Hayden Minton
P West Michigan Whitecaps| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | ADET | 23 | 21 | 93 | 4.65 | 3.06 | 26.6% | 10.4% | — | K 19.7% · BB 12.3% · FIP 4.04 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 23 | 18 | 101 | 3.22 | 2.96 | 25.1% | 6.1% | — | K 19.1% · BB 7.0% · FIP 4.16 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX3 levels | 30 | 19 | 95 | 3.59 | 4.00 | 25.8% | 10.3% | — | K 19.7% · BB 11.4% · FIP 4.97 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBDET | — | — | 0 | 4.83 | 4.83 | 18.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 27 | MLBDET | 4 | 4 | 27 | 4.73 | 4.74 | 19.2% | 9.6% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ59% MLB | 28 | MLBDET | 7 | 7 | 40 | 4.74 | 4.77 | 19.3% | 9.6% | 0.3 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 0.7 | 16.7% | 33.3% | -16.7% | 8.3% | 27.00 | 10.49 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0% | 0.7 | 16.7% | 33.3% | -16.7% | 8.3% | 27.00 | 18.85 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 23 | 21 | 93 | 433 | 115 | 45 | 7 | 91% | 4.0 | 19.7% | 12.3% | 7.4% | 1.9% | 4.65 | 4.04 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 23 | 21 | 93 | 433 | 115 | 45 | 7 | 91% | 4.0 | 19.7% | 12.3% | 7.4% | 1.9% | 4.65 | 4.04 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 23 | 21 | 93 | 433 | 115 | 45 | 7 | 91% | 4.0 | 26.6% | 10.4% | 16.2% | 1.6% | 4.65 | 3.06 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 18 | 101 | 410 | 103 | 25 | 9 | 78% | 4.4 | 19.1% | 7.0% | 12.1% | 3.2% | 3.22 | 4.16 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 18 | 101 | 410 | 103 | 25 | 9 | 78% | 4.4 | 19.1% | 7.0% | 12.1% | 3.2% | 3.22 | 4.16 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 18 | 101 | 410 | 103 | 25 | 9 | 78% | 4.4 | 25.1% | 6.1% | 19.0% | 2.2% | 3.22 | 2.96 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 30 | 19 | 95 | 399 | 103 | 41 | 13 | 63% | 3.2 | 19.7% | 11.4% | 8.4% | 3.8% | 3.59 | 4.97 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 30 | 19 | 95 | 399 | 103 | 41 | 13 | 63% | 3.2 | 19.7% | 11.4% | 8.4% | 3.8% | 3.59 | 4.97 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 30 | 19 | 95 | 399 | 103 | 41 | 13 | 63% | 3.2 | 25.8% | 10.3% | 15.5% | 3.3% | 3.59 | 4.00 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | DET | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.9% | 9.8% | 9.2% | 3.1% | 4.83 | 4.83 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 12 | 12 | 75 | 315 | 61 | 30 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 19.2% | 9.6% | 9.6% | 3.2% | 4.80 | 4.81 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 11 | 11 | 67 | 283 | 55 | 27 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.3% | 9.6% | 9.7% | 3.2% | 4.82 | 4.85 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 50 | 25 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.2% | 9.8% | 9.4% | 3.4% | 4.89 | 4.95 | +0.3 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB MLE | DET | 10 | 10 | 61 | 257 | 54 | 24 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.9% | 9.2% | 11.7% | 3.6% | 4.86 | 4.84 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 31 | MLB MLE | DET | 9 | 9 | 54 | 227 | 47 | 22 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.5% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 3.8% | 4.97 | 5.04 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 4 | 4 | 27 | 114 | 22 | 11 | 3 | 100% | 6.8 | 19.2% | 9.6% | 9.6% | 3.0% | 4.73 | 4.74 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 7 | 7 | 40 | 169 | 33 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 5.7 | 19.3% | 9.6% | 9.7% | 3.1% | 4.74 | 4.77 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 7 | 7 | 43 | 182 | 35 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 6.1 | 19.2% | 9.8% | 9.4% | 3.2% | 4.81 | 4.87 | +0.2 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB CTX | DET | 8 | 8 | 47 | 198 | 42 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.9% | 9.2% | 11.7% | 3.4% | 4.78 | 4.76 | +0.3 |
| 2032 | 31 | MLB CTX | DET | 8 | 8 | 45 | 190 | 39 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 5.6 | 20.5% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 3.6% | 4.88 | 4.95 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 202 | 854 | 170 | 82 | 28 | 100% | 5.9 | 19.9% | 9.6% | 10.4% | 3.3% | 4.79 | 4.45 | +2.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 168 | 81 | 28 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.9% | 9.6% | 10.4% | 3.3% | 4.79 | 4.45 | +2.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 78 | 58 | 290 | 1254 | 244 | 131 | 38 | 74% | 3.7 | 19.5% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 3.0% | 3.91 | 4.44 | +1.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 54 | 40 | 200 | 864 | 168 | 90 | 26 | 74% | 3.7 | 19.5% | 10.5% | 9.0% | 3.0% | 3.91 | 4.44 | +1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 51 IPFIP 4.42 → 5.72 (+1.30)K% 27.0% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.01% | — | ×0.770 | 20.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.95% | — | ×1.150 | 11.45% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.27% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 5.33% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.42 → 5.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAErie SeaWolves · 35 IPFIP 3.24 → 3.88 (+0.64)K% 22.4% → 18.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.45% | — | ×0.810 | 18.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.20% | — | ×1.100 | 11.22% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.36% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 1.63% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.24 → 3.88, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 9 IPFIP 4.64 → 5.13 (+0.49)K% 31.7% → 27.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.71% | — | ×0.860 | 27.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.20% | — | ×0.900 | 10.98% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.88% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 5.37% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.64 → 5.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 69 IPFIP 3.45 → 4.77 (+1.32)K% 24.2% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.22% | — | ×0.770 | 18.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.92% | — | ×1.150 | 7.96% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.77% | ÷0.850 | ×1.250 | 4.07% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 70).
Result: FIP 3.45 → 4.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 31 IPFIP 1.77 → 2.70 (+0.92)K% 27.3% → 20.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.27% | — | ×0.740 | 20.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.13% | — | ×1.180 | 4.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.83% | ÷0.864 | ×1.300 | 1.24% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 73).
Result: FIP 1.77 → 2.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 93 IPFIP 3.06 → 4.04 (+0.98)K% 26.6% → 19.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.56% | — | ×0.740 | 19.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.39% | — | ×1.180 | 12.26% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.62% | ÷1.099 | ×1.300 | 1.91% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).
Result: FIP 3.06 → 4.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.9 | 65 | 19.6% | 9.6% | 1.30 | 4.86 |
| Josias Manzanillo ('04) | 1.7 | 57 | 20.0% | 10.2% | 1.21 | 4.71 |
| Luis Vizcaino ('09) | 2.7 | 68 | 21.0% | 10.1% | 1.30 | 4.33 |
| Bob Macdonald ('90-'96, 1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 59 | 18.3%* | 9.8%* | 1.20* | 4.32* |
| J. C. Gutierrez ('07-'14, -0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 57 | 19.8%* | 8.5%* | 1.19* | 4.72* |
| Bill Scherrer ('82-'88, 1 WAR*) | 1.6 | 62 | 20.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.19* | 4.44* |
| Jerry Don Gleaton ('79-'92, 2 WAR*) | 2.2 | 64 | 19.4%* | 10.2%* | 1.05* | 4.44* |