Josiah Ragsdale
OF Wisconsin Timber Rattlers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 21 | ACarolina Mudc… | 92 | .300/.413/.314 | 0 | 9 | 101 | — | .288/.380/.300 |
| 2026 | 22 | AA/A+2 orgs | 524 | .295/.418/.536 | 24 | 37 | 113 | — | .247/.344/.438 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 23 | MLBMIL | 9 | .230/.325/.414 | 0 | 0 | 109 | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ44% MLB | 24 | MLBMIL | 207 | .233/.327/.419 | 8 | 6 | 110 | 0.7 | |
| 2029PROJ63% MLB | 25 | MLBMIL | 303 | .234/.327/.420 | 12 | 9 | 111 | 1.1 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A | Carolina Mudcats | — | 92 | 70 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 300 | 413 | 314 | 727 | 14 | 382 | 16 | 17 | 340 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA | Springfield Cardinals | — | 260 | 213 | 56 | 7 | 1 | 17 | 42 | 71 | 3 | 13 | 1 | 263 | 391 | 545 | 936 | 282 | 307 | 27 | 16 | 406 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 264 | 214 | 70 | 18 | 2 | 7 | 44 | 64 | 3 | 24 | 2 | 327 | 445 | 528 | 973 | 201 | 438 | 24 | 17 | 427 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Carolina Mudcats | — | 92 | 80 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 287 | 380 | 300 | 680 | 13 | 386 | 22 | 12 | 317 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | AA MLE | Springfield Cardinals | — | 260 | 225 | 49 | 6 | 1 | 14 | 30 | 87 | 3 | 13 | 1 | 218 | 318 | 440 | 758 | 222 | 273 | 33 | 12 | 326 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | Wisconsin Timber Rattlers | — | 264 | 229 | 63 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 31 | 81 | 3 | 24 | 2 | 275 | 369 | 437 | 806 | 162 | 386 | 31 | 12 | 342 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Carolina Mudcats | — | 92 | 80 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 287 | 380 | 300 | 680 | 13 | 383 | 22 | 12 | 317 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A RAW | Carolina Mudcats | — | 92 | 70 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 300 | 413 | 314 | 727 | 14 | 382 | 16 | 17 | 340 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 524 | 454 | 110 | 20 | 3 | 19 | 61 | 168 | 6 | 37 | 3 | 242 | 340 | 425 | 765 | 183 | 337 | 32 | 12 | 334 | 112 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 524 | 427 | 126 | 25 | 3 | 24 | 86 | 135 | 6 | 37 | 3 | 295 | 418 | 536 | 955 | 241 | 376 | 26 | 16 | 417 | 112 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Carolina Mudcats | — | 92 | 80 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 287 | 380 | 300 | 680 | 13 | 386 | 22 | 12 | 317 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 524 | 452 | 110 | 20 | 3 | 19 | 61 | 168 | 6 | 37 | 3 | 243 | 340 | 427 | 767 | 184 | 330 | 32 | 12 | 334 | 112 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 21 | A MLE | Carolina Mudcats | — | 92 | 80 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 287 | 380 | 300 | 680 | 13 | 386 | 22 | 12 | 317 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 524 | 452 | 110 | 20 | 3 | 19 | 61 | 168 | 6 | 37 | 3 | 243 | 340 | 427 | 767 | 184 | 330 | 32 | 12 | 334 | 112 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB MLE | MIL | 4% | 525 | 456 | 106 | 19 | 2 | 20 | 59 | 149 | 5 | 17 | 2 | 232 | 326 | 412 | 738 | 180 | 295 | 28 | 11 | 329 | 109 | +5 | +3 | +1 | -3 | +11 | 0.8 |
| ▸ 2027 — real world (MLB) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB CTX | MIL | 4% | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 230 | 325 | 414 | 739 | 184 | 291 | 33 | 11 | 329 | 109 | +0 | +0 | +0 | -0 | +0 | 0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | MIL | 44% | 466 | 406 | 95 | 17 | 2 | 18 | 52 | 130 | 5 | 15 | 2 | 234 | 328 | 416 | 745 | 182 | 296 | 28 | 11 | 331 | 110 | +6 | +2 | +1 | -3 | +10 | 1.6 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | MIL | 63% | 482 | 421 | 99 | 18 | 2 | 18 | 53 | 133 | 5 | 15 | 2 | 235 | 329 | 418 | 747 | 183 | 296 | 28 | 11 | 332 | 111 | +6 | +2 | +1 | -3 | +10 | 1.7 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | MIL | 72% | 488 | 426 | 100 | 18 | 2 | 18 | 54 | 133 | 5 | 15 | 2 | 236 | 328 | 417 | 746 | 182 | 295 | 27 | 11 | 331 | 110 | +6 | +2 | +1 | -3 | +11 | 1.7 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIL | 74% | 487 | 426 | 100 | 18 | 2 | 18 | 53 | 132 | 5 | 14 | 2 | 235 | 327 | 414 | 741 | 179 | 294 | 27 | 11 | 330 | 109 | +5 | +2 | +1 | -3 | +11 | 1.6 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIL | 75% | 482 | 422 | 98 | 18 | 2 | 17 | 52 | 131 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 234 | 324 | 409 | 733 | 175 | 293 | 27 | 11 | 327 | 107 | +4 | +2 | -0 | -3 | +10 | 1.4 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIL | 74% | 474 | 416 | 96 | 17 | 2 | 17 | 51 | 130 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 231 | 321 | 402 | 724 | 171 | 292 | 27 | 11 | 323 | 105 | +3 | +2 | -1 | -3 | +10 | 1.1 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIL | 73% | 465 | 408 | 94 | 17 | 2 | 16 | 50 | 129 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 228 | 318 | 394 | 712 | 166 | 289 | 28 | 11 | 318 | 101 | +1 | +1 | -1 | -3 | +10 | 0.8 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB MLE | MIL | 72% | 453 | 398 | 90 | 16 | 2 | 15 | 48 | 128 | 4 | 9 | 2 | 224 | 313 | 384 | 697 | 160 | 286 | 28 | 11 | 312 | 97 | -1 | +1 | -2 | -3 | +10 | 0.5 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB MLE | MIL | 72% | 443 | 390 | 85 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 46 | 127 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 218 | 307 | 371 | 677 | 153 | 281 | 29 | 10 | 304 | 92 | -4 | +1 | -3 | -3 | +10 | 0.1 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | MIL | 44% | 207 | 180 | 42 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 23 | 58 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 233 | 327 | 419 | 