7 | 100% | 6.3 | 16.1% | 13.8% | 2.3% | 3.7% | 5.78 | 5.87 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 27 | 27 | 159 | 672 | 108 | 92 | 23 | 100% | 5.9 | 16.1% | 13.8% | 2.4% | 3.4% | 5.69 | 5.37 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 136 | 116 | 29 | 100% | 6.0 | 16.1% | 13.8% | 2.4% | 3.4% | 5.69 | 5.37 | +0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 91 | 86 | 414 | 1804 | 308 | 209 | 55 | 95% | 4.6 | 17.1% | 11.6% | 5.5% | 3.0% | 4.80 | 4.80 | -1.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 44 | 42 | 200 | 871 | 149 | 101 | 27 | 95% | 4.6 | 17.1% | 11.6% | 5.5% | 3.0% | 4.80 | 4.80 | -0.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAHartford Yard Goats · 123 IPFIP 4.33 → 5.16 (+0.83)K% 22.2% → 17.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.16% | — | ×0.810 | 17.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.36% | — | ×1.100 | 12.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 3.64% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.33 → 5.16, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAHartford Yard Goats · 106 IPFIP 4.87 → 5.22 (+0.35)K% 17.3% → 14.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.26% | — | ×0.810 | 13.98% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.79% | — | ×1.100 | 12.97% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.16% | ÷1.255 | ×1.200 | 3.02% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 151).
Result: FIP 4.87 → 5.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Spokane Indians · 90 IPFIP 3.84 → 4.80 (+0.96)K% 26.4% → 20.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.37% | — | ×0.770 | 20.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.97% | — | ×1.150 | 12.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.87% | ÷1.086 | ×1.250 | 3.31% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 117).
Result: FIP 3.84 → 4.80, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AFresno Grizzlies · 94 IPFIP 3.12 → 3.86 (+0.74)K% 22.2% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.25% | — | ×0.740 | 16.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.70% | — | ×1.180 | 7.90% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.91% | ÷1.186 | ×1.300 | 2.10% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 3.12 → 3.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.7 | 70 | 15.9% | 14.0% | 1.30 | 5.72 |
| Richie Lewis ('98) | 1.5 | 59 | 18.1% | 14.1% | 1.38 | 4.88 |
| Matt Perisho ('05) | 1.4 | 69 | 15.2% | 12.2% | 1.37 | 6.39 |
| Paul Spoljaric ('00) | 1.4 | 69 | 22.1% | 12.9% | 1.33 | 5.52 |
| Darrel Akerfelds ('86-'91, -3 WAR*) | 1.2 | 78 | 15.8%* | 11.9%* | 1.61* | 5.40* |
| Daryl Patterson ('68-'74, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 46 | 18.3%* | 11.2%* | 1.27* | 5.03* |
| Jim Winn ('83-'88, -1 WAR*) | 1.5 | 77 | 15.1%* | 11.0%* | 1.09* | 4.96* |