Jacob Steinmetz
P Hillsboro Hops| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 20 | AARI | 19 | 16 | 73 | 6.19 | 4.64 | 18.5% | 13.1% | — | K 13.7% · BB 15.5% · FIP 5.61 |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 23 | 23 | 108 | 4.01 | 2.87 | 23.8% | 8.6% | — | K 18.0% · BB 10.1% · FIP 3.79 |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX3 levels | 12 | 11 | 35 | 2.55 | 3.13 | 33.3% | 16.7% | — | K 24.2% · BB 18.1% · FIP 4.12 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBARI | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.97 | 4.97 | 21.5% | 13.8% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 25 | MLBARI | 5 | 5 | 31 | 4.72 | 4.66 | 21.9% | 12.3% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ51% MLB | 26 | MLBARI | 8 | 8 | 48 | 4.63 | 4.60 | 22.1% | 12.0% | 0.4 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | ACL D-backs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 1.3 | 0.0% | 40.0% | -40.0% | 0.0% | 6.75 | 8.17 | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK RAW | ACL D-backs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100% | 1.3 | 0.0% | 40.0% | -40.0% | 0.0% | 6.75 | 12.10 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL D-backs Red | 11 | 7 | 24 | 117 | 27 | 20 | 1 | 64% | 2.2 | 15.7% | 21.4% | -5.7% | 1.1% | 7.88 | 5.07 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK RAW | ACL D-backs Red | 11 | 7 | 24 | 117 | 27 | 20 | 1 | 64% | 2.2 | 23.1% | 17.1% | 6.0% | 0.9% | 7.88 | 3.89 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A MLE | Visalia Rawhide | 19 | 16 | 73 | 335 | 62 | 44 | 8 | 84% | 3.8 | 13.7% | 15.5% | -1.8% | 3.1% | 6.19 | 5.61 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | A RAW | Visalia Rawhide | 19 | 16 | 73 | 335 | 62 | 44 | 8 | 84% | 3.8 | 18.5% | 13.1% | 5.4% | 2.4% | 6.19 | 4.64 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 108 | 474 | 113 | 41 | 6 | 100% | 4.7 | 18.0% | 10.1% | 7.9% | 1.7% | 4.01 | 3.79 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 108 | 474 | 113 | 41 | 6 | 100% | 4.7 | 18.0% | 10.1% | 7.9% | 1.7% | 4.01 | 3.79 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 23 | 108 | 474 | 113 | 41 | 6 | 100% | 4.7 | 23.8% | 8.6% | 15.2% | 1.3% | 4.01 | 2.87 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 12 | 11 | 35 | 150 | 50 | 25 | 2 | 92% | 2.9 | 24.2% | 18.1% | 6.1% | 1.4% | 2.55 | 4.12 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 12 | 11 | 35 | 150 | 50 | 25 | 2 | 92% | 2.9 | 24.2% | 18.1% | 6.1% | 1.4% | 2.55 | 4.12 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 12 | 11 | 35 | 150 | 50 | 25 | 2 | 92% | 2.9 | 33.3% | 16.7% | 16.7% | 1.3% | 2.55 | 3.13 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | ARI | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100% | 1.0 | 21.5% | 13.8% | 7.7% | 2.8% | 4.97 | 4.97 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | ARI | 18 | 18 | 102 | 432 | 95 | 53 | 12 | 100% | 5.7 | 21.9% | 12.3% | 9.5% | 2.8% | 4.81 | 4.75 | +0.8 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | ARI | 16 | 16 | 94 | 395 | 87 | 47 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.1% | 12.0% | 10.1% | 2.8% | 4.72 | 4.69 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | ARI | 15 | 15 | 89 | 375 | 83 | 44 | 11 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.1% | 11.8% | 10.3% | 2.9% | 4.70 | 4.71 | +0.7 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | ARI | 14 | 14 | 84 | 354 | 78 | 42 | 11 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.9% | 11.9% | 10.1% | 3.0% | 4.74 | 4.78 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | ARI | 13 | 13 | 78 | 328 | 71 | 40 | 10 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.7% | 12.1% | 9.6% | 3.2% | 4.84 | 4.91 | +0.4 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | ARI | 12 | 12 | 70 | 297 | 63 | 37 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.4% | 12.4% | 9.0% | 3.4% | 4.99 | 5.09 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | ARI | 5 | 5 | 31 | 131 | 29 | 16 | 4 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.9% | 12.3% | 9.5% | 2.7% | 4.72 | 4.66 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | ARI | 8 | 8 | 48 | 203 | 45 | 24 | 5 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.1% | 12.0% | 10.1% | 2.7% | 4.63 | 4.60 | +0.4 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | ARI | 9 | 9 | 56 | 236 | 52 | 28 | 6 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.1% | 11.8% | 10.3% | 2.7% | 4.61 | 4.62 | +0.4 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | ARI | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 56 | 30 | 7 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.9% | 11.9% | 10.1% | 2.8% | 4.65 | 4.69 | +0.4 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | ARI | 10 | 10 | 60 | 253 | 55 | 31 | 8 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.7% | 12.1% | 9.6% | 3.0% | 4.74 | 4.81 | +0.3 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | ARI | 10 | 10 | 57 | 241 | 51 | 30 | 8 | 100% | 5.7 | 21.4% | 12.4% | 9.0% | 3.2% | 4.89 | 4.99 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 52 | 52 | 312 | 1319 | 288 | 159 | 38 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.8% | 12.1% | 9.8% | 2.9% | 4.71 | 4.36 | +3.