Yordanny Monegro
P Greenville Drive| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21 | MIX2 levels | 18 | 17 | 76 | 2.84 | 2.97 | 30.7% | 9.5% | — | K 23.7% · BB 11.2% · FIP 4.25 |
| 2025 | 22 | AABOS | 9 | 8 | 34 | 2.67 | 2.06 | 35.8% | 5.8% | — | K 29.0% · BB 6.4% · FIP 2.76 |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4.05 | 7.30 | 26.7% | 20.0% | — | K 26.7% · BB 20.0% · FIP 7.04 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBBOS | — | — | 0 | 3.94 | 3.94 | 27.1% | 8.9% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 25 | MLBBOS | 4 | 4 | 25 | 3.90 | 3.88 | 27.1% | 8.8% | 0.4 | |
| 2029PROJ66% MLB | 26 | MLBBOS | 6 | 6 | 38 | 3.91 | 3.89 | 27.0% | 8.8% | 0.7 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL BOS Blue | 13 | 13 | 40 | 172 | 41 | 25 | 0 | 100% | 3.1 | 16.2% | 18.2% | -2.0% | 0.0% | 3.63 | 4.03 | — |
| 2021 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL BOS Blue | 13 | 13 | 40 | 172 | 41 | 25 | 0 | 100% | 3.1 | 23.8% | 14.5% | 9.3% | 0.0% | 3.63 | 2.92 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Red Sox | 9 | 6 | 26 | 122 | 24 | 14 | 7 | 67% | 2.9 | 13.4% | 14.3% | -1.0% | 8.5% | 7.36 | 8.46 | — |
| 2022 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Red Sox | 9 | 6 | 26 | 122 | 24 | 14 | 7 | 67% | 2.9 | 19.7% | 11.5% | 8.2% | 5.7% | 7.36 | 6.41 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 14 | 13 | 66 | 269 | 93 | 26 | 1 | 93% | 4.7 | 25.4% | 11.0% | 14.4% | 0.0% | 2.06 | 2.34 | — |
| 2023 | 20 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 14 | 13 | 66 | 269 | 93 | 26 | 1 | 93% | 4.7 | 34.6% | 9.7% | 24.9% | 0.4% | 2.06 | 1.65 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 18 | 17 | 76 | 306 | 94 | 29 | 7 | 94% | 4.2 | 23.7% | 11.2% | 12.5% | 3.2% | 2.84 | 4.25 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 18 | 17 | 76 | 306 | 94 | 29 | 7 | 94% | 4.2 | 23.7% | 11.2% | 12.5% | 3.2% | 2.84 | 4.25 | — |
| 2024 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 18 | 17 | 76 | 306 | 94 | 29 | 7 | 94% | 4.2 | 30.7% | 9.5% | 21.2% | 2.3% | 2.84 | 2.97 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | AA MLE | Portland Sea Dogs | 9 | 8 | 34 | 137 | 49 | 8 | 3 | 89% | 3.7 | 29.0% | 6.4% | 22.5% | 2.3% | 2.67 | 2.76 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | AA MLE | Portland Sea Dogs | 9 | 8 | 34 | 137 | 49 | 8 | 3 | 89% | 3.7 | 29.0% | 6.4% | 22.5% | 2.3% | 2.67 | 2.76 | — |
| 2025 | 22 | AA RAW | Portland Sea Dogs | 9 | 8 | 34 | 137 | 49 | 8 | 3 | 89% | 3.7 | 35.8% | 5.8% | 29.9% | 2.2% | 2.67 | 2.06 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 3 | 3 | 7 | 30 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 100% | 2.2 | 26.7% | 20.0% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 4.05 | 7.04 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 3 | 3 | 7 | 30 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 100% | 2.2 | 26.7% | 20.0% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 4.05 | 7.04 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 3 | 3 | 7 | 30 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 100% | 2.2 | 26.7% | 20.0% | 6.7% | 6.7% | 4.05 | 7.30 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | BOS | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27.1% | 8.9% | 18.2% | 3.0% | 3.94 | 3.94 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | BOS | 10 | 10 | 58 | 244 | 66 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 27.1% | 8.8% | 18.3% | 2.9% | 3.94 | 3.92 | +1.0 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | BOS | 10 | 10 | 58 | 244 | 66 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 5.8 | 27.0% | 8.8% | 18.2% | 2.9% | 3.95 | 3.93 | +1.0 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | BOS | 4 | 4 | 25 | 106 | 29 | 9 | 3 | 100% | 6.2 | 27.1% | 8.8% | 18.3% | 2.9% | 3.90 | 3.88 | +0.4 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | BOS | 6 | 6 | 38 | 160 | 43 | 14 | 5 | 100% | 6.3 | 27.0% | 8.8% | 18.2% | 2.9% | 3.91 | 3.89 | +0.7 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 11 | 11 | 63 | 267 | 72 | 23 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 27.1% | 8.8% | 18.3% | 2.9% | 3.91 | 3.50 | +1.5 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 34 | 34 | 200 | 844 | 228 | 73 | 25 | 100% | 5.9 | 27.1% | 8.8% | 18.3% | 2.9% | 3.91 | 3.50 | +4.