Paul Wilson
P Lakeland Flying Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19 | ROKDET | 11 | 8 | 35 | 6.62 | 5.70 | 18.8% | 19.9% | — | K 12.8% · BB 24.9% · FIP 6.96 |
| 2025 | 20 | ADET | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4.26 | 2.47 | 34.4% | 18.8% | — | K 34.4% · BB 18.8% · FIP 2.57 |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 13 | 9 | 24 | 8.62 | 5.10 | 26.6% | 23.4% | — | K 20.0% · BB 29.5% · FIP 6.63 |
| 2027PROJ | 22 | MLBDET | — | — | 0 | 5.79 | 5.79 | 22.1% | 20.0% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 23 | MLBDET | 9 | 9 | 48 | 5.36 | 5.21 | 23.1% | 16.9% | 0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ70% MLB | 24 | MLBDET | 13 | 13 | 75 | 5.05 | 4.89 | 23.7% | 14.9% | 0.4 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | 11 | 8 | 35 | 181 | 34 | 36 | 4 | 73% | 3.2 | 12.8% | 24.9% | -12.1% | 3.3% | 6.62 | 6.96 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | 11 | 8 | 35 | 181 | 34 | 36 | 4 | 73% | 3.2 | 12.8% | 24.9% | -12.1% | 3.3% | 6.62 | 6.96 | — |
| 2024 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Tigers | 11 | 8 | 35 | 181 | 34 | 36 | 4 | 73% | 3.2 | 18.8% | 19.9% | -1.1% | 2.2% | 6.62 | 5.70 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 3 | 2 | 6 | 32 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 67% | 2.1 | 34.4% | 18.8% | 15.6% | 0.0% | 4.26 | 2.57 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 3 | 2 | 6 | 32 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 67% | 2.1 | 34.4% | 18.8% | 15.6% | 0.0% | 4.26 | 2.57 | — |
| 2025 | 20 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 3 | 2 | 6 | 32 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 67% | 2.1 | 34.4% | 18.8% | 15.6% | 0.0% | 4.26 | 2.47 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 13 | 9 | 24 | 128 | 34 | 30 | 2 | 69% | 1.8 | 20.0% | 29.5% | -9.5% | 2.7% | 8.62 | 6.63 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 13 | 9 | 24 | 128 | 34 | 30 | 2 | 69% | 1.8 | 20.0% | 29.5% | -9.5% | 2.7% | 8.62 | 6.63 | — |
| 2026 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 13 | 9 | 24 | 128 | 34 | 30 | 2 | 69% | 1.8 | 26.6% | 23.4% | 3.1% | 1.6% | 8.62 | 5.10 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 22 | MLB | DET | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | 20.0% | 2.0% | 3.0% | 5.79 | 5.79 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 23 | MLB MLE | DET | 18 | 18 | 97 | 408 | 94 | 69 | 12 | 100% | 5.4 | 23.1% | 16.9% | 6.2% | 2.9% | 5.43 | 5.28 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB MLE | DET | 19 | 19 | 107 | 451 | 107 | 67 | 13 | 100% | 5.6 | 23.7% | 14.9% | 8.8% | 2.9% | 5.12 | 4.96 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB MLE | DET | 20 | 20 | 114 | 483 | 116 | 66 | 14 | 100% | 5.7 | 24.0% | 13.6% | 10.4% | 2.9% | 4.90 | 4.77 | +0.8 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 19 | 19 | 113 | 479 | 116 | 64 | 14 | 100% | 6.0 | 24.1% | 13.4% | 10.8% | 2.9% | 4.79 | 4.73 | +0.9 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 18 | 18 | 110 | 466 | 112 | 63 | 14 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.1% | 13.5% | 10.7% | 3.0% | 4.78 | 4.77 | +0.8 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 18 | 18 | 105 | 444 | 107 | 60 | 14 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.0% | 13.6% | 10.4% | 3.1% | 4.82 | 4.85 | +0.7 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 16 | 16 | 98 | 414 | 98 | 57 | 13 | 100% | 6.1 | 23.8% | 13.8% | 9.9% | 3.2% | 4.92 | 4.99 | +0.5 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB MLE | DET | 15 | 15 | 89 | 377 | 88 | 53 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.4% | 14.1% | 9.3% | 3.4% | 5.07 | 5.16 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 23 | MLB CTX | DET | 9 | 9 | 48 | 203 | 47 | 34 | 6 | 100% | 5.3 | 23.1% | 16.9% | 6.2% | 2.8% | 5.36 | 5.21 | +0.1 |
