Angel Rivero
P FCL Blue Jays| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17 | ROKTOR | 11 | 10 | 35 | 4.93 | 1.69 | 25.0% | 5.9% | — | K 17.0% · BB 7.4% · FIP 2.60 |
| 2025 | 18 | ROKDSL Blue Jays… | 11 | 11 | 36 | 3.96 | 2.47 | 25.9% | 9.9% | — | K 17.6% · BB 12.3% · FIP 3.74 |
| 2026 | 19 | MIX2 levels | 15 | 12 | 55 | 3.62 | 4.33 | 25.4% | 11.9% | — | K 17.5% · BB 14.7% · FIP 5.89 |
| 2027PROJ | 20 | MLBLAA | — | — | 0 | 5.34 | 5.34 | 18.1% | 13.2% | — | |
| 2028PROJ35% MLB | 21 | MLBLAA | 3 | 3 | 15 | 5.13 | 5.04 | 19.5% | 11.8% | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ57% MLB | 22 | MLBLAA | 4 | 4 | 24 | 4.88 | 4.74 | 20.9% | 10.7% | 0.2 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Blue Jays | 11 | 10 | 35 | 152 | 38 | 9 | 0 | 91% | 3.2 | 17.0% | 7.4% | 9.6% | 0.0% | 4.93 | 2.60 | — |
| 2024 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Blue Jays | 11 | 10 | 35 | 152 | 38 | 9 | 0 | 91% | 3.2 | 17.0% | 7.4% | 9.6% | 0.0% | 4.93 | 2.60 | — |
| 2024 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Blue Jays | 11 | 10 | 35 | 152 | 38 | 9 | 0 | 91% | 3.2 | 25.0% | 5.9% | 19.1% | 0.0% | 4.93 | 1.69 | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Blue Jays Blue | 11 | 11 | 36 | 162 | 42 | 16 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 17.6% | 12.3% | 5.3% | 1.0% | 3.96 | 3.74 | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Blue Jays Blue | 11 | 11 | 36 | 162 | 42 | 16 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 17.6% | 12.3% | 5.3% | 1.0% | 3.96 | 3.74 | — |
| 2025 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Blue Jays Blue | 11 | 11 | 36 | 162 | 42 | 16 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 25.9% | 9.9% | 16.0% | 0.6% | 3.96 | 2.47 | — |
| 2026 | 19 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 15 | 12 | 55 | 244 | 62 | 29 | 8 | 80% | 3.6 | 17.5% | 14.7% | 2.8% | 4.4% | 3.62 | 5.89 | — |
| 2026 | 19 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 15 | 12 | 55 | 244 | 62 | 29 | 8 | 80% | 3.6 | 17.5% | 14.7% | 2.8% | 4.4% | 3.62 | 5.89 | — |
| 2026 | 19 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 15 | 12 | 55 | 244 | 62 | 29 | 8 | 80% | 3.6 | 25.4% | 11.9% | 13.5% | 3.3% | 3.62 | 4.33 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 20 | MLB | LAA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.1% | 13.2% | 5.0% | 3.1% | 5.34 | 5.34 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 21 | MLB MLE | LAA | 8 | 8 | 42 | 177 | 34 | 21 | 5 | 100% | 5.2 | 19.5% | 11.8% | 7.7% | 3.1% | 5.10 | 5.01 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 22 | MLB MLE | LAA | 8 | 8 | 42 | 177 | 37 | 19 | 5 | 100% | 5.2 | 20.9% | 10.7% | 10.2% | 3.0% | 4.85 | 4.71 | +0.3 |
| 2030 | 23 | MLB MLE | LAA | 8 | 8 | 42 | 179 | 39 | 18 | 5 | 100% | 5.3 | 21.7% | 9.9% | 11.9% | 3.0% | 4.65 | 4.52 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 24 | MLB MLE | LAA | 8 | 8 | 43 | 180 | 40 | 17 | 5 | 100% | 5.3 | 22.3% | 9.4% | 12.9% | 2.9% | 4.50 | 4.39 | +0.5 |
| 2032 | 25 | MLB MLE | LAA | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 40 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.7% | 9.1% | 13.6% | 2.9% | 4.39 | 4.32 | +0.5 |
| 2033 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAA | 7 | 7 | 42 | 179 | 41 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.9% | 9.1% | 13.8% | 2.9% | 4.33 | 4.30 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 27 | MLB MLE | LAA | 7 | 7 | 41 | 174 | 40 | 16 | 5 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.9% | 9.2% | 13.7% | 3.0% | 4.33 | 4.33 | +0.5 |
| 2028 | 21 | MLB CTX | LAA | 3 | 3 | 15 | 63 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 100% | 5.0 | 19.5% | 11.8% | 7.7% | 3.1% | 5.13 | 5.04 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 22 | MLB CTX | LAA | 4 | 4 | 24 | 101 | 21 | 11 | 3 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.9% | 10.7% | 10.2% | 3.1% | 4.88 | 4.74 | +0.2 |
