Talon Haley
P Rancho Cucamonga Quakes| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 20 | ALAA | 21 | 20 | 88 | 4.72 | 2.83 | 31.5% | 13.3% | — | K 23.3% · BB 15.7% · FIP 4.05 |
| 2027PROJ | 21 | MLBLAA | — | — | 0 | 4.99 | 4.99 | 24.1% | 16.0% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 22 | MLBLAA | 7 | 7 | 34 | 4.78 | 4.66 | 24.9% | 13.9% | 0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ73% MLB | 23 | MLBLAA | 10 | 10 | 51 | 4.55 | 4.42 | 25.4% | 12.5% | 0.6 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | 21 | 20 | 88 | 384 | 121 | 51 | 5 | 95% | 4.2 | 23.3% | 15.7% | 7.6% | 1.7% | 4.72 | 4.05 | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | 21 | 20 | 88 | 384 | 121 | 51 | 5 | 95% | 4.2 | 23.3% | 15.7% | 7.6% | 1.7% | 4.72 | 4.05 | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | 21 | 20 | 88 | 384 | 121 | 51 | 5 | 95% | 4.2 | 31.5% | 13.3% | 18.2% | 1.3% | 4.72 | 2.83 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB | LAA | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.1% | 16.0% | 8.1% | 2.8% | 4.99 | 4.99 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | LAA | 14 | 14 | 70 | 293 | 73 | 41 | 8 | 100% | 5.0 | 24.9% | 13.9% | 11.0% | 2.7% | 4.75 | 4.63 | +0.6 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB MLE | LAA | 13 | 13 | 70 | 293 | 75 | 37 | 8 | 100% | 5.3 | 25.4% | 12.5% | 13.0% | 2.7% | 4.52 | 4.39 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB MLE | LAA | 12 | 12 | 70 | 293 | 76 | 34 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 25.8% | 11.6% | 14.3% | 2.7% | 4.35 | 4.24 | +0.9 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB MLE | LAA | 11 | 11 | 66 | 280 | 73 | 31 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 26.1% | 11.0% | 15.1% | 2.7% | 4.22 | 4.14 | +1.0 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB MLE | LAA | 11 | 11 | 67 | 281 | 74 | 31 | 8 | 100% | 6.1 | 26.3% | 11.0% | 15.3% | 2.7% | 4.16 | 4.12 | +1.0 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB MLE | LAA | 11 | 11 | 65 | 274 | 72 | 30 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 26.3% | 11.1% | 15.3% | 2.7% | 4.16 | 4.16 | +1.0 |
| 2034 | 28 | MLB MLE | LAA | 10 | 10 | 62 | 262 | 69 | 29 | 7 | 100% | 6.2 | 26.2% | 11.2% | 15.0% | 2.8% | 4.21 | 4.24 | +0.8 |
| 2035 | 29 | MLB MLE | LAA | 10 | 10 | 58 | 243 | 63 | 28 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 26.0% | 11.4% | 14.5% | 3.0% | 4.31 | 4.37 | +0.7 |
| 2036 | 30 | MLB MLE | LAA | 10 | 10 | 57 | 242 | 67 | 26 | 8 | 100% | 5.7 | 27.6% | 10.9% | 16.7% | 3.2% | 4.29 | 4.28 | +0.8 |
| 2037 | 31 | MLB MLE | LAA | 8 | 8 | 51 | 214 | 58 | 24 | 7 | 100% | 6.3 | 27.2% | 11.3% | 15.9% | 3.4% | 4.41 | 4.48 | +0.5 |
| 2038 | 32 | MLB MLE | LAA | 7 | 7 | 44 | 185 | 50 | 22 | 7 | 100% | 6.3 | 26.8% | 11.7% | 15.1% | 3.7% | 4.59 | 4.71 | +0.4 |
