Daniel Garcia

P DSL Brewers Gold

Age 19 LHP 6'0" / 170 lbs ROK peak 0.1 · 2028

Overview

ROKPROSPECT

ETA2028MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2025	17	ROKDSL Brewers G…	7	5	18	3.00	2.99	17.1%	10.5%	—	K 11.6% · BB 13.2% · FIP 3.78
2026	18	ROKDSL Brewers G…	7	7	18	3.50	4.60	14.3%	15.6%	—	K 9.7% · BB 19.5% · FIP 5.75
2027PROJ	19	MLB—	2	2	11	5.37	5.37	19.3%	15.0%	-0.1
2028PROJ49% MLB	20	MLB—	2	2	10	5.11	5.01	20.3%	13.2%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career WAR0 WAR median (P10 0 / P90 0, comp-based) · star 0% · didn't stick 99%

CompsJagger Haynes (age 20) · Luke Fox (age 22) · Ethan Lindow (age 18)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 119127vR 135

ERA5.37

FIP5.37

K%19.3%

BB%15.0%

K-BB%4.3%

Proj IP11

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 11 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†4550

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2025	17	ROK MLE	DSL Brewers Gold	7	5	18	76	13	8	0	71%	2.6	11.6%	13.2%	-1.5%	0.0%	3.00	3.78	—
2025	17	ROK MLE	DSL Brewers Gold	7	5	18	76	13	8	0	71%	2.6	11.6%	13.2%	-1.5%	0.0%	3.00	3.78	—
2025	17	ROK RAW	DSL Brewers Gold	7	5	18	76	13	8	0	71%	2.6	17.1%	10.5%	6.6%	0.0%	3.00	2.99	—
2026	18	ROK MLE	DSL Brewers Gold	7	7	18	77	11	12	1	100%	2.6	9.7%	19.5%	-9.8%	1.8%	3.50	5.75	—
2026	18	ROK MLE	DSL Brewers Gold	7	7	18	77	11	12	1	100%	2.6	9.7%	19.5%	-9.8%	1.8%	3.50	5.75	—
2026	18	ROK RAW	DSL Brewers Gold	7	7	18	77	11	12	1	100%	2.6	14.3%	15.6%	-1.3%	1.3%	3.50	4.60	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	19	MLB	—	2	2	11	46	9	7	1	100%	5.5	19.3%	15.0%	4.3%	2.9%	5.37	5.37	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	20	MLB MLE	—	4	4	20	84	17	11	2	100%	5.0	20.3%	13.2%	7.2%	2.9%	5.11	5.01	-0.0
2028	20	MLB CTX	—	2	2	10	42	9	6	1	100%	5.0	20.3%	13.2%	7.2%	2.9%	5.11	5.01	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		2	2	10	42	8	5	1	100%	4.9	20.3%	13.2%	7.2%	2.9%	5.11	4.63	+0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		43	43	200	844	163	102	20	100%	4.6	20.3%	13.2%	7.2%	2.9%	5.11	4.63	+0.6
Career	—	MLE		14	12	36	153	16	25	1	86%	2.6	10.7%	16.3%	-5.7%	0.9%	3.25	4.77	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		78	67	200	850	91	139	8	86%	2.6	10.7%	16.3%	-5.7%	0.9%	3.25	4.77	-0.3

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Daniel Garcia (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.37	19.3%	15.0%	2.9%	—	5.01	20.3%	7.2%	20	-0.36	—	—	—
Jagger Haynes L 2023 · 4.25 FIP	20	SP	4.25	19.7%	13.0%	2.1%	.303	4.98	17.7%	3.9%	349	+0.73	4.25	374	86
Luke Fox L 2024 · 5.24 FIP	22	SP	5.24	21.8%	19.2%	2.8%	.284	4.16	21.4%	8.1%	125	-1.08	3.60	156	80
Ethan Lindow L 2017 · 4.33 FIP	18	SP	4.33	19.1%	12.4%	2.3%	.329	2.95	19.8%	14.0%	111	-1.38	2.95	435	80
Joe Miller L 2022 · 4.48 FIP	22	SP	4.48	17.4%	13.9%	2.0%	.375	4.22	16.0%	7.7%	273	-0.26	3.76	355	79
Jordan Woods L 2024 · 4.51 FIP	20	SP	4.51	20.5%	10.3%	3.3%	.329	4.18	20.5%	8.3%	139	-0.33	3.92	170	78
Reinold Navarro L 2024 · 4.92 FIP	17	SP	4.92	21.7%	22.6%	1.4%	.211	4.32	29.4%	5.7%	95	-0.60	3.55	119	77
Deyer Zapata L 2022 · 4.25 FIP	18	SP	4.25	18.8%	14.3%	1.7%	.309	5.18	17.5%	4.0%	50	+0.93	3.77	130	77
Liam Sullivan L 2023 · 5.78 FIP	21	SP	5.78	25.7%	20.5%	4.1%	.290	5.79	20.9%	7.2%	141	+0.01	4.45	156	77
Mavis Graves L 2023 · 6.17 FIP	19	SP	6.17	18.8%	22.2%	3.3%	.365	4.16	23.9%	10.0%	243	-2.01	3.10	277	76
Nate Savino L 2024 · 5.85 FIP	22	SP	5.85	16.8%	18.8%	3.2%	.244	4.83	14.9%	2.0%	130	-1.02	4.26	176	76
Dylan MacLean L 2021 · 6.38 FIP	19	SP	6.38	13.6%	27.9%	1.6%	.271	4.11	15.7%	5.3%	101	-2.27	3.45	282	75
Hector Yan L 2018 · 5.96 FIP	19	SP	5.96	14.8%	18.8%	3.2%	.321	4.90	21.8%	6.6%	191	-1.06	3.48	268	75
Jackson Humphries L 2023 · 4.48 FIP	19	SP	4.48	19.8%	14.0%	2.3%	.302	5.94	20.8%	1.5%	248	+1.46	4.48	305	74
Jacob Bresnahan L 2024 · 4.95 FIP	19	SP	4.95	20.2%	14.1%	3.2%	.292	3.92	23.2%	11.1%	208	-1.03	3.03	277	73
Jeremy Wu-Yelland L 2021 · 4.44 FIP	22	SP	4.44	19.6%	14.6%	2.1%	.266	3.90	20.3%	3.7%	33	-0.54	2.93	175	73
Armando Vasquez L 2022 · 4.22 FIP	21	SP-	4.22	14.7%	14.7%	0.9%	.318	5.52	21.2%	3.2%	94	+1.30	4.22	131	73
Braeden Ogle L 2016 · 5.04 FIP	19	SP	5.04	12.4%	12.5%	2.5%	.208	4.59	16.7%	5.4%	92	-0.45	3.80	239	72
Adam Shoemaker L 2022 · 4.46 FIP	19	SP-	4.46	13.9%	16.2%	0.9%	.320	5.32	17.9%	-2.3%	169	+0.86	4.41	246	72
Brandon Herbold L 2024 · 6.27 FIP	19	SP-	6.27	17.2%	17.6%	4.3%	.296	5.06	19.8%	-3.9%	44	-1.21	3.72	105	72
Nicolas Carreno L 2024 · 4.48 FIP	18	SP	4.48	21.3%	20.8%	1.0%	.243	4.64	20.6%	3.1%	122	+0.16	4.48	166	72