Brett Wichrowski
P Biloxi Shuckers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 21 | 21 | 89 | 3.84 | 3.59 | 21.2% | 10.1% | — | K 17.0% · BB 11.2% · FIP 4.11 |
| 2025 | 22 | AAMIL | 22 | 22 | 99 | 3.44 | 3.63 | 16.7% | 10.2% | — | K 13.5% · BB 11.2% · FIP 4.03 |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 29 | 13 | 81 | 6.58 | 5.20 | 23.5% | 9.7% | — | K 19.5% · BB 9.8% · FIP 5.88 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBMIL | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5.20 | 5.20 | 18.8% | 11.2% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ44% MLB | 25 | MLBMIL | 7 | 7 | 39 | 5.11 | 5.05 | 20.3% | 10.6% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ67% MLB | 26 | MLBMIL | 10 | 10 | 60 | 4.98 | 4.93 | 21.1% | 10.3% | 0.4 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 89 | 386 | 82 | 39 | 7 | 100% | 4.2 | 17.0% | 11.2% | 5.8% | 1.9% | 3.84 | 4.11 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 89 | 386 | 82 | 39 | 7 | 100% | 4.2 | 17.0% | 11.2% | 5.8% | 1.9% | 3.84 | 4.11 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 21 | 89 | 386 | 82 | 39 | 7 | 100% | 4.2 | 21.2% | 10.1% | 11.1% | 1.8% | 3.84 | 3.59 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | AA MLE | Biloxi Shuckers | 22 | 22 | 99 | 432 | 72 | 44 | 5 | 100% | 4.5 | 13.5% | 11.2% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 3.44 | 4.03 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | AA MLE | Biloxi Shuckers | 22 | 22 | 99 | 432 | 72 | 44 | 5 | 100% | 4.5 | 13.5% | 11.2% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 3.44 | 4.03 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | AA RAW | Biloxi Shuckers | 22 | 22 | 99 | 432 | 72 | 44 | 5 | 100% | 4.5 | 16.7% | 10.2% | 6.5% | 1.2% | 3.44 | 3.63 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 13 | 81 | 362 | 85 | 35 | 18 | 45% | 2.8 | 19.5% | 9.8% | 9.7% | 5.8% | 6.58 | 5.88 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 13 | 81 | 362 | 85 | 35 | 18 | 45% | 2.8 | 19.5% | 9.8% | 9.7% | 5.8% | 6.58 | 5.88 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 13 | 81 | 362 | 85 | 35 | 18 | 45% | 2.8 | 23.5% | 9.7% | 13.8% | 5.0% | 6.58 | 5.20 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | MIL | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 2.0 | 18.8% | 11.2% | 7.6% | 3.4% | 5.20 | 5.20 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | MIL | 15 | 15 | 90 | 380 | 77 | 40 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.3% | 10.6% | 9.7% | 3.4% | 5.02 | 4.96 | +0.5 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | MIL | 15 | 15 | 90 | 380 | 80 | 39 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.1% | 10.3% | 10.8% | 3.4% | 4.89 | 4.84 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIL | 14 | 14 | 85 | 359 | 76 | 37 | 12 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.2% | 10.2% | 10.9% | 3.4% | 4.86 | 4.85 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIL | 13 | 13 | 80 | 339 | 71 | 35 | 12 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.1% | 10.3% | 10.7% | 3.5% | 4.89 | 4.92 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIL | 12 | 12 | 74 | 314 | 65 | 33 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.8% | 10.6% | 10.3% | 3.6% | 4.99 | 5.05 | +0.3 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIL | 11 | 11 | 67 | 284 | 58 | 31 | 11 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.5% | 10.9% | 9.6% | 3.8% | 5.13 | 5.23 | +0.1 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | MIL | 7 | 7 | 39 | 165 | 33 | 17 | 6 | 100% | 5.6 | 20.3% | 10.6% | 9.7% | 3.6% | 5.11 | 5.05 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | MIL | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 54 | 26 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.1% | 10.3% | 10.8% | 3.5% | 4.98 | 4.93 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIL | 11 | 11 | 66 | 279 | 59 | 29 | 10 