Avery Weems
P Frisco RoughRiders| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 25 | AATEX | 26 | 17 | 91 | 5.14 | 3.80 | 26.3% | 7.9% | — | K 21.3% · BB 8.6% · FIP 4.87 | |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 7 | 1 | 8 | 11.25 | 4.10 | 17.9% | 7.7% | — | K 17.9% · BB 7.7% · FIP 3.97 | |
| 2025 | 28 | AATEX | 34 | 0 | 38 | 6.63 | 4.21 | 25.3% | 7.5% | — | K 20.5% · BB 8.2% · FIP 5.13 | |
| 2026 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBTEX | — | — | 0 | 4.49 | 4.49 | 21.6% | 8.6% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 31 | MLBTEX | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.60 | 4.68 | 21.4% | 9.0% | -0.0 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 22 | ROK MLE | ACL White Sox | 4 | 4 | 13 | 51 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 3.2 | 18.7% | 7.4% | 11.3% | 0.0% | 0.69 | 2.46 | — |
| 2019 | 22 | ROK RAW | ACL White Sox | 4 | 4 | 13 | 51 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 3.2 | 27.5% | 5.9% | 21.6% | 0.0% | 0.69 | 1.64 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | Hickory Crawdads | 20 | 19 | 85 | 359 | 124 | 27 | 16 | 95% | 4.3 | 26.6% | 8.6% | 17.9% | 6.3% | 5.06 | 5.42 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ RAW | Hickory Crawdads | 20 | 19 | 85 | 359 | 124 | 27 | 16 | 95% | 4.3 | 34.5% | 7.5% | 27.0% | 4.5% | 5.06 | 3.58 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | AA MLE | Frisco RoughRiders | 26 | 17 | 91 | 407 | 107 | 32 | 14 | 65% | 3.5 | 21.3% | 8.6% | 12.6% | 4.5% | 5.14 | 4.87 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | AA RAW | Frisco RoughRiders | 26 | 17 | 91 | 407 | 107 | 32 | 14 | 65% | 3.5 | 26.3% | 7.9% | 18.4% | 3.4% | 5.14 | 3.80 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 14% | 1.1 | 17.9% | 7.7% | 10.3% | 2.6% | 11.25 | 3.97 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 7 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 14% | 1.1 | 17.9% | 7.7% | 10.3% | 2.6% | 11.25 | 3.97 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 7 | 1 | 8 | 39 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 14% | 1.1 | 17.9% | 7.7% | 10.3% | 2.6% | 11.25 | 4.10 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AA MLE | Frisco RoughRiders | 34 | 0 | 38 | 174 | 44 | 13 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.5% | 8.2% | 12.3% | 4.9% | 6.63 | 5.13 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AA MLE | Frisco RoughRiders | 34 | 0 | 38 | 174 | 44 | 13 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 20.5% | 8.2% | 12.3% | 4.9% | 6.63 | 5.13 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AA RAW | Frisco RoughRiders | 34 | 0 | 38 | 174 | 44 | 13 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 25.3% | 7.5% | 17.8% | 4.0% | 6.63 | 4.21 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB | TEX | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21.6% | 8.6% | 13.1% | 3.2% | 4.49 | 4.49 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | TEX | 18 | 0 | 18 | 78 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 9.0% | 12.4% | 3.4% | 4.60 | 4.68 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | TEX | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 9.0% | 12.4% | 3.4% | 4.60 | 4.68 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 6 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 9.0% | 12.4% | 3.4% | 4.60 | 4.30 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 173 | 69 | 35 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.4% | 9.0% | 12.4% | 3.4% | 4.60 | 4.30 | +0.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 91 | 41 | 235 | 1030 | 234 | 87 | 51 | 45% | 2.6 | 22.7% | 8.5% | 14.3% | 4.9% | 5.32 | 4.95 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 77 | 35 | 200 | 875 | 199 | 74 | 43 | 45% | 2.6 | 22.7% | 8.5% | 14.3% | 4.9% | 5.32 | 4.95 | -0.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 38 IPFIP 4.12 → 5.13 (+1.01)K% 25.3% → 20.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.29% | — | ×0.810 | 20.48% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.47% | — | ×1.100 | 8.22% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.02% | ÷0.976 | ×1.200 | 4.95% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 4.12 → 5.13, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAARound Rock Express · 4 IPFIP 5.84 → 6.41 (+0.56)K% 15.0% → 12.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.00% | — | ×0.860 | 12.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×0.900 | 9.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.00% | ÷0.928 | ×1.100 | 5.93% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 86).
Result: FIP 5.84 → 6.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 91 IPFIP 3.76 → 4.87 (+1.11)K% 26.3% → 21.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.29% | — | ×0.810 | 21.29% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.86% | — | ×1.100 | 8.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.44% | ÷0.915 | ×1.200 | 4.51% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 3.76 → 4.87, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Hickory Crawdads · 85 IPFIP 3.58 → 5.42 (+1.84)K% 34.5% → 26.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.54% | — | ×0.770 | 26.60% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.52% | — | ×1.150 | 8.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.46% | ÷0.881 | ×1.250 | 6.32% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 3.58 → 5.42, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKACL White Sox · 13 IPFIP 1.53 → 2.46 (+0.93)K% 27.5% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.45% | — | ×0.680 | 18.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.88% | — | ×1.250 | 7.35% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.53 → 2.46, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).