Max Roberts

P Birmingham Barons
Age 30 LHP 6'6" / 190 lbs AA
Overview
AAPROSPECT
MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202326A+HOU270275.673.7334.1%13.5%—K 26.3% · BB 15.5% · FIP 4.63
202427MIX3 levels380484.123.7529.3%16.3%—K 23.0% · BB 18.0% · FIP 4.94
202528MIX3 levels150165.063.8534.3%10.0%—K 34.3% · BB 10.0% · FIP 3.82
202629No MLB games played
2027PROJ30MLBCWS1014.804.8023.2%12.9%-0.0
2028PROJ31% MLB31MLBCWS7074.884.9622.8%12.9%-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsRaul Valdes (age 32) · Ryan O'Rourke (age 31) · Andrew Barbosa (age 29)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 108116vR 124
ERA4.80
FIP4.80
K%23.2%
BB%12.9%
K-BB%10.3%
Proj IP27
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 27 IP
K: +0.2 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)+0KBB: -1.3 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-1BBCONTACT: -0.8 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-1CONTACTSTAM: +1.1 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+1STAMTotal WAR: -0.08 (27 IP)-0.1WAR
-0.10.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
201720ROK MLEAZL Mariners10724114189270%2.410.7%9.9%0.9%2.5%5.184.79—
201720ROK RAWAZL Mariners10724114189270%2.415.8%7.9%7.9%1.8%5.183.80—
202124MIX MLE2 levels185341573921328%1.919.3%15.2%4.1%2.6%3.974.85—
202124MIX RAW2 levels185341573921328%1.924.8%13.4%11.5%1.9%3.973.81—
202225MIX MLE2 levels38048218682750%1.324.9%14.4%10.5%2.6%5.294.27—
202225MIX RAW2 levels38048218682750%1.331.2%12.4%18.8%2.3%5.293.31—
202326A+ MLEAsheville Tourists27027126431740%1.026.3%15.5%10.8%3.3%5.674.63—
202326A+ RAWAsheville Tourists27027126431740%1.034.1%13.5%20.6%3.2%5.673.73—
202427MIX MLE3 levels38048215633540%1.323.0%18.0%4.9%2.7%4.124.94—
202427MIX MLE3 levels38048215633540%1.323.0%18.0%4.9%2.7%4.124.94—
202427MIX RAW3 levels38048215633540%1.329.3%16.3%13.0%1.9%4.123.75—
202528MIX MLE3 levels150167024730%1.134.3%10.0%24.3%4.3%5.063.82—
202528MIX MLE3 levels150167024730%1.134.3%10.0%24.3%4.3%5.063.82—
202528MIX RAW3 levels150167024730%1.134.3%10.0%24.3%4.3%5.063.85—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202730MLBCWS10141100%1.023.2%12.9%10.3%3.0%4.804.80-0.0
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202831MLB MLECWS2002188201130%1.022.8%12.9%9.9%3.2%4.884.96-0.1
202831MLB CTXCWS707307410%1.022.8%12.9%9.9%3.2%4.884.96-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW607286410%1.122.8%12.9%9.9%3.2%4.884.58-0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW1900200844183122310%1.122.8%12.9%9.9%3.2%4.884.58-0.1
Career— MLE14612197900203132268%1.322.6%14.6%7.9%2.8%4.804.61-0.1
/ 200 IP— MLE14812200914206134268%1.322.6%14.6%7.9%2.8%4.804.61-1.0

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2025 AABirmingham Barons · 8 IPFIP 6.58 → 9.44 (+2.85)K% 30.0% → 24.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF30.00%—×0.81024.30%
BB% (unintentional) /BF15.00%—×1.10016.50%
HR / BF /BF7.50%÷0.784×1.20011.48%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 57).

Result: FIP 6.58 → 9.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 35 IPFIP 2.88 → 4.11 (+1.23)K% 30.9% → 23.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF30.92%—×0.77023.81%
BB% (unintentional) /BF13.16%—×1.15015.13%
HR / BF /BF1.32%÷0.817×1.2502.01%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 63).

Result: FIP 2.88 → 4.11, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 AABirmingham Barons · 12 IPFIP 5.94 → 7.21 (+1.27)K% 25.5% → 20.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.45%—×0.81020.62%
BB% (unintentional) /BF23.64%—×1.10026.00%
HR / BF /BF3.64%÷0.935×1.2004.67%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).

Result: FIP 5.94 → 7.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 A+Asheville Tourists · 27 IPFIP 3.67 → 4.63 (+0.97)K% 34.1% → 26.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF34.13%—×0.77026.28%
BB% (unintentional) /BF13.49%—×1.15015.52%
HR / BF /BF3.17%÷1.218×1.2503.26%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 144).

Result: FIP 3.67 → 4.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 A+Everett AquaSox · 42 IPFIP 3.39 → 4.27 (+0.88)K% 32.3% → 24.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF32.29%—×0.77024.86%
BB% (unintentional) /BF12.50%—×1.15014.37%
HR / BF /BF2.60%÷1.237×1.2502.63%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 147).

Result: FIP 3.39 → 4.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AModesto Nuts · 6 IPFIP 2.61 → 3.38 (+0.77)K% 23.1% → 17.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF23.08%—×0.74017.08%
BB% (unintentional) /BF11.54%—×1.18013.62%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷0.855×1.3000.00%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 71).

Result: FIP 2.61 → 3.38, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AModesto Nuts · 23 IPFIP 3.53 → 5.08 (+1.55)K% 29.6% → 21.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF29.59%—×0.74021.90%
BB% (unintentional) /BF14.29%—×1.18016.86%
HR / BF /BF2.04%÷0.861×1.3003.08%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 72).

Result: FIP 3.53 → 5.08, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAATacoma Rainiers · 11 IPFIP 4.10 → 4.47 (+0.37)K% 16.9% → 14.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF16.95%—×0.88014.92%
BB% (unintentional) /BF11.86%—×1.05012.46%
HR / BF /BF1.69%÷0.970×1.1001.92%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).

Result: FIP 4.10 → 4.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).