Jackson Cox
P Spokane Indians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 19 | ACOL | 10 | 9 | 31 | 7.26 | 3.81 | 21.5% | 13.4% | — | K 15.9% · BB 15.8% · FIP 4.57 |
| 2025 | 21 | ACOL | 23 | 23 | 85 | 3.39 | 3.65 | 27.0% | 7.3% | — | K 20.0% · BB 8.7% · FIP 5.40 |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 20 | 19 | 97 | 4.25 | 3.81 | 30.9% | 9.4% | — | K 24.3% · BB 10.6% · FIP 4.99 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBCOL | — | — | 0 | 4.76 | 4.76 | 23.8% | 10.2% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 24 | MLBCOL | 6 | 6 | 34 | 4.94 | 4.90 | 24.2% | 9.6% | 0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ66% MLB | 25 | MLBCOL | 8 | 8 | 49 | 4.84 | 4.80 | 24.4% | 9.3% | 0.5 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 19 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 10 | 9 | 31 | 149 | 32 | 20 | 2 | 90% | 3.1 | 15.9% | 15.8% | 0.1% | 1.5% | 7.26 | 4.57 | — |
| 2023 | 19 | A RAW | Fresno Grizzlies | 10 | 9 | 31 | 149 | 32 | 20 | 2 | 90% | 3.1 | 21.5% | 13.4% | 8.1% | 1.3% | 7.26 | 3.81 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 23 | 23 | 85 | 341 | 92 | 25 | 12 | 100% | 3.7 | 20.0% | 8.7% | 11.3% | 5.3% | 3.39 | 5.40 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 23 | 23 | 85 | 341 | 92 | 25 | 12 | 100% | 3.7 | 20.0% | 8.7% | 11.3% | 5.3% | 3.39 | 5.40 | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Fresno Grizzlies | 23 | 23 | 85 | 341 | 92 | 25 | 12 | 100% | 3.7 | 27.0% | 7.3% | 19.6% | 3.5% | 3.39 | 3.65 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 19 | 97 | 414 | 128 | 39 | 16 | 95% | 4.9 | 24.3% | 10.6% | 13.7% | 4.7% | 4.25 | 4.99 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 19 | 97 | 414 | 128 | 39 | 16 | 95% | 4.9 | 24.3% | 10.6% | 13.7% | 4.7% | 4.25 | 4.99 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 20 | 19 | 97 | 414 | 128 | 39 | 16 | 95% | 4.9 | 30.9% | 9.4% | 21.5% | 3.9% | 4.25 | 3.81 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | COL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.8% | 10.2% | 13.6% | 3.6% | 4.76 | 4.76 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | COL | 14 | 14 | 78 | 330 | 80 | 32 | 12 | 100% | 5.6 | 24.2% | 9.6% | 14.6% | 3.5% | 4.64 | 4.60 | +0.7 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | COL | 13 | 13 | 74 | 313 | 76 | 29 | 11 | 100% | 5.7 | 24.4% | 9.3% | 15.1% | 3.5% | 4.55 | 4.51 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | COL | 12 | 12 | 74 | 311 | 76 | 29 | 11 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.5% | 9.2% | 15.3% | 3.5% | 4.50 | 4.48 | +0.8 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | COL | 12 | 12 | 72 | 303 | 74 | 28 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.4% | 9.2% | 15.2% | 3.5% | 4.50 | 4.51 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | COL | 11 | 11 | 68 | 288 | 70 | 27 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.3% | 9.4% | 14.9% | 3.6% | 4.56 | 4.59 | +0.6 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | COL | 11 | 11 | 64 | 268 | 65 | 26 | 10 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.1% | 9.6% | 14.5% | 3.8% | 4.66 | 4.73 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | COL | 11 | 11 | 63 | 268 | 69 | 24 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 25.7% | 9.1% | 16.6% | 4.0% | 4.64 | 4.63 | +0.6 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB MLE | COL | 9 | 9 | 56 | 237 | 60 | 22 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 25.3% | 9.5% | 15.8% | 4.2% | 4.76 | 4.83 | +0.4 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | COL | 6 | 6 | 34 | 144 | 35 | 14 | 6 | 100% | 5.7 | 24.2% | 9.6% | 14.6% | 4.1% | 4.94 | 4.90 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | COL | 8 | 8 | 49 | 207 | 51 | 19 | 8 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.4% | 9.3% | 15.1% | 4.0% | 4.84 | 4.80 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | COL | 10 | 10 | 58 | 245 | 60 | 23 | 10 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.5% | 9.2% | 15.3% | 4.0% | 4.79 | 4.77 | +0.6 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | COL | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 63 | 24 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.4% | 9.2% | 15.2% | 4.0% | 4.79 | 4.80 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | COL | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 63 | 24 | 11 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.3% | 9.4% | 14.9% | 4.2% | 4.86 | 4.89 | +0.6 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | COL | 10 | 10 | 58 | 245 | 59 | 24 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.1% | 9.6% | 14.5% | 4.3% | 4.97 | 5.04 | +0.4 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | COL | 10 | 10 | 58 | 245 | 63 | 22 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 25.7% | 9.1% | 16.6% | 4.6% | 4.97 | 4.96 | +0.5 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB CTX | COL | 9 | 9 | 52 | 220 | 56 | 21 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 25.3% | 9.5% | 15.8% | 4.8% | 5.11 | 5.18 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 73 | 73 | 432 | 1822 | 449 | 170 | 77 | 100% | 5.9 | 24.6% | 9.4% | 15.3% | 4.3% | 4.91 | 4.54 | +4.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 208 | 79 | 36 | 100% | 5.9 | 24.6% | 9.4% | 15.3% | 4.3% | 4.91 | 4.54 | +2.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 53 | 51 | 213 | 904 | 192 | 97 | 40 | 96% | 4.0 | 21.3% | 10.7% | 10.6% | 4.4% | 4.35 | 5.08 | +5.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 50 | 48 | 200 | 848 | 180 | 91 | 37 | 96% | 4.0 | 21.3% | 10.7% | 10.6% | 4.4% | 4.35 | 5.08 | +1.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Spokane Indians · 55 IPFIP 3.31 → 4.60 (+1.29)K% 32.8% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.77% | — | ×0.770 | 25.24% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.14% | — | ×1.150 | 8.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.78% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 4.73% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.31 → 4.60, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAHartford Yard Goats · 42 IPFIP 4.47 → 5.52 (+1.05)K% 28.4% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.41% | — | ×0.810 | 23.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.50% | — | ×1.100 | 13.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.98% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 4.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.47 → 5.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AFresno Grizzlies · 85 IPFIP 3.68 → 5.40 (+1.72)K% 27.0% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.98% | — | ×0.740 | 19.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.33% | — | ×1.180 | 8.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.52% | ÷0.870 | ×1.300 | 5.26% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 74).
Result: FIP 3.68 → 5.40, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AFresno Grizzlies · 31 IPFIP 3.72 → 4.57 (+0.85)K% 21.5% → 15.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.48% | — | ×0.740 | 15.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.42% | — | ×1.180 | 15.84% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.34% | ÷1.186 | ×1.300 | 1.47% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 137).
Result: FIP 3.72 → 4.57, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.1 | 69 | 24.5% | 9.5% | 1.42 | 4.61 |
| Robert Stephenson ('25) | 1.9 | 62 | 25.9% | 10.1% | 1.54 | 4.59 |
| David Hernandez ('19) | 3.2 | 65 | 23.9% | 9.1% | 1.22 | 4.12 |
| Noé Ramirez ('22) | 1.5 | 59 | 24.8% | 9.4% | 1.42 | 4.21 |
| Xavier Hernandez ('89-'98, 3 WAR*) | 3.4 | 67 | 23.9%* | 9.1%* | 1.12* | 4.20* |
| Jeff Brantley ('88-'01, 9 WAR*) | 4.3 | 72 | 24.3%* | 10.0%* | 1.43* | 3.73* |
| Rob Murphy ('85-'95, 6 WAR*) | 3.1 | 69 | 25.2%* | 9.2%* | 1.07* | 3.94* |