Jimmy Robbins
P Round Rock Express| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 24 | MIX3 levels | 21 | 15 | 76 | 2.59 | 2.81 | 30.2% | 9.8% | — | K 23.3% · BB 11.3% · FIP 3.85 | |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 25 | 20 | 93 | 5.59 | 4.53 | 21.0% | 15.2% | — | K 17.8% · BB 15.2% · FIP 4.69 | |
| 2024 | 26 | AAATEX | 11 | 0 | 13 | 6.39 | 5.47 | 22.8% | 17.5% | — | K 19.6% · BB 15.8% · FIP 5.73 | |
| 2025 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 29 | MLBTEX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.53 | 4.53 | 22.6% | 10.3% | 0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 30 | MLBTEX | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4.62 | 4.69 | 22.3% | 10.5% | 0.1 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Blue Jays | 3 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2.3 | 35.7% | 0.0% | 35.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.08 | — |
| 2019 | 21 | ROK RAW | GCL Blue Jays | 3 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2.3 | 35.7% | 0.0% | 35.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.24 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 21 | 15 | 76 | 325 | 98 | 32 | 6 | 71% | 3.6 | 23.3% | 11.3% | 12.0% | 2.3% | 2.59 | 3.85 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 21 | 15 | 76 | 325 | 98 | 32 | 6 | 71% | 3.6 | 30.2% | 9.8% | 20.3% | 1.8% | 2.59 | 2.81 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 25 | 20 | 93 | 434 | 91 | 66 | 9 | 80% | 3.7 | 17.8% | 15.2% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 5.59 | 4.69 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 25 | 20 | 93 | 434 | 91 | 66 | 9 | 80% | 3.7 | 21.0% | 15.2% | 5.8% | 2.1% | 5.59 | 4.53 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Round Rock Express | 11 | 0 | 13 | 57 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 19.6% | 15.8% | 3.8% | 4.2% | 6.39 | 5.73 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA MLE | Round Rock Express | 11 | 0 | 13 | 57 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 19.6% | 15.8% | 3.8% | 4.2% | 6.39 | 5.73 | — |
| 2024 | 26 | AAA RAW | Round Rock Express | 11 | 0 | 13 | 57 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.8% | 17.5% | 5.3% | 3.5% | 6.39 | 5.47 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB | TEX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1.0 | 22.6% | 10.3% | 12.3% | 3.0% | 4.53 | 4.53 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | TEX | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 22.3% | 10.5% | 11.8% | 3.2% | 4.62 | 4.69 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | TEX | 1 | 1 | 7 | 30 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 7.0 | 22.3% | 10.5% | 11.8% | 3.2% | 4.62 | 4.69 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 7 | 31 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 7.4 | 22.3% | 10.5% | 11.8% | 3.2% | 4.62 | 4.31 | +0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 190 | 82 | 27 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.3% | 10.5% | 11.8% | 3.2% | 4.62 | 4.31 | +2.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 60 | 35 | 189 | 844 | 174 | 112 | 19 | 58% | 3.2 | 20.6% | 13.2% | 7.4% | 2.3% | 4.23 | 4.29 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 63 | 37 | 200 | 892 | 184 | 118 | 20 | 58% | 3.2 | 20.6% | 13.2% | 7.4% | 2.3% | 4.23 | 4.29 | +1.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAARound Rock Express · 13 IPFIP 5.32 → 5.73 (+0.41)K% 22.8% → 19.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.81% | — | ×0.860 | 19.61% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.54% | — | ×0.900 | 15.79% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.51% | ÷0.928 | ×1.100 | 4.16% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 86).
Result: FIP 5.32 → 5.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 87 IPFIP 3.97 → 4.69 (+0.72)K% 21.9% → 17.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.94% | — | ×0.810 | 17.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.78% | — | ×1.100 | 15.15% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.79% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 2.14% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.97 → 4.69, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAABuffalo Bisons · 7 IPFIP 8.33 → 8.63 (+0.30)K% 11.9% → 10.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 11.90% | — | ×0.860 | 10.24% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 28.57% | — | ×0.900 | 25.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.76% | ÷0.916 | ×1.100 | 5.72% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 8.33 → 8.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Vancouver Canadians · 35 IPFIP 3.40 → 4.63 (+1.23)K% 29.7% → 22.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.68% | — | ×0.770 | 22.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.97% | — | ×1.150 | 12.61% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.58% | ÷0.952 | ×1.250 | 3.39% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 3.40 → 4.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 24 IPFIP 2.75 → 3.45 (+0.70)K% 26.8% → 21.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.80% | — | ×0.810 | 21.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.19% | — | ×1.100 | 6.80% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.06% | ÷1.027 | ×1.200 | 2.41% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).
Result: FIP 2.75 → 3.45, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ADunedin Blue Jays · 17 IPFIP 1.65 → 2.72 (+1.06)K% 35.6% → 26.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.62% | — | ×0.740 | 26.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.33% | — | ×1.180 | 14.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.916 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 1.65 → 2.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKGCL Blue Jays · 7 IPFIP 0.08 → 1.05 (+0.97)K% 35.7% → 24.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.71% | — | ×0.680 | 24.29% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 0.08 → 1.05, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).