Deyer Zapata

P Visalia Rawhide
Age 23 LHP 6'0" / 150 lbs A
Overview
APROSPECT
ETA2028MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202420ROKARI150353.893.8826.5%12.3%—K 18.0% · BB 15.3% · FIP 5.79
202521AARI60151.203.1021.9%7.8%—K 16.2% · BB 9.2% · FIP 3.77
2027PROJ23MLBARI——04.654.6521.6%10.7%—
2028PROJ43% MLB24MLBARI7074.534.4822.4%10.0%0.0
Next 2 projected WAR 0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsFelix Doubront (age 22) · Brad Mills (age 25) · Lucas Knowles (age 23)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 105113vR 122
ERA4.65
FIP4.65
K%21.6%
BB%10.7%
K-BB%10.9%
Proj IP12
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 12 IP
K: -0.0 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-0KBB: -0.3 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-0BBCONTACT: -0.3 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-0CONTACTSTAM: +0.5 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+0STAMTotal WAR: -0.01 (12 IP)-0.0WAR
0.00.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†5055

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202117ROK MLEDSL D-backs 1166361523514138%2.315.7%11.5%4.1%1.0%3.223.78—
202117ROK RAWDSL D-backs 1166361523514138%2.323.0%9.2%13.8%0.7%3.222.69—
202218ROK MLEDSL D-backs Black1210441845121283%3.718.8%14.3%4.6%1.7%2.444.25—
202218ROK RAWDSL D-backs Black1210441845121283%3.727.7%11.4%16.3%1.1%2.442.81—
202420ROK MLEACL D-backs15035155411940%2.318.0%15.3%2.7%4.1%3.895.79—
202420ROK MLEACL D-backs15035155411940%2.318.0%15.3%2.7%4.1%3.895.79—
202420ROK RAWACL D-backs15035155411940%2.326.5%12.3%14.2%2.6%3.893.88—
202521A MLEVisalia Rawhide60156414510%2.516.2%9.2%7.0%1.6%1.203.77—
202521A MLEVisalia Rawhide60156414510%2.516.2%9.2%7.0%1.6%1.203.77—
202521A RAWVisalia Rawhide60156414510%2.521.9%7.8%14.1%1.6%1.203.10—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202723MLBARI——0——————21.6%10.7%10.9%3.0%4.654.65—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202824MLB MLEARI160167016720%1.022.4%10.0%12.4%3.0%4.534.48+0.0
202824MLB CTXARI707307310%1.022.4%10.0%12.4%3.0%4.534.48+0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW707307310%1.022.4%10.0%12.4%3.0%4.534.10+0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW190020084419885280%1.122.4%10.0%12.4%3.0%4.534.10+1.1
Career— MLE491613055597731233%2.717.4%13.2%4.2%2.2%2.904.49+0.0
/ 200 IP— MLE75252008521481131833%2.717.4%13.2%4.2%2.2%2.904.49+0.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2025 AVisalia Rawhide · 15 IPFIP 3.10 → 3.77 (+0.67)K% 21.9% → 16.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF21.88%—×0.74016.19%
BB% (unintentional) /BF7.81%—×1.1809.22%
HR / BF /BF1.56%÷1.283×1.3001.58%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 157).

Result: FIP 3.10 → 3.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 ROKACL D-backs · 35 IPFIP 3.84 → 5.79 (+1.95)K% 26.5% → 18.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF26.45%—×0.68017.99%
BB% (unintentional) /BF12.26%—×1.25015.32%
HR / BF /BF2.58%÷0.875×1.4004.13%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 75).

Result: FIP 3.84 → 5.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 ROKDSL D-backs Black · 44 IPFIP 2.80 → 4.25 (+1.45)K% 27.7% → 18.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF27.72%—×0.68018.85%
BB% (unintentional) /BF11.41%—×1.25014.27%
HR / BF /BF1.09%÷0.896×1.4001.70%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 79).

Result: FIP 2.80 → 4.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 ROKDSL D-backs 1 · 36 IPFIP 2.68 → 3.78 (+1.09)K% 23.0% → 15.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.03%—×0.68015.66%
BB% (unintentional) /BF9.21%—×1.25011.51%
HR / BF /BF0.66%÷0.936×1.4000.98%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).

Result: FIP 2.68 → 3.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).