Connor Oliver
P Altoona Curve| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | APIT | 24 | 9 | 79 | 5.24 | 3.38 | 23.4% | 10.3% | — | K 17.3% · BB 12.1% · FIP 4.34 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 23 | 7 | 52 | 4.50 | 5.16 | 25.5% | 15.6% | — | K 18.6% · BB 18.5% · FIP 6.50 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 28 | 22 | 115 | 4.47 | 4.92 | 24.5% | 13.0% | — | K 19.4% · BB 14.6% · FIP 5.88 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBPIT | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6.23 | 6.23 | 18.4% | 17.4% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 27 | MLBPIT | 5 | 5 | 28 | 6.05 | 6.07 | 18.8% | 16.5% | -0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ60% MLB | 28 | MLBPIT | 6 | 6 | 38 | 5.97 | 6.02 | 18.9% | 16.0% | -0.3 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 22 | ROK MLE | ACL Royals | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 3.10 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | ROK RAW | ACL Royals | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 3.10 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | 24 | 9 | 79 | 350 | 82 | 36 | 6 | 38% | 3.3 | 17.3% | 12.1% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 5.24 | 4.34 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A MLE | Bradenton Marauders | 24 | 9 | 79 | 350 | 82 | 36 | 6 | 38% | 3.3 | 17.3% | 12.1% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 5.24 | 4.34 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | A RAW | Bradenton Marauders | 24 | 9 | 79 | 350 | 82 | 36 | 6 | 38% | 3.3 | 23.4% | 10.3% | 13.1% | 1.7% | 5.24 | 3.38 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 7 | 52 | 231 | 59 | 36 | 9 | 30% | 2.3 | 18.6% | 18.5% | 0.1% | 4.8% | 4.50 | 6.50 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 7 | 52 | 231 | 59 | 36 | 9 | 30% | 2.3 | 18.6% | 18.5% | 0.1% | 4.8% | 4.50 | 6.50 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 7 | 52 | 231 | 59 | 36 | 9 | 30% | 2.3 | 25.5% | 15.6% | 10.0% | 3.9% | 4.50 | 5.16 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 22 | 115 | 515 | 126 | 67 | 20 | 79% | 4.1 | 19.4% | 14.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | 4.47 | 5.88 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 22 | 115 | 515 | 126 | 67 | 20 | 79% | 4.1 | 19.4% | 14.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | 4.47 | 5.88 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 28 | 22 | 115 | 515 | 126 | 67 | 20 | 79% | 4.1 | 24.5% | 13.0% | 11.5% | 3.9% | 4.47 | 4.92 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | PIT | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 1.0 | 18.4% | 17.4% | 1.0% | 3.8% | 6.23 | 6.23 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | PIT | 12 | 12 | 75 | 318 | 60 | 53 | 12 | 100% | 6.3 | 18.8% | 16.5% | 2.2% | 3.8% | 6.05 | 6.07 | -0.5 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | PIT | 10 | 10 | 64 | 270 | 51 | 43 | 10 | 100% | 6.4 | 18.9% | 16.0% | 2.8% | 3.8% | 5.97 | 6.02 | -0.4 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB MLE | PIT | 9 | 9 | 58 | 244 | 46 | 39 | 10 | 100% | 6.4 | 18.8% | 15.8% | 2.9% | 3.9% | 5.99 | 6.06 | -0.4 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB MLE | PIT | 9 | 9 | 53 | 222 | 41 | 35 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 18.5% | 15.9% | 2.6% | 4.1% | 6.09 | 6.19 | -0.4 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | PIT | 5 | 5 | 28 | 118 | 22 | 20 | 4 | 100% | 5.6 | 18.8% | 16.5% | 2.2% | 3.8% | 6.05 | 6.07 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | PIT | 6 | 6 | 38 | 160 | 30 | 26 | 6 | 100% | 6.3 | 18.9% | 16.0% | 2.8% | 3.8% | 5.97 | 6.02 | -0.3 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB CTX | PIT | 7 | 7 | 41 | 173 | 33 | 27 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.8% | 15.8% | 2.9% | 3.9% | 5.99 | 6.06 | -0.3 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB CTX | PIT | 7 | 7 | 41 | 173 | 32 | 28 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 18.5% | 15.9% | 2.6% | 4.1% | 6.09 | 6.19 | -0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 24 | 24 | 148 | 627 | 117 | 101 | 25 | 100% | 6.2 | 18.7% | 16.0% | 2.7% | 3.9% | 6.02 | 5.71 | -0.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 158 | 136 | 34 | 100% | 6.1 | 18.7% | 16.0% | 2.7% | 3.9% | 6.02 | 5.71 | -0.7 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 76 | 38 | 247 | 1101 | 203 | 160 | 43 | 50% | 3.2 | 18.5% | 14.5% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 4.71 | 5.51 | -1.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 62 | 31 | 200 | 893 | 165 | 130 | 35 | 50% | 3.2 | 18.5% | 14.5% | 3.9% | 3.9% | 4.71 | 5.51 | -1.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAltoona Curve · 71 IPFIP 5.94 → 7.06 (+1.12)K% 21.7% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.67% | — | ×0.810 | 17.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.69% | — | ×1.100 | 13.96% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.57% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 6.69% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.94 → 7.06, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Greensboro Grasshoppers · 44 IPFIP 2.92 → 3.89 (+0.97)K% 29.2% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.17% | — | ×0.770 | 22.46% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.54% | — | ×1.150 | 15.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.04% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 1.30% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.92 → 3.89, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 A+Greensboro Grasshoppers · 50 IPFIP 5.31 → 6.50 (+1.20)K% 24.1% → 18.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.11% | — | ×0.770 | 18.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.07% | — | ×1.150 | 18.48% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.02% | ÷1.048 | ×1.250 | 4.79% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).
Result: FIP 5.31 → 6.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ABradenton Marauders · 79 IPFIP 3.37 → 4.34 (+0.98)K% 23.4% → 17.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.43% | — | ×0.740 | 17.34% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.29% | — | ×1.180 | 12.14% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.71% | ÷1.046 | ×1.300 | 2.13% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 3.37 → 4.34, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.6 | 64 | 18.7% | 16.4% | 1.50 | 6.07 |
| Doug Creek ('05) | 1.4 | 58 | 22.2% | 15.1% | 1.52 | 5.32 |
| Richie Lewis ('98) | 1.5 | 59 | 18.1% | 14.1% | 1.38 | 4.88 |
| Paul Spoljaric ('00) | 1.4 | 69 | 22.1% | 12.9% | 1.33 | 5.52 |
| Dwayne Henry ('84-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.7 | 67 | 23.8%* | 14.2%* | 0.90* | 5.02* |
| Bill Laxton ('70-'77, -3 WAR*) | 1.2 | 61 | 26.1%* | 14.4%* | 1.87* | 5.39* |
| Ed Glynn ('75-'85, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 53 | 23.5%* | 12.9%* | 1.22* | 4.69* |