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.2% | 10.2% | 10.9% | 3.6% | 4.95 | 4.94 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIL | 11 | 11 | 68 | 287 | 60 | 30 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.1% | 10.3% | 10.7% | 3.7% | 4.99 | 5.02 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIL | 11 | 11 | 65 | 274 | 57 | 29 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 20.8% | 10.6% | 10.3% | 3.8% | 5.09 | 5.15 | +0.3 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIL | 10 | 10 | 61 | 258 | 53 | 28 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.5% | 10.9% | 9.6% | 4.0% | 5.24 | 5.34 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 60 | 60 | 359 | 1516 | 316 | 159 | 56 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.9% | 10.5% | 10.4% | 3.7% | 5.05 | 4.69 | +2.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 176 | 89 | 31 | 100% | 6.0 | 20.9% | 10.5% | 10.4% | 3.7% | 5.05 | 4.69 | +1.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 72 | 56 | 269 | 1180 | 194 | 127 | 33 | 78% | 3.7 | 16.5% | 10.8% | 5.7% | 2.8% | 4.52 | 4.63 | +2.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 54 | 42 | 200 | 877 | 145 | 94 | 25 | 78% | 3.7 | 16.5% | 10.8% | 5.7% | 2.8% | 4.52 | 4.63 | +1.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AABiloxi Shuckers · 48 IPFIP 5.34 → 6.48 (+1.14)K% 24.6% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.64% | — | ×0.810 | 19.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.48% | — | ×1.100 | 10.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.69% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 6.82% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.34 → 6.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAANashville Sounds · 33 IPFIP 4.69 → 5.04 (+0.35)K% 21.9% → 18.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.85% | — | ×0.860 | 18.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.93% | — | ×0.900 | 8.94% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.97% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 4.37% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.69 → 5.04, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AABiloxi Shuckers · 99 IPFIP 3.62 → 4.03 (+0.41)K% 16.7% → 13.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.67% | — | ×0.810 | 13.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.19% | — | ×1.100 | 11.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.16% | ÷1.170 | ×1.200 | 1.19% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 134).
Result: FIP 3.62 → 4.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AABiloxi Shuckers · 74 IPFIP 3.93 → 4.38 (+0.44)K% 18.8% → 15.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.83% | — | ×0.810 | 15.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.11% | — | ×1.100 | 12.22% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.85% | ÷1.198 | ×1.200 | 1.85% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 140).
Result: FIP 3.93 → 4.38, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Wisconsin Timber Rattlers · 15 IPFIP 1.74 → 2.73 (+0.99)K% 33.9% → 26.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.87% | — | ×0.770 | 26.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.84% | — | ×1.150 | 5.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.61% | ÷0.979 | ×1.250 | 2.06% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 1.74 → 2.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.9 | 82 | 20.5% | 10.6% | 1.35 | 5.00 |
| Vicente Palacios ('87-'00, 1 WAR*) | 1.9 | 62 | 21.0%* | 10.0%* | 1.41* | 4.86* |
| Frank Wills ('83-'91, -1 WAR*) | 2.2 | 62 | 20.5%* | 10.2%* | 1.27* | 5.30* |
| Mickey Mahler ('77-'86, 0 WAR*) | 2.0 | 81 | 20.4%* | 10.3%* | 1.20* | 4.87* |
| Jake Faria ('23) | 1.0 | 68 | 20.9% | 10.3% | 1.32 | 4.87 |
| Scott Sanders ('99) | 3.4 | 97 | 21.2% | 9.3% | 1.23 | 4.86 |
| Chad Kuhl ('24) | 3.3 | 84 | 20.0% | 10.4% | 1.31 | 4.98 |