| 2030 | 23 | MLB CTX | LAA | 5 | 5 | 30 | 127 | 28 | 13 | 4 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.7% | 9.9% | 11.9% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.55 | +0.3 |
| 2031 | 24 | MLB CTX | LAA | 6 | 6 | 34 | 144 | 32 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 5.7 | 22.3% | 9.4% | 12.9% | 3.0% | 4.53 | 4.42 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 25 | MLB CTX | LAA | 6 | 6 | 35 | 148 | 34 | 13 | 4 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.7% | 9.1% | 13.6% | 3.0% | 4.42 | 4.35 | +0.4 |
| 2033 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAA | 6 | 6 | 37 | 156 | 36 | 14 | 5 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.9% | 9.1% | 13.8% | 3.0% | 4.36 | 4.33 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 27 | MLB CTX | LAA | 6 | 6 | 37 | 156 | 36 | 14 | 5 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.9% | 9.2% | 13.7% | 3.0% | 4.36 | 4.36 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 38 | 38 | 211 | 893 | 198 | 86 | 27 | 100% | 5.6 | 22.1% | 9.6% | 12.5% | 3.0% | 4.56 | 4.10 | +3.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 36 | 36 | 200 | 844 | 187 | 81 | 26 | 100% | 5.6 | 22.1% | 9.6% | 12.5% | 3.0% | 4.56 | 4.10 | +3.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 37 | 33 | 126 | 558 | 97 | 67 | 12 | 89% | 3.4 | 17.4% | 12.0% | 5.4% | 2.2% | 4.08 | 4.37 | +3.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 59 | 53 | 200 | 888 | 155 | 107 | 20 | 89% | 3.4 | 17.4% | 12.0% | 5.4% | 2.2% | 4.08 | 4.37 | +2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Blue Jays · 42 IPFIP 3.19 → 4.74 (+1.54)K% 28.7% → 19.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.73% | — | ×0.680 | 19.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.71% | — | ×1.250 | 15.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.66% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 2.32% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.19 → 4.74, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 13 IPFIP 7.32 → 9.19 (+1.87)K% 15.9% → 11.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.87% | — | ×0.740 | 11.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.52% | — | ×1.180 | 11.24% |
| HR / BF /BF | 7.94% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 10.32% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 7.32 → 9.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKDSL Blue Jays Blue · 36 IPFIP 2.50 → 3.74 (+1.24)K% 25.9% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.93% | — | ×0.680 | 17.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.88% | — | ×1.250 | 12.35% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.62% | ÷0.836 | ×1.400 | 1.03% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 67).
Result: FIP 2.50 → 3.74, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKDSL Blue Jays · 35 IPFIP 1.74 → 2.60 (+0.86)K% 25.0% → 17.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.680 | 17.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.92% | — | ×1.250 | 7.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.892 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 1.74 → 2.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.6 | 41 | 21.5% | 10.2% | 1.15 | 4.67 |
| Scott Service ('04) | 2.1 | 46 | 22.2% | 9.9% | 1.23 | 5.04 |
| Jacob Barnes ('25) | 1.7 | 48 | 22.0% | 9.2% | 1.15 | 4.79 |
| Buck Farmer ('24) | 2.6 | 51 | 21.6% | 10.5% | 1.24 | 4.71 |
| Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 17.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.10* | 4.27* |
| Bill Pleis ('61-'66, -0 WAR*) | 1.4 | 56 | 19.7%* | 9.8%* | 1.15* | 4.53* |
| Bill Scherrer ('82-'88, 1 WAR*) | 1.6 | 62 | 20.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.19* | 4.44* |