Angel Jimenez

P Fresno Grizzlies

Age 24 RHP 6'2" / 190 lbs A Svc 0.0 · Ctrl thru 2034 peak 0.8 · 2030

Overview

APROSPECTMiLBFA 2035

OGV OFP35OGV rank#636ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2023	20	ROKCOL	10	9	38	3.08	1.97	34.2%	4.1%	—	K 23.3% · BB 5.1% · FIP 3.31
2025	22	MIX2 levels	17	17	61	4.01	2.36	28.0%	9.6%	—	K 20.1% · BB 11.4% · FIP 3.48
2026	23	MIX3 levels	23	22	89	5.58	3.62	29.8%	9.1%	—	K 21.9% · BB 10.9% · FIP 5.12
2027PROJ	24	MLBCOL	—	—	0	4.89	4.89	22.0%	11.3%	—
2028PROJ43% MLB	25	MLBCOL	5	5	29	5.04	5.00	22.5%	10.7%	0.2
2029PROJ66% MLB	26	MLBCOL	7	7	43	4.97	4.94	22.6%	10.4%	0.4

Next 3 projected WAR 0.6Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

ContractESTIMATED

Control thru2034Service0.0First FA2035

2027MiLB2028MiLB2029Pre-Arb$0.8M2030Pre-Arb$0.8M2031Pre-Arb$0.9M2032Arb-1$1M2033Arb-2$1M2034Arb-3$7M

Career WAR0.0 WAR median (P10 -0.2 / P90 2.8, comp-based) · star 2% · didn't stick 90%

CompsRyan Garcia (age 24) · Will Sanders (age 22) · Cameron Foster (age 24)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 126118vR 110

ERA4.89

FIP4.89

K%22.0%

BB%11.3%

K-BB%10.6%

Proj IP67

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 67 IP

━ projected WAR━ paid WAR ($/8M) surplus deficit+$8M ctrl surplus

Contract

Contract ESTIMATED · service-time + WAR-based estimator (needs verification)

Status MiLB

MLB Debut 2029

Service 0 yrs (est)

Team Control Through 2034

First FA Year 2035

Year	Status	Salary	Proj WAR	Value	Surplus
2027	MiLB	still in minors · estimated debut 2029
2028	MiLB	still in minors · estimated debut 2029
2029	Pre-Arb	$0.8M	+0.4	$1M	+$0.7M
2030	Pre-Arb	$0.8M	+0.6	$2M	+$1M
2031	Pre-Arb	$0.9M	+0.6	$2M	+$1M
2032	Arb-1	$1M	+0.5	$1M	+$0.8M
2033	Arb-2	$1M	+0.3	$0.8M	+$0.0M
2034	Arb-3	$7M	—	—	—
Totals		$5M		$7M	+$4M

