Jarrod Cande
P Hartford Yard Goats| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 23 | A+COL | 19 | 19 | 105 | 3.25 | 3.50 | 25.3% | 6.0% | — | K 19.5% · BB 6.9% · FIP 4.46 |
| 2024 | 24 | AACOL | 23 | 21 | 106 | 4.15 | 4.44 | 20.6% | 10.0% | — | K 16.7% · BB 11.0% · FIP 5.42 |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX3 levels | 17 | 0 | 25 | 5.76 | 5.30 | 15.7% | 14.9% | — | K 11.7% · BB 15.3% · FIP 5.72 |
| 2027PROJ | 27 | MLBCOL | — | — | 0 | 5.44 | 5.44 | 15.8% | 12.7% | — | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 28 | MLBCOL | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5.38 | 5.41 | 16.4% | 12.5% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 21 | ROK MLE | ACL Rockies | 4 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0.9 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 2.45 | 0.99 | — |
| 2021 | 21 | ROK RAW | ACL Rockies | 4 | 0 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0.9 | 25.0% | 0.0% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 2.45 | 0.92 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 19 | 15 | 80 | 356 | 92 | 22 | 9 | 79% | 4.2 | 19.1% | 7.3% | 11.8% | 3.5% | 4.93 | 4.31 | — |
| 2022 | 22 | A RAW | Fresno Grizzlies | 19 | 15 | 80 | 356 | 92 | 22 | 9 | 79% | 4.2 | 25.8% | 6.2% | 19.7% | 2.5% | 4.93 | 3.09 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ MLE | Spokane Indians | 19 | 19 | 105 | 431 | 109 | 26 | 14 | 100% | 5.5 | 19.5% | 6.9% | 12.5% | 3.9% | 3.25 | 4.46 | — |
| 2023 | 23 | A+ RAW | Spokane Indians | 19 | 19 | 105 | 431 | 109 | 26 | 14 | 100% | 5.5 | 25.3% | 6.0% | 19.3% | 3.2% | 3.25 | 3.50 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | Hartford Yard Goats | 23 | 21 | 106 | 461 | 95 | 46 | 15 | 91% | 4.6 | 16.7% | 11.0% | 5.7% | 4.3% | 4.15 | 5.42 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA MLE | Hartford Yard Goats | 23 | 21 | 106 | 461 | 95 | 46 | 15 | 91% | 4.6 | 16.7% | 11.0% | 5.7% | 4.3% | 4.15 | 5.42 | — |
| 2024 | 24 | AA RAW | Hartford Yard Goats | 23 | 21 | 106 | 461 | 95 | 46 | 15 | 91% | 4.6 | 20.6% | 10.0% | 10.6% | 3.3% | 4.15 | 4.44 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 17 | 0 | 25 | 121 | 19 | 18 | 3 | 0% | 1.5 | 11.7% | 15.3% | -3.6% | 3.0% | 5.76 | 5.72 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 17 | 0 | 25 | 121 | 19 | 18 | 3 | 0% | 1.5 | 11.7% | 15.3% | -3.6% | 3.0% | 5.76 | 5.72 | — |
| 2026 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 17 | 0 | 25 | 121 | 19 | 18 | 3 | 0% | 1.5 | 15.7% | 14.9% | 0.8% | 2.5% | 5.76 | 5.30 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 27 | MLB | COL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15.8% | 12.7% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 5.44 | 5.44 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 28 | MLB MLE | COL | 3 | 3 | 19 | 80 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 100% | 6.3 | 16.4% | 12.5% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 5.38 | 5.41 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 28 | MLB CTX | COL | 1 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 7.0 | 16.4% | 12.5% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 5.38 | 5.41 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 7.1 | 16.4% | 12.5% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 5.38 | 5.03 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 32 | 32 | 200 | 844 | 141 | 113 | 28 | 100% | 6.2 | 16.4% | 12.5% | 3.9% | 3.2% | 5.38 | 5.03 | +0.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 82 | 55 | 321 | 1385 | 247 | 125 | 52 | 67% | 3.9 | 17.8% | 9.0% | 8.8% | 3.8% | 4.15 | 4.81 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 51 | 34 | 200 | 864 | 154 | 78 | 33 | 67% | 3.9 | 17.8% | 9.0% | 8.8% | 3.8% | 4.15 | 4.81 | -0.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAHartford Yard Goats · 12 IPFIP 5.65 → 6.35 (+0.70)K% 10.3% → 8.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 10.34% | — | ×0.810 | 8.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.07% | — | ×1.100 | 13.28% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.45% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 4.14% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.65 → 6.35, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 11 IPFIP 5.03 → 5.09 (+0.06)K% 17.5% → 15.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.54% | — | ×0.860 | 15.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.30% | — | ×0.900 | 17.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.75% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 1.93% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.03 → 5.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAHartford Yard Goats · 106 IPFIP 4.41 → 5.42 (+1.01)K% 20.6% → 16.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.61% | — | ×0.810 | 16.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.98% | — | ×1.100 | 10.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.25% | ÷0.916 | ×1.200 | 4.26% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 4.41 → 5.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Spokane Indians · 105 IPFIP 3.51 → 4.46 (+0.95)K% 25.3% → 19.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.29% | — | ×0.770 | 19.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.03% | — | ×1.150 | 6.94% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.25% | ÷1.047 | ×1.250 | 3.88% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 3.51 → 4.46, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AFresno Grizzlies · 80 IPFIP 3.09 → 4.31 (+1.22)K% 25.8% → 19.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.84% | — | ×0.740 | 19.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.18% | — | ×1.180 | 7.29% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.53% | ÷0.947 | ×1.300 | 3.47% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 3.09 → 4.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).