Ulices Campos
P FCL Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 20 | MIX2 levels | 14 | 10 | 49 | 2.92 | 3.93 | 25.1% | 10.6% | — | K 17.9% · BB 11.5% · FIP 4.58 | |
| 2023 | 21 | ADET | 17 | 9 | 49 | 8.51 | 4.70 | 17.2% | 9.7% | — | K 12.7% · BB 11.4% · FIP 5.19 | |
| 2024 | 22 | ROKDET | 12 | 0 | 16 | 3.86 | 4.45 | 14.9% | 8.1% | — | K 10.1% · BB 10.1% · FIP 5.71 | |
| 2025 | 23 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBDET | — | — | 0 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 22.8% | 9.4% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 26 | MLBDET | 2 | 2 | 9 | 4.37 | 4.36 | 23.0% | 9.3% | 0.1 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers | 14 | 13 | 50 | 205 | 47 | 25 | 1 | 93% | 3.5 | 15.6% | 15.2% | 0.3% | 0.7% | 3.26 | 4.11 | — |
| 2021 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Tigers | 14 | 13 | 50 | 205 | 47 | 25 | 1 | 93% | 3.5 | 22.9% | 12.2% | 10.7% | 0.5% | 3.26 | 2.98 | — |
| 2022 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 14 | 10 | 49 | 199 | 50 | 21 | 6 | 71% | 3.5 | 17.9% | 11.5% | 6.4% | 2.8% | 2.92 | 4.58 | — |
| 2022 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 14 | 10 | 49 | 199 | 50 | 21 | 6 | 71% | 3.5 | 25.1% | 10.6% | 14.6% | 3.0% | 2.92 | 3.93 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 17 | 9 | 49 | 238 | 41 | 23 | 7 | 53% | 2.9 | 12.7% | 11.4% | 1.3% | 3.1% | 8.51 | 5.19 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 17 | 9 | 49 | 238 | 41 | 23 | 7 | 53% | 2.9 | 17.2% | 9.7% | 7.6% | 2.9% | 8.51 | 4.70 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | 12 | 0 | 16 | 74 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 10.1% | 10.1% | -0.0% | 4.0% | 3.86 | 5.71 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | 12 | 0 | 16 | 74 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 10.1% | 10.1% | -0.0% | 4.0% | 3.86 | 5.71 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | 12 | 0 | 16 | 74 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 14.9% | 8.1% | 6.8% | 2.7% | 3.86 | 4.45 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | DET | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.8% | 9.4% | 13.4% | 3.0% | 4.40 | 4.40 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 23.0% | 9.3% | 13.7% | 3.0% | 4.37 | 4.36 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 2 | 2 | 9 | 38 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 4.5 | 23.0% | 9.3% | 13.7% | 3.0% | 4.37 | 4.36 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 9 | 36 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 8.6 | 23.0% | 9.3% | 13.7% | 3.0% | 4.37 | 3.98 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 187 | 70 | 23 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.0% | 9.3% | 13.7% | 3.0% | 4.37 | 3.98 | +3.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 57 | 32 | 164 | 716 | 105 | 89 | 17 | 56% | 2.9 | 14.7% | 12.4% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 4.77 | 4.77 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 70 | 39 | 200 | 873 | 129 | 108 | 21 | 56% | 2.9 | 14.7% | 12.4% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 4.77 | 4.77 | +2.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ROKFCL Tigers · 16 IPFIP 4.36 → 5.71 (+1.36)K% 14.9% → 10.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.86% | — | ×0.680 | 10.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.11% | — | ×1.250 | 10.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.70% | ÷0.952 | ×1.400 | 3.98% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 4.36 → 5.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 49 IPFIP 4.48 → 5.19 (+0.71)K% 17.2% → 12.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.23% | — | ×0.740 | 12.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.66% | — | ×1.180 | 11.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.94% | ÷1.216 | ×1.300 | 3.14% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 143).
Result: FIP 4.48 → 5.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Tigers · 38 IPFIP 3.13 → 4.58 (+1.45)K% 26.3% → 17.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.32% | — | ×0.680 | 17.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.21% | — | ×1.250 | 11.51% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.97% | ÷0.990 | ×1.400 | 2.79% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 3.13 → 4.58, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 11 IPFIP 6.69 → 7.56 (+0.86)K% 21.3% → 15.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.28% | — | ×0.740 | 15.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.89% | — | ×1.180 | 17.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 6.38% | ÷1.279 | ×1.300 | 6.49% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 156).
Result: FIP 6.69 → 7.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL Tigers · 50 IPFIP 2.98 → 4.11 (+1.13)K% 22.9% → 15.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.93% | — | ×0.680 | 15.59% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.20% | — | ×1.250 | 15.24% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.49% | ÷0.956 | ×1.400 | 0.71% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 2.98 → 4.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).