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 33 | 200 | 844 | 184 | 102 | 24 | 100% | 6.0 | 21.8% | 12.1% | 9.8% | 2.9% | 4.71 | 4.36 | +2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 66 | 58 | 241 | 1086 | 186 | 156 | 22 | 88% | 3.7 | 17.1% | 14.3% | 2.8% | 2.0% | 4.85 | 4.57 | +3.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 55 | 48 | 200 | 901 | 154 | 129 | 18 | 88% | 3.7 | 17.1% | 14.3% | 2.8% | 2.0% | 4.85 | 4.57 | +1.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Hillsboro Hops · 21 IPFIP 3.05 → 4.12 (+1.06)K% 31.5% → 24.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.46% | — | ×0.770 | 24.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.73% | — | ×1.150 | 18.09% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.12% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 1.40% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.05 → 4.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AVisalia Rawhide · 9 IPFIP 2.77 → 3.88 (+1.11)K% 31.6% → 23.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.58% | — | ×0.740 | 23.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.42% | — | ×1.180 | 21.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.77 → 3.88, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 ROKACL D-backs · 5 IPFIP 4.02 → 6.70 (+2.68)K% 43.5% → 29.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 43.48% | — | ×0.680 | 29.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.39% | — | ×1.250 | 21.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.35% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 6.09% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.02 → 6.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Hillsboro Hops · 58 IPFIP 3.36 → 4.30 (+0.94)K% 20.7% → 15.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.69% | — | ×0.770 | 15.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.20% | — | ×1.150 | 10.57% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.53% | ÷0.875 | ×1.250 | 2.19% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 75).
Result: FIP 3.36 → 4.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AVisalia Rawhide · 50 IPFIP 2.29 → 3.17 (+0.88)K% 27.7% → 20.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.70% | — | ×0.740 | 20.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.98% | — | ×1.180 | 9.42% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.94% | ÷1.102 | ×1.300 | 1.11% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 120).
Result: FIP 2.29 → 3.17, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AVisalia Rawhide · 73 IPFIP 4.51 → 5.61 (+1.09)K% 18.5% → 13.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.51% | — | ×0.740 | 13.70% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.13% | — | ×1.180 | 15.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.39% | ÷1.003 | ×1.300 | 3.10% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).
Result: FIP 4.51 → 5.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKACL D-backs Red · 24 IPFIP 3.79 → 5.07 (+1.28)K% 23.1% → 15.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.08% | — | ×0.680 | 15.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.09% | — | ×1.250 | 21.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.85% | ÷1.119 | ×1.400 | 1.07% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 124).
Result: FIP 3.79 → 5.07, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.2 | 92 | 21.8% | 12.4% | 1.15 | 4.83 |
| David West ('88-'98, 1 WAR*) | 2.8 | 71 | 22.1%* | 12.1%* | 1.28* | 4.79* |
| Gerry Arrigo ('61-'70, 1 WAR*) | 3.1 | 103 | 20.0%* | 11.6%* | 1.17* | 4.98* |
| Mike Kilkenny ('69-'73, 0 WAR*) | 2.0 | 102 | 22.2%* | 11.4%* | 1.11* | 5.16* |
| Jonathan Sánchez ('13) | 3.9 | 112 | 22.8% | 12.5% | 1.04 | 4.70 |
| Rob Tejeda ('05-'11, 3 WAR*) | 2.2 | 74 | 21.8%* | 12.6%* | 1.00* | 4.23* |
| Robinson Tejeda ('11) | 2.2 | 74 | 19.1% | 12.6% | 0.96 | 4.42 |