Jharold Clemente
P FCL Rays| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | ROKTB | 14 | 11 | 54 | 4.14 | 3.04 | 23.1% | 5.3% | — | K 15.7% · BB 6.7% · FIP 4.09 |
| 2025 | 22 | ROKTB | 12 | 6 | 38 | 4.54 | 4.85 | 14.5% | 9.8% | — | K 9.8% · BB 12.3% · FIP 6.57 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBTB | — | — | 0 | 4.80 | 4.80 | 19.5% | 10.2% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 25 | MLBTB | 2 | 2 | 14 | 4.68 | 4.64 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | 8 | 7 | 24 | 101 | 26 | 11 | 2 | 88% | 3.0 | 17.5% | 13.6% | 3.9% | 3.0% | 3.04 | 4.97 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays | 8 | 7 | 24 | 101 | 26 | 11 | 2 | 88% | 3.0 | 25.7% | 10.9% | 14.9% | 2.0% | 3.04 | 3.40 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | 14 | 11 | 54 | 225 | 52 | 12 | 5 | 79% | 3.9 | 15.7% | 6.7% | 9.0% | 2.7% | 4.14 | 4.09 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK MLE | DSL Rays | 14 | 11 | 54 | 225 | 52 | 12 | 5 | 79% | 3.9 | 15.7% | 6.7% | 9.0% | 2.7% | 4.14 | 4.09 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | ROK RAW | DSL Rays | 14 | 11 | 54 | 225 | 52 | 12 | 5 | 79% | 3.9 | 23.1% | 5.3% | 17.8% | 2.2% | 4.14 | 3.04 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 12 | 6 | 38 | 173 | 25 | 17 | 5 | 50% | 3.1 | 9.8% | 12.3% | -2.5% | 5.0% | 4.54 | 6.57 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Rays | 12 | 6 | 38 | 173 | 25 | 17 | 5 | 50% | 3.1 | 9.8% | 12.3% | -2.5% | 5.0% | 4.54 | 6.57 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | ROK RAW | FCL Rays | 12 | 6 | 38 | 173 | 25 | 17 | 5 | 50% | 3.1 | 14.5% | 9.8% | 4.6% | 2.9% | 4.54 | 4.85 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | TB | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19.5% | 10.2% | 9.3% | 3.0% | 4.80 | 4.80 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | TB | 5 | 5 | 32 | 134 | 27 | 13 | 4 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 10.8% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.64 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | TB | 2 | 2 | 14 | 59 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 100% | 7.0 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 10.8% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.64 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 2 | 2 | 14 | 57 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 100% | 6.8 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 10.8% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.26 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 177 | 89 | 30 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 10.8% | 3.0% | 4.68 | 4.26 | +2.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 34 | 24 | 116 | 499 | 70 | 50 | 18 | 71% | 3.4 | 14.0% | 10.0% | 4.0% | 3.5% | 4.05 | 5.13 | +0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 59 | 41 | 200 | 863 | 121 | 86 | 31 | 71% | 3.4 | 14.0% | 10.0% | 4.0% | 3.5% | 4.05 | 5.13 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 ROKFCL Rays · 38 IPFIP 4.71 → 6.57 (+1.86)K% 14.5% → 9.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.45% | — | ×0.680 | 9.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.83% | — | ×1.250 | 12.28% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.89% | ÷0.809 | ×1.400 | 5.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 62).
Result: FIP 4.71 → 6.57, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKDSL Rays · 54 IPFIP 3.04 → 4.09 (+1.05)K% 23.1% → 15.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.11% | — | ×0.680 | 15.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.33% | — | ×1.250 | 6.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.22% | ÷1.160 | ×1.400 | 2.68% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 132).
Result: FIP 3.04 → 4.09, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Rays · 24 IPFIP 3.39 → 4.97 (+1.58)K% 25.7% → 17.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.74% | — | ×0.680 | 17.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.89% | — | ×1.250 | 13.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.98% | ÷0.938 | ×1.400 | 2.96% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 3.39 → 4.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.3 | 28 | 20.0% | 9.9% | 1.17 | 4.73 |
| Sam Long ('25) | 1.1 | 42 | 19.5% | 9.7% | 1.28 | 4.65 |
| Yency Almonte ('24) | 1.1 | 45 | 22.5% | 9.9% | 1.13 | 4.44 |
| Kevin Hickey ('81-'91, 0 WAR*) | 1.2 | 47 | 17.7%* | 10.2%* | 1.10* | 4.27* |
| Kevin Quackenbush ('21) | 1.0 | 52 | 21.0% | 9.2% | 1.04 | 4.41 |
| Bob Macdonald ('90-'96, 1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 59 | 18.3%* | 9.8%* | 1.20* | 4.32* |
| Bill Wilson ('69-'73, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 52 | 20.3%* | 11.5%* | 1.13* | 4.84* |