Jeremy Wu-Yelland
P Portland Sea Dogs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25 | A+BOS | 23 | 0 | 33 | 5.67 | 3.04 | 26.4% | 14.5% | — | K 20.3% · BB 16.6% · FIP 3.90 |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 0 | 46 | 3.15 | 2.11 | 37.6% | 7.9% | — | K 30.0% · BB 8.9% · FIP 2.93 |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 23 | 4 | 32 | 7.31 | 3.82 | 28.8% | 18.6% | — | K 22.0% · BB 20.4% · FIP 4.30 |
| 2027PROJ | 28 | MLBBOS | — | — | 0 | 4.73 | 4.73 | 24.4% | 14.8% | — | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 29 | MLBBOS | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4.77 | 4.82 | 24.1% | 14.5% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 76 | 329 | 90 | 42 | 5 | 100% | 3.3 | 19.6% | 14.6% | 5.0% | 2.1% | 3.91 | 4.44 | — |
| 2021 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 76 | 329 | 90 | 42 | 5 | 100% | 3.3 | 27.4% | 12.8% | 14.6% | 1.5% | 3.91 | 3.24 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | ROK MLE | FCL Red Sox | 3 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 67% | 1.3 | 10.5% | 26.3% | -15.8% | 5.3% | 9.00 | 8.43 | — |
| 2023 | 24 | ROK RAW | FCL Red Sox | 3 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 67% | 1.3 | 10.5% | 26.3% | -15.8% | 5.3% | 9.00 | 9.10 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | A+ MLE | Greenville Drive | 23 | 0 | 33 | 159 | 42 | 23 | 1 | 0% | 1.4 | 20.3% | 16.6% | 3.7% | 0.8% | 5.67 | 3.90 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | A+ MLE | Greenville Drive | 23 | 0 | 33 | 159 | 42 | 23 | 1 | 0% | 1.4 | 20.3% | 16.6% | 3.7% | 0.8% | 5.67 | 3.90 | — |
| 2024 | 25 | A+ RAW | Greenville Drive | 23 | 0 | 33 | 159 | 42 | 23 | 1 | 0% | 1.4 | 26.4% | 14.5% | 11.9% | 0.6% | 5.67 | 3.04 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 0 | 46 | 189 | 71 | 15 | 4 | 0% | 1.8 | 30.0% | 8.9% | 21.1% | 2.3% | 3.15 | 2.93 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 0 | 46 | 189 | 71 | 15 | 4 | 0% | 1.8 | 30.0% | 8.9% | 21.1% | 2.3% | 3.15 | 2.93 | — |
| 2025 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 0 | 46 | 189 | 71 | 15 | 4 | 0% | 1.8 | 37.6% | 7.9% | 29.6% | 2.1% | 3.15 | 2.11 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 4 | 32 | 156 | 45 | 29 | 2 | 17% | 1.4 | 22.0% | 20.4% | 1.6% | 0.9% | 7.31 | 4.30 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 4 | 32 | 156 | 45 | 29 | 2 | 17% | 1.4 | 22.0% | 20.4% | 1.6% | 0.9% | 7.31 | 4.30 | — |
| 2026 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 4 | 32 | 156 | 45 | 29 | 2 | 17% | 1.4 | 28.8% | 18.6% | 10.3% | 1.3% | 7.31 | 3.82 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 28 | MLB | BOS | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.4% | 14.8% | 9.6% | 2.6% | 4.73 | 4.73 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 29 | MLB MLE | BOS | 16 | 0 | 17 | 71 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.1% | 14.5% | 9.6% | 2.8% | 4.77 | 4.82 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 29 | MLB CTX | BOS | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.1% | 14.5% | 9.6% | 2.8% | 4.77 | 4.82 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.1% | 14.5% | 9.6% | 2.8% | 4.77 | 4.44 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 190 | 114 | 38 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.1% | 14.5% | 9.6% | 2.8% | 4.77 | 4.44 | +0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 97 | 29 | 191 | 852 | 190 | 128 | 15 | 30% | 2.0 | 22.3% | 15.1% | 7.2% | 1.7% | 4.71 | 4.07 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 102 | 30 | 200 | 892 | 199 | 134 | 15 | 30% | 2.0 | 22.3% | 15.1% | 7.2% | 1.7% | 4.71 | 4.07 | -0.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 29 IPFIP 3.55 → 4.30 (+0.75)K% 27.1% → 22.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.14% | — | ×0.810 | 21.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.57% | — | ×1.100 | 20.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.71% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 0.86% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.55 → 4.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 34 IPFIP 2.49 → 3.29 (+0.80)K% 37.0% → 29.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.96% | — | ×0.810 | 29.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.25% | — | ×1.100 | 7.97% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.90% | ÷1.119 | ×1.200 | 3.11% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 124).
Result: FIP 2.49 → 3.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Greenville Drive · 12 IPFIP 1.03 → 1.98 (+0.95)K% 39.2% → 30.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 39.22% | — | ×0.770 | 30.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.80% | — | ×1.150 | 11.27% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.117 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 123).
Result: FIP 1.03 → 1.98, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Greenville Drive · 33 IPFIP 3.05 → 3.90 (+0.86)K% 26.4% → 20.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.42% | — | ×0.770 | 20.34% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.47% | — | ×1.150 | 16.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.63% | ÷1.043 | ×1.250 | 0.75% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 3.05 → 3.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ASalem Red Sox · 67 IPFIP 3.19 → 4.44 (+1.26)K% 26.6% → 19.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.55% | — | ×0.740 | 19.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.41% | — | ×1.180 | 14.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.38% | ÷0.858 | ×1.300 | 2.09% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 72).
Result: FIP 3.19 → 4.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Greenville Drive · 9 IPFIP 3.64 → 5.15 (+1.51)K% 33.3% → 25.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.33% | — | ×0.770 | 25.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.38% | — | ×1.150 | 17.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.56% | ÷0.891 | ×1.250 | 3.60% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 3.64 → 5.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).