Yovanny Cabrera
P South Bend Cubs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 34 | 0 | 72 | 3.73 | 3.53 | 25.6% | 13.5% | — | K 19.1% · BB 15.8% · FIP 4.63 | |
| 2024 | 23 | A+CHC | 33 | 0 | 45 | 3.97 | 4.36 | 23.7% | 14.5% | — | K 18.2% · BB 16.7% · FIP 5.49 | |
| 2025 | 24 | A+CHC | 7 | 0 | 11 | 5.91 | 3.85 | 16.0% | 16.0% | — | K 12.3% · BB 18.4% · FIP 4.39 | |
| 2026 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBCHC | — | — | 0 | 5.13 | 5.13 | 20.2% | 13.8% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 27 | MLBCHC | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5.07 | 5.09 | 20.5% | 13.4% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Cubs 2 | 19 | 5 | 42 | 180 | 48 | 31 | 1 | 26% | 2.2 | 18.1% | 21.5% | -3.4% | 0.8% | 4.32 | 4.72 | — |
| 2019 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Cubs 2 | 19 | 5 | 42 | 180 | 48 | 31 | 1 | 26% | 2.2 | 26.7% | 17.2% | 9.4% | 0.6% | 4.32 | 3.34 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | ROK MLE | ACL Cubs | 12 | 10 | 42 | 192 | 41 | 21 | 4 | 83% | 3.5 | 14.5% | 13.7% | 0.8% | 2.9% | 6.70 | 5.18 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | ROK RAW | ACL Cubs | 12 | 10 | 42 | 192 | 41 | 21 | 4 | 83% | 3.5 | 21.4% | 10.9% | 10.4% | 2.1% | 6.70 | 3.89 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 2 | 31 | 149 | 37 | 24 | 4 | 12% | 1.9 | 17.5% | 19.5% | -1.9% | 3.8% | 5.23 | 6.15 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 16 | 2 | 31 | 149 | 37 | 24 | 4 | 12% | 1.9 | 24.8% | 16.1% | 8.7% | 2.7% | 5.23 | 4.71 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 72 | 312 | 80 | 42 | 5 | 0% | 2.1 | 19.1% | 15.8% | 3.3% | 2.1% | 3.73 | 4.63 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 72 | 312 | 80 | 42 | 5 | 0% | 2.1 | 25.6% | 13.5% | 12.2% | 1.6% | 3.73 | 3.53 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | 33 | 0 | 45 | 207 | 49 | 30 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 18.2% | 16.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | 3.97 | 5.49 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | 33 | 0 | 45 | 207 | 49 | 30 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 18.2% | 16.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | 3.97 | 5.49 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A+ RAW | South Bend Cubs | 33 | 0 | 45 | 207 | 49 | 30 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 23.7% | 14.5% | 9.2% | 2.4% | 3.97 | 4.36 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | 7 | 0 | 11 | 50 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 12.3% | 18.4% | -6.1% | 0.0% | 5.91 | 4.39 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ MLE | South Bend Cubs | 7 | 0 | 11 | 50 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 12.3% | 18.4% | -6.1% | 0.0% | 5.91 | 4.39 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | A+ RAW | South Bend Cubs | 7 | 0 | 11 | 50 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 16.0% | 16.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.91 | 3.85 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | CHC | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.2% | 13.8% | 6.5% | 2.9% | 5.13 | 5.13 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | CHC | 15 | 0 | 16 | 66 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.5% | 13.4% | 7.1% | 3.0% | 5.07 | 5.09 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | CHC | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.5% | 13.4% | 7.1% | 3.0% | 5.07 | 5.09 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.5% | 13.4% | 7.1% | 3.0% | 5.07 | 4.71 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 175 | 105 | 35 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.5% | 13.4% | 7.1% | 3.0% | 5.07 | 4.71 | -0.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 121 | 17 | 243 | 1090 | 190 | 187 | 26 | 14% | 2.0 | 17.4% | 17.2% | 0.3% | 2.4% | 4.67 | 5.10 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 100 | 14 | 200 | 898 | 157 | 154 | 21 | 14% | 2.0 | 17.4% | 17.2% | 0.3% | 2.4% | 4.67 | 5.10 | -1.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 A+South Bend Cubs · 11 IPFIP 3.78 → 4.39 (+0.61)K% 16.0% → 12.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.00% | — | ×0.770 | 12.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.00% | — | ×1.150 | 18.40% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.106 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).
Result: FIP 3.78 → 4.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+South Bend Cubs · 45 IPFIP 4.26 → 5.49 (+1.23)K% 23.7% → 18.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.67% | — | ×0.770 | 18.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.49% | — | ×1.150 | 16.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.42% | ÷0.909 | ×1.250 | 3.32% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 4.26 → 5.49, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans · 61 IPFIP 3.36 → 4.56 (+1.20)K% 26.8% → 19.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.85% | — | ×0.740 | 19.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.23% | — | ×1.180 | 15.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.56% | ÷0.957 | ×1.300 | 2.11% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 3.36 → 4.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+South Bend Cubs · 11 IPFIP 4.25 → 4.96 (+0.71)K% 20.0% → 15.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.00% | — | ×0.770 | 15.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.55% | — | ×1.150 | 16.73% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.82% | ÷1.197 | ×1.250 | 1.90% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 139).
Result: FIP 4.25 → 4.96, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AMyrtle Beach Pelicans · 18 IPFIP 5.48 → 6.97 (+1.49)K% 18.4% → 13.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.39% | — | ×0.740 | 13.61% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.09% | — | ×1.180 | 18.99% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.45% | ÷0.942 | ×1.300 | 4.76% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 5.48 → 6.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKACL Cubs · 13 IPFIP 3.17 → 5.00 (+1.83)K% 33.9% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.87% | — | ×0.680 | 23.03% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.13% | — | ×1.250 | 20.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.61% | ÷0.963 | ×1.400 | 2.35% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 93).
Result: FIP 3.17 → 5.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKACL Cubs · 42 IPFIP 3.83 → 5.18 (+1.36)K% 21.4% → 14.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.35% | — | ×0.680 | 14.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.94% | — | ×1.250 | 13.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.08% | ÷1.014 | ×1.400 | 2.88% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 3.83 → 5.18, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKDSL Cubs 2 · 42 IPFIP 3.33 → 4.72 (+1.39)K% 26.7% → 18.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.67% | — | ×0.680 | 18.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.22% | — | ×1.250 | 21.53% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.56% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.78% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.33 → 4.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).