Jake Miller
P West Michigan Whitecaps| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | MIX3 levels | 24 | 3 | 87 | 1.85 | 2.05 | 30.4% | 5.0% | — | K 23.2% · BB 6.1% · FIP 3.00 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 6 | 6 | 20 | 1.80 | 2.25 | 25.3% | 4.8% | — | K 19.3% · BB 6.6% · FIP 3.23 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX4 levels | 7 | 7 | 23 | 0.77 | 2.63 | 27.6% | 9.2% | — | K 27.6% · BB 9.2% · FIP 2.57 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBDET | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.02 | 4.02 | 22.0% | 6.3% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 27 | MLBDET | 4 | 4 | 22 | 4.01 | 4.02 | 22.1% | 6.7% | 0.3 | |
| 2029PROJ60% MLB | 28 | MLBDET | 6 | 6 | 34 | 4.08 | 4.12 | 22.1% | 7.0% | 0.5 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 5 | 5 | 15 | 71 | 21 | 3 | 5 | 100% | 2.9 | 21.9% | 5.0% | 16.9% | 7.2% | 8.59 | 5.81 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 5 | 5 | 15 | 71 | 21 | 3 | 5 | 100% | 2.9 | 29.6% | 4.2% | 25.4% | 7.0% | 8.59 | 5.28 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 9 | 35 | 162 | 42 | 18 | 5 | 75% | 2.9 | 17.2% | 14.1% | 3.1% | 3.8% | 7.13 | 5.50 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 9 | 35 | 162 | 42 | 18 | 5 | 75% | 2.9 | 25.9% | 11.1% | 14.8% | 3.1% | 7.13 | 4.09 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 3 | 87 | 342 | 104 | 17 | 5 | 12% | 3.6 | 23.2% | 6.1% | 17.0% | 2.0% | 1.85 | 3.00 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 3 | 87 | 342 | 104 | 17 | 5 | 12% | 3.6 | 23.2% | 6.1% | 17.0% | 2.0% | 1.85 | 3.00 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 24 | 3 | 87 | 342 | 104 | 17 | 5 | 12% | 3.6 | 30.4% | 5.0% | 25.4% | 1.5% | 1.85 | 2.05 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 6 | 20 | 83 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 19.3% | 6.6% | 12.8% | 1.7% | 1.80 | 3.23 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 6 | 6 | 20 | 83 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 19.3% | 6.6% | 12.8% | 1.7% | 1.80 | 3.23 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 6 | 6 | 20 | 83 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 25.3% | 4.8% | 20.5% | 1.2% | 1.80 | 2.25 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 7 | 7 | 23 | 87 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 27.6% | 9.2% | 18.4% | 1.1% | 0.77 | 2.57 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 7 | 7 | 23 | 87 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 27.6% | 9.2% | 18.4% | 1.1% | 0.77 | 2.57 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 7 | 7 | 23 | 87 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 100% | 3.3 | 27.6% | 9.2% | 18.4% | 1.1% | 0.77 | 2.63 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | DET | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 2.0 | 22.0% | 6.3% | 15.7% | 2.9% | 4.02 | 4.02 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 10 | 10 | 59 | 247 | 55 | 17 | 7 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.1% | 6.7% | 15.5% | 3.0% | 4.08 | 4.09 | +0.9 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 9 | 9 | 57 | 240 | 53 | 17 | 7 | 100% | 6.3 | 22.1% | 7.0% | 15.1% | 3.1% | 4.15 | 4.19 | +0.8 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 4 | 4 | 22 | 93 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 100% | 5.5 | 22.1% | 6.7% | 15.5% | 2.9% | 4.01 | 4.02 | +0.3 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 6 | 6 | 34 | 144 | 32 | 10 | 4 | 100% | 5.7 | 22.1% | 7.0% | 15.1% | 2.9% | 4.08 | 4.12 | +0.5 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 9 | 9 | 56 | 238 | 53 | 16 | 7 | 100% | 6.3 | 22.1% | 6.9% | 15.2% | 2.9% | 4.05 | 3.70 | +1.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 188 | 57 | 25 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.1% | 6.9% | 15.2% | 2.9% | 4.05 | 3.70 | +4.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 54 | 30 | 181 | 745 | 163 | 61 | 20 | 56% | 3.3 | 21.8% | 8.2% | 13.7% | 2.7% | 3.29 | 3.79 | +1.7 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 60 | 33 | 200 | 825 | 180 | 67 | 22 | 56% | 3.3 | 21.8% | 8.2% | 13.7% | 2.7% | 3.29 | 3.79 | +3.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 13 IPFIP 3.19 → 4.10 (+0.91)K% 24.5% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.49% | — | ×0.770 | 18.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.16% | — | ×1.150 | 9.39% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.04% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 2.55% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.19 → 4.10, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAErie SeaWolves · 17 IPFIP 2.66 → 3.23 (+0.57)K% 23.9% → 19.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.88% | — | ×0.810 | 19.34% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.97% | — | ×1.100 | 6.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.49% | ÷1.056 | ×1.200 | 1.70% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 2.66 → 3.23, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 62 IPFIP 1.67 → 2.67 (+1.00)K% 33.9% → 25.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.89% | — | ×0.740 | 25.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.86% | — | ×1.180 | 6.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.26% | ÷1.099 | ×1.300 | 1.49% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).
Result: FIP 1.67 → 2.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 20 IPFIP 2.85 → 3.89 (+1.04)K% 23.3% → 17.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.26% | — | ×0.770 | 17.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.49% | — | ×1.150 | 4.01% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.33% | ÷0.889 | ×1.250 | 3.27% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 2.85 → 3.89, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 29 IPFIP 4.59 → 5.50 (+0.92)K% 23.2% → 17.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.24% | — | ×0.740 | 17.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.97% | — | ×1.180 | 14.13% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.52% | ÷1.216 | ×1.300 | 3.76% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 143).
Result: FIP 4.59 → 5.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Tigers · 6 IPFIP -0.07 → 1.31 (+1.37)K% 45.0% → 30.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 45.00% | — | ×0.680 | 30.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.00% | — | ×1.250 | 6.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.924 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 85).
Result: FIP -0.07 → 1.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 15 IPFIP 5.00 → 5.81 (+0.81)K% 29.6% → 21.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.58% | — | ×0.740 | 21.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.23% | — | ×1.180 | 4.99% |
| HR / BF /BF | 7.04% | ÷1.279 | ×1.300 | 7.16% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 156).
Result: FIP 5.00 → 5.81, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.9 | 58 | 22.1% | 6.7% | 1.16 | 4.08 |
| Dale Thayer ('15) | 1.3 | 63 | 20.4% | 6.3% | 1.07 | 3.47 |
| Junichi Tazawa ('18) | 2.0 | 49 | 22.2% | 6.5% | 1.12 | 4.12 |
| Shawn Tolleson ('16) | 1.1 | 54 | 23.1% | 8.3% | 1.28 | 3.92 |
| Tim Crews ('87-'92, 3 WAR*) | 2.1 | 71 | 20.8%* | 6.2%* | 1.09* | 4.11* |
| Cris Carpenter ('88-'96, 2 WAR*) | 2.1 | 69 | 18.3%* | 7.4%* | 1.15* | 4.29* |
| Dave Baldwin ('66-'73, 2 WAR*) | 1.1 | 56 | 22.2%* | 9.2%* | 0.96* | 3.97* |