Ben Jacobs
P West Michigan Whitecaps| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 22 | 19 | 92 | 3.51 | 2.98 | 35.1% | 10.9% | — | K 26.8% · BB 12.6% · FIP 4.25 |
| 2027PROJ | 23 | MLBDET | — | — | 0 | 4.57 | 4.57 | 26.8% | 13.0% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 24 | MLBDET | 6 | 6 | 33 | 4.37 | 4.30 | 26.9% | 11.6% | 0.4 | |
| 2029PROJ66% MLB | 25 | MLBDET | 8 | 8 | 48 | 4.26 | 4.19 | 26.9% | 10.8% | 0.6 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 19 | 92 | 376 | 132 | 41 | 10 | 86% | 4.2 | 26.8% | 12.6% | 14.3% | 3.3% | 3.51 | 4.25 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 22 | 19 | 92 | 376 | 132 | 41 | 10 | 86% | 4.2 | 26.8% | 12.6% | 14.3% | 3.3% | 3.51 | 4.25 | — |
| 2026 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 22 | 19 | 92 | 376 | 132 | 41 | 10 | 86% | 4.2 | 35.1% | 10.9% | 24.2% | 2.7% | 3.51 | 2.98 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 23 | MLB | DET | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.8% | 13.0% | 13.9% | 3.1% | 4.57 | 4.57 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 24 | MLB MLE | DET | 14 | 14 | 76 | 320 | 86 | 37 | 10 | 100% | 5.4 | 26.9% | 11.6% | 15.3% | 3.1% | 4.44 | 4.37 | +0.9 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB MLE | DET | 12 | 12 | 73 | 308 | 83 | 33 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 26.9% | 10.8% | 16.1% | 3.1% | 4.33 | 4.26 | +1.0 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 12 | 12 | 73 | 307 | 82 | 33 | 9 | 100% | 6.0 | 26.9% | 10.6% | 16.2% | 3.1% | 4.27 | 4.23 | +1.0 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 12 | 12 | 71 | 299 | 80 | 32 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 26.8% | 10.6% | 16.1% | 3.1% | 4.27 | 4.27 | +0.9 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 11 | 11 | 68 | 285 | 76 | 31 | 9 | 100% | 6.1 | 26.6% | 10.8% | 15.8% | 3.2% | 4.32 | 4.36 | +0.8 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 12 | 12 | 69 | 293 | 83 | 30 | 10 | 100% | 5.8 | 28.4% | 10.2% | 18.2% | 3.4% | 4.26 | 4.22 | +1.0 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB MLE | DET | 10 | 10 | 63 | 266 | 75 | 28 | 9 | 100% | 6.3 | 28.0% | 10.5% | 17.5% | 3.6% | 4.34 | 4.39 | +0.7 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB MLE | DET | 9 | 9 | 56 | 236 | 65 | 26 | 9 | 100% | 6.2 | 27.6% | 10.9% | 16.8% | 3.8% | 4.49 | 4.60 | +0.5 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB MLE | DET | 8 | 8 | 48 | 205 | 56 | 23 | 8 | 100% | 6.1 | 27.2% | 11.3% | 15.9% | 4.0% | 4.69 | 4.82 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 24 | MLB CTX | DET | 6 | 6 | 33 | 139 | 37 | 16 | 4 | 100% | 5.5 | 26.9% | 11.6% | 15.3% | 2.9% | 4.37 | 4.30 | +0.4 |
| 2029 | 25 | MLB CTX | DET | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 55 | 22 | 6 | 100% | 6.0 | 26.9% | 10.8% | 16.1% | 2.9% | 4.26 | 4.19 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 10 | 10 | 58 | 245 | 66 | 26 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 26.9% | 10.6% | 16.2% | 2.9% | 4.20 | 4.16 | +0.8 |
| 2031 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 68 | 27 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 26.8% | 10.6% | 16.1% | 3.0% | 4.20 | 4.20 | +0.8 |
| 2032 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 67 | 27 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 26.6% | 10.8% | 15.8% | 3.1% | 4.25 | 4.29 | +0.7 |
| 2033 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 10 | 10 | 63 | 266 | 76 | 27 | 9 | 100% | 6.3 | 28.4% | 10.2% | 18.2% | 3.2% | 4.18 | 4.14 | +0.9 |
| 2034 | 30 | MLB CTX | DET | 10 | 10 | 58 | 245 | 69 | 26 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 28.0% | 10.5% | 17.5% | 3.4% | 4.26 | 4.31 | +0.7 |
| 2035 | 31 | MLB CTX | DET | 9 | 9 | 52 | 220 | 61 | 24 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 27.6% | 10.9% | 16.8% | 3.6% | 4.40 | 4.51 | +0.5 |
| 2036 | 32 | MLB CTX | DET | 8 | 8 | 45 | 190 | 52 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 5.6 | 27.2% | 11.3% | 15.9% | 3.9% | 4.60 | 4.73 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 80 | 80 | 478 | 2017 | 551 | 217 | 65 | 100% | 6.0 | 27.3% | 10.8% | 16.5% | 3.2% | 4.29 | 3.92 | +8.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 231 | 91 | 27 | 100% | 6.0 | 27.3% | 10.8% | 16.5% | 3.2% | 4.29 | 3.92 | +3.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 22 | 19 | 92 | 376 | 101 | 47 | 12 | 86% | 4.2 | 26.8% | 12.6% | 14.3% | 3.3% | 3.51 | 4.25 | +7.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 48 | 41 | 200 | 814 | 219 | 103 | 27 | 86% | 4.2 | 26.8% | 12.6% | 14.3% | 3.3% | 3.51 | 4.25 | +2.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 76 IPFIP 3.36 → 4.68 (+1.32)K% 34.5% → 26.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.50% | — | ×0.770 | 26.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.18% | — | ×1.150 | 12.86% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.19% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 3.99% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.36 → 4.68, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 17 IPFIP 1.09 → 2.14 (+1.05)K% 38.1% → 28.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 38.10% | — | ×0.740 | 28.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.52% | — | ×1.180 | 11.24% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.09 → 2.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.3 | 66 | 27.2% | 11.0% | 1.28 | 4.39 |
| Tim Stoddard ('75-'89, 4 WAR*) | 3.6 | 66 | 26.2%* | 11.2%* | 1.14* | 4.24* |
| Hansel Robles ('22) | 2.1 | 61 | 25.3% | 10.2% | 1.20 | 4.11 |
| Matt Barnes ('24) | 2.3 | 52 | 29.0% | 10.6% | 1.02 | 4.21 |
| Doug Bair ('76-'90, 7 WAR*) | 4.5 | 76 | 25.2%* | 10.4%* | 1.22* | 4.12* |
| Alberto Reyes ('95-'08, 5 WAR*) | 2.1 | 54 | 27.1%* | 10.2%* | 1.18* | 3.66* |
| Octavio Dotel ('13) | 4.8 | 79 | 28.4% | 10.2% | 1.11 | 3.78 |