| 2039 | 33 | MLB MLE | LAA | 6 | 6 | 38 | 160 | 42 | 19 | 6 | 100% | 6.3 | 26.3% | 12.1% | 14.1% | 3.9% | 4.81 | 4.96 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | LAA | 7 | 7 | 34 | 144 | 36 | 20 | 4 | 100% | 4.9 | 24.9% | 13.9% | 11.0% | 2.8% | 4.78 | 4.66 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 51 | 215 | 55 | 27 | 6 | 100% | 5.1 | 25.4% | 12.5% | 13.0% | 2.8% | 4.55 | 4.42 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 58 | 245 | 63 | 28 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 25.8% | 11.6% | 14.3% | 2.7% | 4.38 | 4.27 | +0.8 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 59 | 249 | 65 | 27 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 26.1% | 11.0% | 15.1% | 2.7% | 4.25 | 4.17 | +0.9 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 68 | 28 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 26.3% | 11.0% | 15.3% | 2.7% | 4.19 | 4.15 | +0.9 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 67 | 28 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 26.3% | 11.1% | 15.3% | 2.8% | 4.19 | 4.19 | +0.9 |
| 2034 | 28 | MLB CTX | LAA | 10 | 10 | 58 | 245 | 64 | 27 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 26.2% | 11.2% | 15.0% | 2.9% | 4.24 | 4.27 | +0.8 |
| 2035 | 29 | MLB CTX | LAA | 9 | 9 | 55 | 232 | 60 | 27 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 26.0% | 11.4% | 14.5% | 3.0% | 4.34 | 4.40 | +0.7 |
| 2036 | 30 | MLB CTX | LAA | 9 | 9 | 54 | 228 | 63 | 25 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 27.6% | 10.9% | 16.7% | 3.2% | 4.32 | 4.31 | +0.7 |
| 2037 | 31 | MLB CTX | LAA | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 55 | 23 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 27.2% | 11.3% | 15.9% | 3.5% | 4.45 | 4.52 | +0.5 |
| 2038 | 32 | MLB CTX | LAA | 7 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 47 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 26.8% | 11.7% | 15.1% | 3.7% | 4.63 | 4.75 | +0.3 |
| 2039 | 33 | MLB CTX | LAA | 6 | 6 | 36 | 152 | 40 | 18 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 26.3% | 12.1% | 14.1% | 4.0% | 4.85 | 5.00 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 105 | 105 | 615 | 2595 | 682 | 299 | 79 | 100% | 5.9 | 26.3% | 11.5% | 14.7% | 3.0% | 4.39 | 4.01 | +10.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 222 | 97 | 26 | 100% | 5.8 | 26.3% | 11.5% | 14.7% | 3.0% | 4.39 | 4.01 | +3.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 21 | 20 | 88 | 384 | 90 | 60 | 7 | 95% | 4.2 | 23.3% | 15.7% | 7.6% | 1.7% | 4.72 | 4.05 | +8.7 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 48 | 46 | 200 | 876 | 204 | 137 | 15 | 95% | 4.2 | 23.3% | 15.7% | 7.6% | 1.7% | 4.72 | 4.05 | +2.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ARancho Cucamonga Quakes · 88 IPFIP 2.84 → 4.05 (+1.21)K% 31.5% → 23.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.51% | — | ×0.740 | 23.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.28% | — | ×1.180 | 15.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.30% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 1.69% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.84 → 4.05, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.9 | 60 | 26.0% | 12.0% | 1.13 | 4.43 |
| Tim Stoddard ('75-'89, 4 WAR*) | 3.6 | 66 | 26.2%* | 11.2%* | 1.14* | 4.24* |
| Mike Remlinger ('06) | 4.4 | 68 | 22.4% | 11.3% | 1.05 | 3.90 |
| Rudy Seanez ('08) | 2.8 | 43 | 23.1% | 11.4% | 0.93 | 4.11 |
| Juan Cruz ('12) | 3.3 | 60 | 23.1% | 12.1% | 0.92 | 4.05 |
| Jeff Parrett ('86-'96, 6 WAR*) | 3.6 | 72 | 24.8%* | 11.0%* | 1.02* | 4.07* |
| Doug Bair ('76-'90, 7 WAR*) | 4.5 | 76 | 25.2%* | 10.4%* | 1.22* | 4.12* |