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2022	19	ROK MLE	DSL Colorado	11	6	41	158	47	7	3	55%	3.7	20.2%	5.5%	14.7%	2.1%	3.32	3.24	—
2022	19	ROK RAW	DSL Colorado	11	6	41	158	47	7	3	55%	3.7	29.7%	4.4%	25.3%	1.9%	3.32	2.26	—
2023	20	ROK MLE	ACL Rockies	10	9	38	146	50	6	3	90%	3.8	23.3%	5.1%	18.2%	2.8%	3.08	3.31	—
2023	20	ROK RAW	ACL Rockies	10	9	38	146	50	6	3	90%	3.8	34.2%	4.1%	30.1%	2.1%	3.08	1.97	—
2025	22	MIX MLE	2 levels	17	17	61	261	73	25	2	100%	3.6	20.1%	11.4%	8.7%	1.1%	4.01	3.48	—
2025	22	MIX MLE	2 levels	17	17	61	261	73	25	2	100%	3.6	20.1%	11.4%	8.7%	1.1%	4.01	3.48	—
2025	22	MIX RAW	2 levels	17	17	61	261	73	25	2	100%	3.6	28.0%	9.6%	18.4%	0.8%	4.01	2.36	—
2026	23	MIX MLE	3 levels	23	22	89	383	114	35	13	96%	3.9	21.9%	10.9%	11.0%	4.5%	5.58	5.12	—
2026	23	MIX MLE	3 levels	23	22	89	383	114	35	13	96%	3.9	21.9%	10.9%	11.0%	4.5%	5.58	5.12	—
2026	23	MIX RAW	3 levels	23	22	89	383	114	35	13	96%	3.9	29.8%	9.1%	20.6%	3.4%	5.58	3.62	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	24	MLB	COL	—	—	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	22.0%	11.3%	10.6%	3.3%	4.89	4.89	—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	25	MLB MLE	COL	12	12	68	288	65	31	9	100%	5.7	22.5%	10.7%	11.8%	3.3%	4.77	4.73	+0.5
2029	26	MLB MLE	COL	11	11	65	273	62	28	9	100%	5.9	22.6%	10.4%	12.2%	3.3%	4.70	4.67	+0.5
2030	27	MLB MLE	COL	11	11	68	288	71	27	9	100%	6.2	24.6%	9.5%	15.1%	3.3%	4.52	4.42	+0.8
2031	28	MLB MLE	COL	11	11	65	274	67	26	9	100%	5.9	24.4%	9.7%	14.8%	3.4%	4.51	4.50	+0.7
2032	29	MLB MLE	COL	10	10	60	254	61	25	9	100%	6.0	24.2%	9.9%	14.3%	3.5%	4.58	4.63	+0.5
2033	30	MLB MLE	COL	9	9	54	229	55	23	9	100%	6.0	23.8%	10.2%	13.7%	3.7%	4.72	4.81	+0.4
2028	25	MLB CTX	COL	5	5	29	122	28	13	5	100%	5.8	22.5%	10.7%	11.8%	3.8%	5.04	5.00	+0.2
2029	26	MLB CTX	COL	7	7	43	182	41	19	7	100%	6.1	22.6%	10.4%	12.2%	3.8%	4.97	4.94	+0.4
2030	27	MLB CTX	COL	9	9	53	224	55	21	8	100%	5.9	24.6%	9.5%	15.1%	3.8%	4.80	4.70	+0.6
2031	28	MLB CTX	COL	9	9	54	228	56	22	9	100%	6.0	24.4%	9.7%	14.8%	3.9%	4.79	4.78	+0.6
2032	29	MLB CTX	COL	9	9	53	224	54	22	9	100%	5.9	24.2%	9.9%	14.3%	4.1%	4.88	4.93	+0.5
2033	30	MLB CTX	COL	8	8	49	207	49	21	9	100%	6.1	23.8%	10.2%	13.7%	4.3%	5.03	5.12	+0.3
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		47	47	280	1184	282	118	47	100%	6.0	23.8%	10.0%	13.8%	3.9%	4.90	4.52	+2.9
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		33	33	200	844	201	84	34	100%	6.0	23.8%	10.0%	13.8%	3.9%	4.90	4.52	+2.0
Career	—	MLE		61	54	228	948	202	88	28	89%	3.7	21.4%	9.3%	12.1%	2.9%	4.34	4.08	+3.4
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		54	47	200	832	178	77	24	89%	3.7	21.4%	9.3%	12.1%	2.9%	4.34	4.08	+1.8

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2026 AFresno Grizzlies · 62 IPFIP 2.51 → 3.71 (+1.20)K% 31.8% → 23.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	31.82%	—	×0.740	23.55%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	8.33%	—	×1.180	9.83%
HR / BF /BF	1.89%	÷1.000	×1.300	2.46%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 2.51 → 3.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2026 A+Spokane Indians · 21 IPFIP 7.07 → 8.84 (+1.77)K% 23.0% → 17.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	23.00%	—	×0.770	17.71%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	12.00%	—	×1.150	13.80%
HR / BF /BF	8.00%	÷1.000	×1.250	10.00%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 7.07 → 8.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 AFresno Grizzlies · 38 IPFIP 2.98 → 4.17 (+1.19)K% 27.2% → 20.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	27.17%	—	×0.740	20.10%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	12.14%	—	×1.180	14.32%
HR / BF /BF	1.16%	÷0.870	×1.300	1.73%

Result: FIP 2.98 → 4.17, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ROKACL Rockies · 22 IPFIP 1.18 → 2.12 (+0.94)K% 29.5% → 20.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	29.55%	—	×0.680	20.09%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	4.55%	—	×1.250	5.68%
HR / BF /BF	0.00%	÷0.970	×1.400	0.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).

Result: FIP 1.18 → 2.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ROKACL Rockies · 38 IPFIP 1.86 → 3.31 (+1.46)K% 34.2% → 23.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	34.25%	—	×0.680	23.29%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	4.11%	—	×1.250	5.14%
HR / BF /BF	2.05%	÷1.031	×1.400	2.79%

Result: FIP 1.86 → 3.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 ROKDSL Colorado · 41 IPFIP 2.19 → 3.24 (+1.05)K% 29.7% → 20.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	= MLE
K% /BF	29.75%	—	×0.680	20.23%
BB% (unintentional) /BF	4.43%	—	×1.250	5.54%
HR / BF /BF	1.90%	÷1.271	×1.400	2.09%