746 | 186 | 291 | 28 | 11 | 331 | 110 | +3 | +1 | +0 | -1 | +4 | 0.7 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | MIL | 63% | 303 | 263 | 61 | 10 | 1 | 12 | 34 | 84 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 234 | 327 | 420 | 748 | 186 | 291 | 28 | 11 | 332 | 111 | +4 | +1 | +0 | -2 | +7 | 1.1 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | MIL | 72% | 350 | 305 | 72 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 39 | 96 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 234 | 327 | 419 | 746 | 185 | 291 | 27 | 11 | 331 | 110 | +4 | +1 | +1 | -2 | +8 | 1.2 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIL | 74% | 359 | 313 | 73 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 39 | 98 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 234 | 325 | 416 | 742 | 182 | 290 | 27 | 11 | 330 | 109 | +4 | +1 | +1 | -2 | +8 | 1.2 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIL | 75% | 361 | 316 | 74 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 39 | 98 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 232 | 323 | 411 | 734 | 178 | 289 | 27 | 11 | 326 | 107 | +3 | +2 | -0 | -2 | +8 | 1.1 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIL | 74% | 349 | 306 | 70 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 37 | 96 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 230 | 320 | 404 | 724 | 174 | 287 | 28 | 11 | 323 | 105 | +2 | +1 | -1 | -2 | +8 | 0.8 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIL | 73% | 339 | 297 | 67 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 36 | 94 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 226 | 316 | 396 | 712 | 169 | 285 | 28 | 11 | 318 | 101 | +1 | +1 | -1 | -2 | +7 | 0.6 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB CTX | MIL | 72% | 328 | 287 | 64 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 35 | 92 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 222 | 312 | 385 | 697 | 163 | 282 | 28 | 11 | 312 | 97 | -1 | +1 | -2 | -2 | +7 | 0.4 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB CTX | MIL | 72% | 320 | 281 | 61 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 33 | 92 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 217 | 305 | 372 | 677 | 155 | 277 | 29 | 10 | 304 | 92 | -3 | +1 | -2 | -2 | +7 | 0.1 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 2916 | 2548 | 584 | 97 | 12 | 109 | 315 | 808 | 27 | 77 | 11 | 229 | 320 | 405 | 725 | 176 | 288 | 28 | 11 | 323 | 106 | +16 | +11 | -3 | -17 | +63 | 7.1 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 568 | 131 | 22 | 3 | 24 | 70 | 180 | 6 | 17 | 2 | 231 | 321 | 407 | 728 | 176 | 291 | 28 | 11 | 323 | 106 | +4 | +2 | -1 | -4 | +14 | 1.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 5066 | 4429 | 1033 | 183 | 21 | 178 | 555 | 1421 | 50 | 165 | 25 | 233 | 325 | 405 | 730 | 171 | 300 | 28 | 11 | 325 | 106 | +27 | +16 | -4 | -27 | +96 | 11.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 568 | 133 | 23 | 3 | 23 | 71 | 182 | 6 | 21 | 3 | 234 | 325 | 407 | 732 | 173 | 301 | 28 | 11 | 325 | 106 | +4 | +2 | -1 | -4 | +14 | 1.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Wisconsin Timber Rattlers · 264 PAwOBA .418 → .342 (−76)K% 24.2% → 30.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.24% | ÷1.000 | ×1.270 | — | — | 30.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 11.81% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.14% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 0.90% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×1.007 | ×0.998 | 26.50% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.810 | ×1.007 | ×0.998 | 9.77% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.850 | ×1.007 | ×0.998 | 1.14% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 3.73% |
Factors used: league row Midwest League. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.007.
Result: wOBA .418 → .342; ISO .201 → .162; BABIP .438 → .386. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AASpringfield Cardinals · 260 PAwOBA .398 → .326 (−72)K% 27.3% → 33.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.31% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 33.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.15% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.027 | 11.61% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.15% | — | ×0.870 | — | ×1.027 | 1.03% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.977 | ×1.027 | 20.15% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.93% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.977 | ×1.027 | 4.15% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | ×0.977 | ×1.027 | 0.66% |
| Home runs /BIP | 11.97% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 9.84% |
Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.977.
Result: wOBA .398 → .326; ISO .282 → .231; BABIP .307 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ACarolina Mudcats · 92 PAwOBA .333 → .317 (−16)K% 16.3% → 21.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.30% | ÷1.033 | ×1.360 | — | — | 21.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 17.39% | ÷0.981 | ×0.690 | — | — | 12.23% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.09% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.85% |
| Singles /BIP | 36.36% | ÷0.948 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | — | 37.04% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.82% | ÷1.002 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | — | 1.58% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | — | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.214 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 143, 1B 90, 2B 100, 3B 130, K 107, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .333 → .317; ISO .014 → .014; BABIP .382 → .386. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).