Cooper Chandler
P Aberdeen IronBirds| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 23 | ABAL | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11.25 | 2.35 | 15.0% | 5.0% | — | K 15.0% · BB 5.0% · FIP 2.47 | |
| 2023 | 24 | A+Aberdeen Iron… | 23 | 13 | 89 | 3.84 | 3.31 | 23.1% | 8.1% | — | K 17.8% · BB 9.3% · FIP 4.33 | |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX3 levels | 19 | 1 | 28 | 2.60 | 2.63 | 31.0% | 5.3% | — | K 23.5% · BB 6.4% · FIP 3.78 | |
| 2025 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBBAL | — | — | 0 | 4.25 | 4.25 | 23.4% | 8.6% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ30% MLB | 29 | MLBBAL | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.33 | 4.38 | 23.2% | 8.9% | 0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Delmarva Shorebirds | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.3 | 15.0% | 5.0% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 11.25 | 2.47 | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A RAW | Delmarva Shorebirds | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.3 | 15.0% | 5.0% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 11.25 | 2.35 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ MLE | Aberdeen IronBirds | 23 | 13 | 89 | 385 | 89 | 31 | 8 | 57% | 3.9 | 17.8% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 2.8% | 3.84 | 4.33 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | A+ RAW | Aberdeen IronBirds | 23 | 13 | 89 | 385 | 89 | 31 | 8 | 57% | 3.9 | 23.1% | 8.1% | 15.1% | 2.1% | 3.84 | 3.31 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 19 | 1 | 28 | 113 | 35 | 6 | 3 | 5% | 1.5 | 23.5% | 6.4% | 17.1% | 3.4% | 2.60 | 3.78 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 19 | 1 | 28 | 113 | 35 | 6 | 3 | 5% | 1.5 | 23.5% | 6.4% | 17.1% | 3.4% | 2.60 | 3.78 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 19 | 1 | 28 | 113 | 35 | 6 | 3 | 5% | 1.5 | 31.0% | 5.3% | 25.7% | 2.7% | 2.60 | 2.63 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | BAL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.4% | 8.6% | 14.8% | 3.0% | 4.25 | 4.25 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | BAL | 18 | 0 | 19 | 79 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.2% | 8.9% | 14.3% | 3.2% | 4.33 | 4.38 | +0.0 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | BAL | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.2% | 8.9% | 14.3% | 3.2% | 4.33 | 4.38 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 8.9% | 14.3% | 3.2% | 4.33 | 4.00 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 212 | 71 | 35 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.2% | 8.9% | 14.3% | 3.2% | 4.33 | 4.00 | +1.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 45 | 14 | 121 | 518 | 98 | 44 | 15 | 31% | 2.7 | 18.9% | 8.5% | 10.5% | 2.9% | 3.80 | 4.14 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 75 | 23 | 200 | 859 | 163 | 73 | 25 | 31% | 2.7 | 18.9% | 8.5% | 10.5% | 2.9% | 3.80 | 4.14 | +0.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 A+Aberdeen IronBirds · 18 IPFIP 2.75 → 3.78 (+1.03)K% 30.6% → 23.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.56% | — | ×0.770 | 23.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.56% | — | ×1.150 | 6.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.78% | ÷1.026 | ×1.250 | 3.39% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 2.75 → 3.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ADelmarva Shorebirds · 7 IPFIP 3.10 → 4.53 (+1.43)K% 28.6% → 21.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.57% | — | ×0.740 | 21.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.57% | — | ×1.180 | 4.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.57% | ÷0.952 | ×1.300 | 4.88% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 4.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Aberdeen IronBirds · 89 IPFIP 3.31 → 4.33 (+1.03)K% 23.1% → 17.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.12% | — | ×0.770 | 17.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.05% | — | ×1.150 | 9.26% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.08% | ÷0.912 | ×1.250 | 2.85% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.31 → 4.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ADelmarva Shorebirds · 4 IPFIP 2.47 → 2.91 (+0.44)K% 15.0% → 11.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.00% | — | ×0.740 | 11.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.00% | — | ×1.180 | 5.90% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.128 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 126).
Result: FIP 2.47 → 2.91, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).