Result: FIP 2.19 → 3.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Angel Jimenez (OGILVIE)	—	—	—	—	—	3.3%	—	4.61	23.3%	13.1%	201	-0.28	—	—	—
Ryan Garcia R 2022 · 3.74 FIP	24	SP	3.74	23.2%	10.7%	2.3%	.239	5.53	19.8%	6.6%	278	+1.79	3.74	362	85
Will Sanders R 2024 · 4.95 FIP	22	SP	4.95	19.3%	11.8%	3.6%	.297	4.11	20.1%	12.5%	173	-0.84	3.92	266	84
Cameron Foster R 2023 · 4.31 FIP	24	SP	4.31	18.9%	10.3%	2.7%	.329	4.03	21.1%	11.2%	132	-0.28	2.50	213	83
Trent Palmer R 2022 · 4.79 FIP	23	SP	4.79	22.0%	10.4%	4.1%	.284	4.83	12.8%	-9.4%	22	+0.04	3.51	140	83
Josh Bostick R 2024 · 4.65 FIP	22	SP	4.65	19.3%	11.2%	3.2%	.304	5.40	21.7%	12.6%	119	+0.75	4.65	226	82
Connor Staine R 2024 · 4.80 FIP	23	SP	4.80	20.3%	12.6%	3.3%	.266	5.19	16.1%	3.4%	230	+0.39	3.86	414	82
Rorik Maltrud R 2024 · 3.91 FIP	24	SP-	3.91	20.4%	9.6%	2.4%	.300	4.40	18.6%	9.4%	193	+0.49	3.91	298	81
Tim Redding R 2002 · 4.40 FIP	24	SP-	4.40	19.4%	9.8%	3.1%	.309	4.48	13.8%	5.4%	307	+0.08	3.97	822	80
Cade Smith R 2024 · 3.86 FIP	22	SP	3.86	23.2%	13.3%	1.9%	.273	5.35	18.2%	6.6%	157	+1.49	3.86	243	80
Hayden Minton R 2024 · 4.04 FIP	23	SP	4.04	19.7%	12.3%	1.9%	.357	4.53	19.4%	10.3%	187	+0.49	4.04	280	80
Tyler Uberstine R 2022 · 4.19 FIP	23	SP-	4.19	19.5%	10.5%	2.6%	.302	4.27	22.8%	15.4%	121	+0.08	2.98	262	80
Ricky Castro R 2024 · 3.99 FIP	24	SP-	3.99	20.4%	8.6%	2.8%	.287	5.11	19.0%	10.6%	178	+1.12	3.99	241	80
Derek True R 2024 · 4.90 FIP	23	SP-	4.90	18.5%	10.5%	3.7%	.333	4.95	17.6%	5.9%	73	+0.05	4.50	170	80
Levi Wells R 2024 · 4.35 FIP	22	SP	4.35	20.0%	12.1%	2.6%	.360	3.82	19.0%	10.2%	132	-0.53	3.70	192	80
Tanner Hall R 2024 · 4.67 FIP	22	SP-	4.67	18.8%	11.2%	3.2%	.295	5.33	10.1%	-4.6%	72	+0.66	4.67	137	80
Angel Guzman R 2006 · 4.73 FIP	24	SP-	4.73	22.1%	13.2%	3.3%	.353	3.88	19.6%	12.0%	91	-0.85	3.13	147	80
Wil Jensen R 2022 · 4.69 FIP	24	SP-	4.69	20.2%	8.6%	4.0%	.261	4.20	21.4%	11.1%	173	-0.49	3.48	368	80
Luke Russo R 2024 · 3.74 FIP	23	SP	3.74	21.7%	11.1%	1.9%	.326	5.00	19.6%	8.8%	159	+1.26	3.74	260	80
Rafael Montero R 2014 · 5.04 FIP	23	SP-	5.04	21.6%	11.9%	4.1%	.298	4.32	19.3%	8.2%	296	-0.72	2.43	714	80
Kenten Egbert R 2024 · 4.26 FIP	23	SP-	4.26	19.6%	9.6%	2.9%	.257	4.34	10.8%	3.5%	133	+0.08	4.04	231	79

Career Comps

Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.

Player	162s	IP/yr	K%	BB%	HR/9	ERA
OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION	2.2	64	23.4%	10.3%	1.31	4.67
José Ruiz ('25)	1.4	57	22.3%	10.4%	1.44	4.62
Luis Vizcaino ('09)	2.7	68	21.0%	10.1%	1.30	4.33
Jorge Julio ('09)	2.3	58	21.7%	11.3%	1.25	4.43
Bill Scherrer ('82-'88, 1 WAR*)	1.6	62	20.7%*	10.2%*	1.19*	4.44*
Bill Pleis ('61-'66, -0 WAR*)	1.4	56	19.7%*	9.8%*	1.15*	4.53*
Xavier Hernandez ('89-'98, 3 WAR*)	3.4	67	23.9%*	9.1%*	1.12*	4.20*