| 2029 | 24 | MLB CTX | DET | 13 | 13 | 75 | 317 | 75 | 47 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 23.7% | 14.9% | 8.8% | 2.8% | 5.05 | 4.89 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 25 | MLB CTX | DET | 16 | 16 | 93 | 393 | 94 | 53 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 24.0% | 13.6% | 10.4% | 2.8% | 4.83 | 4.70 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 16 | 16 | 99 | 418 | 101 | 56 | 12 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.1% | 13.4% | 10.8% | 2.8% | 4.72 | 4.66 | +0.8 |
| 2032 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 17 | 17 | 100 | 422 | 102 | 57 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 24.1% | 13.5% | 10.7% | 2.8% | 4.71 | 4.70 | +0.7 |
| 2033 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 16 | 16 | 97 | 410 | 98 | 56 | 12 | 100% | 6.1 | 24.0% | 13.6% | 10.4% | 2.9% | 4.75 | 4.78 | +0.6 |
| 2034 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 15 | 15 | 91 | 384 | 91 | 53 | 12 | 100% | 6.1 | 23.8% | 13.8% | 9.9% | 3.1% | 4.85 | 4.92 | +0.4 |
| 2035 | 30 | MLB CTX | DET | 14 | 14 | 84 | 355 | 83 | 50 | 12 | 100% | 6.0 | 23.4% | 14.1% | 9.3% | 3.3% | 4.99 | 5.08 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 116 | 116 | 685 | 2894 | 689 | 405 | 84 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.8% | 14.0% | 9.8% | 2.9% | 4.87 | 4.46 | +7.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 201 | 118 | 25 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.8% | 14.0% | 9.8% | 2.9% | 4.87 | 4.46 | +2.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 27 | 19 | 66 | 341 | 60 | 89 | 9 | 70% | 2.4 | 17.5% | 26.0% | -8.5% | 2.7% | 7.13 | 6.42 | +4.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 82 | 58 | 200 | 1039 | 182 | 270 | 28 | 70% | 2.4 | 17.5% | 26.0% | -8.5% | 2.7% | 7.13 | 6.42 | +1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 17 IPFIP 5.12 → 6.63 (+1.51)K% 27.1% → 20.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.08% | — | ×0.740 | 20.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 25.00% | — | ×1.180 | 29.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.08% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 2.71% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.12 → 6.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKFCL Tigers · 7 IPFIP 3.36 → 4.63 (+1.27)K% 25.0% → 17.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.680 | 17.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.75% | — | ×1.250 | 23.44% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.36 → 4.63, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 6 IPFIP 2.57 → 3.75 (+1.18)K% 34.4% → 25.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.38% | — | ×0.740 | 25.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.75% | — | ×1.180 | 22.12% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.864 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 73).
Result: FIP 2.57 → 3.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Tigers · 35 IPFIP 5.25 → 6.96 (+1.71)K% 18.8% → 12.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.78% | — | ×0.680 | 12.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.89% | — | ×1.250 | 24.86% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.21% | ÷0.952 | ×1.400 | 3.25% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 5.25 → 6.96, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 4.6 | 103 | 23.6% | 14.7% | 1.17 | 5.05 |
| Les Cain ('68-'72, 2 WAR*) | 1.9 | 93 | 24.6%* | 12.9%* | 1.00* | 4.66* |
| Kazuhisa Ishii ('02-'05, 1 WAR*) | 2.8 | 141 | 19.8%* | 13.6%* | 1.14* | 4.72* |
| Jason Bere ('03) | 5.6 | 123 | 18.4% | 12.6% | 1.17 | 5.14 |
| Scipio Spinks ('69-'73, 2 WAR*) | 1.0 | 67 | 23.7%* | 12.2%* | 1.04* | 4.52* |
| Tony Saunders ('99) | 1.7 | 115 | 19.7% | 13.2% | 0.86 | 4.56 |
| Floyd Youmans ('85-'89, 6 WAR*) | 2.7 | 108 | 23.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.06* | 4.23* |