Isaiah Coupet
P Spokane Indians| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | ACOL | 19 | 15 | 86 | 5.34 | 2.33 | 31.6% | 7.2% | — | K 23.4% · BB 8.5% · FIP 3.52 |
| 2025 | 22 | A+COL | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4.66 | 4.65 | 25.0% | 18.2% | — | K 25.0% · BB 18.2% · FIP 4.54 |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 16 | 1 | 23 | 5.40 | 5.03 | 17.6% | 13.7% | — | K 10.4% · BB 17.1% · FIP 6.24 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBCOL | — | — | 0 | 5.10 | 5.10 | 18.6% | 12.1% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 25 | MLBCOL | 7 | 0 | 7 | 4.92 | 4.86 | 19.8% | 11.1% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 20 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 5 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0.9 | 42.9% | 7.1% | 35.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.39 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 5 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0.9 | 42.9% | 7.1% | 35.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 1.02 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 19 | 15 | 86 | 376 | 119 | 27 | 7 | 79% | 4.5 | 23.4% | 8.5% | 14.9% | 2.4% | 5.34 | 3.52 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A MLE | Fresno Grizzlies | 19 | 15 | 86 | 376 | 119 | 27 | 7 | 79% | 4.5 | 23.4% | 8.5% | 14.9% | 2.4% | 5.34 | 3.52 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | A RAW | Fresno Grizzlies | 19 | 15 | 86 | 376 | 119 | 27 | 7 | 79% | 4.5 | 31.6% | 7.2% | 24.5% | 1.9% | 5.34 | 2.33 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | Spokane Indians | 3 | 0 | 10 | 44 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 0% | 3.2 | 25.0% | 18.2% | 6.8% | 2.3% | 4.66 | 4.54 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ MLE | Spokane Indians | 3 | 0 | 10 | 44 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 0% | 3.2 | 25.0% | 18.2% | 6.8% | 2.3% | 4.66 | 4.54 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | A+ RAW | Spokane Indians | 3 | 0 | 10 | 44 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 0% | 3.2 | 25.0% | 18.2% | 6.8% | 2.3% | 4.66 | 4.65 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 1 | 23 | 102 | 18 | 14 | 3 | 6% | 1.5 | 10.4% | 17.1% | -6.7% | 3.4% | 5.40 | 6.24 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 1 | 23 | 102 | 18 | 14 | 3 | 6% | 1.5 | 10.4% | 17.1% | -6.7% | 3.4% | 5.40 | 6.24 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 16 | 1 | 23 | 102 | 18 | 14 | 3 | 6% | 1.5 | 17.6% | 13.7% | 3.9% | 2.9% | 5.40 | 5.03 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | COL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18.6% | 12.1% | 6.5% | 3.0% | 5.10 | 5.10 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | COL | 16 | 0 | 16 | 69 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.8% | 11.1% | 8.7% | 3.0% | 4.92 | 4.86 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | COL | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.8% | 11.1% | 8.7% | 3.0% | 4.92 | 4.86 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.8% | 11.1% | 8.7% | 3.0% | 4.92 | 4.48 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 171 | 86 | 29 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.8% | 11.1% | 8.7% | 3.0% | 4.92 | 4.48 | +0.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 43 | 16 | 123 | 536 | 116 | 58 | 14 | 37% | 2.9 | 21.6% | 10.9% | 10.7% | 2.5% | 5.11 | 4.04 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 70 | 26 | 200 | 869 | 188 | 95 | 22 | 37% | 2.9 | 21.6% | 10.9% | 10.7% | 2.5% | 5.11 | 4.04 | -0.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Spokane Indians · 16 IPFIP 5.33 → 6.24 (+0.92)K% 13.5% → 10.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.51% | — | ×0.770 | 10.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.86% | — | ×1.150 | 17.09% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.70% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 3.38% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.33 → 6.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKACL Rockies · 7 IPFIP 4.00 → 5.90 (+1.90)K% 28.6% → 19.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.57% | — | ×0.680 | 19.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.71% | — | ×1.250 | 13.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.57% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 5.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.00 → 5.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Spokane Indians · 10 IPFIP 4.54 → 5.68 (+1.14)K% 25.0% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.770 | 19.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.18% | — | ×1.150 | 20.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.27% | ÷0.999 | ×1.250 | 2.84% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.54 → 5.68, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AFresno Grizzlies · 86 IPFIP 2.36 → 3.52 (+1.16)K% 31.6% → 23.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.65% | — | ×0.740 | 23.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.18% | — | ×1.180 | 8.47% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.86% | ÷1.002 | ×1.300 | 2.41% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.36 → 3.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).