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 66 | 60 | 247 | 1036 | 233 | 128 | 25 | 91% | 3.7 | 22.5% | 12.3% | 10.2% | 2.4% | 3.24 | 4.10 | +2.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 53 | 49 | 200 | 838 | 188 | 103 | 20 | 91% | 3.7 | 22.5% | 12.3% | 10.2% | 2.4% | 3.24 | 4.10 | +3.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 34 IPFIP 2.02 → 2.76 (+0.73)K% 35.8% → 29.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.77% | — | ×0.810 | 28.97% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.84% | — | ×1.100 | 6.42% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.19% | ÷1.119 | ×1.200 | 2.35% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 124).
Result: FIP 2.02 → 2.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Greenville Drive · 66 IPFIP 3.18 → 4.25 (+1.07)K% 30.8% → 23.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.83% | — | ×0.770 | 23.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.77% | — | ×1.150 | 11.24% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.63% | ÷1.043 | ×1.250 | 3.15% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 109).
Result: FIP 3.18 → 4.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Red Sox · 10 IPFIP 1.52 → 2.56 (+1.05)K% 30.0% → 20.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.00% | — | ×0.680 | 20.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.50% | — | ×1.250 | 9.38% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.952 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 90).
Result: FIP 1.52 → 2.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ASalem Red Sox · 41 IPFIP 1.43 → 2.41 (+0.98)K% 34.5% → 25.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.48% | — | ×0.740 | 25.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.77% | — | ×1.180 | 11.53% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.999 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.43 → 2.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Red Sox · 15 IPFIP 0.91 → 2.15 (+1.24)K% 37.0% → 25.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.04% | — | ×0.680 | 25.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.41% | — | ×1.250 | 9.26% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.974 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 0.91 → 2.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+Greenville Drive · 10 IPFIP 3.31 → 4.61 (+1.31)K% 31.7% → 24.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 31.71% | — | ×0.770 | 24.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.20% | — | ×1.150 | 14.02% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.44% | ÷0.931 | ×1.250 | 3.28% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 86).
Result: FIP 3.31 → 4.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Red Sox · 26 IPFIP 6.04 → 8.46 (+2.42)K% 19.7% → 13.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.67% | — | ×0.680 | 13.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.48% | — | ×1.250 | 14.34% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.74% | ÷0.943 | ×1.400 | 8.52% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 89).
Result: FIP 6.04 → 8.46, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 ROKDSL BOS Blue · 40 IPFIP 2.93 → 4.03 (+1.10)K% 23.8% → 16.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.84% | — | ×0.680 | 16.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.53% | — | ×1.250 | 18.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.458 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 192).
Result: FIP 2.93 → 4.03, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.9 | 58 | 27.1% | 8.8% | 1.14 | 3.94 |
| Danny Farquhar ('18) | 1.4 | 54 | 26.9% | 9.2% | 0.99 | 3.93 |
| Buddy Schultz ('75-'79, 2 WAR*) | 1.2 | 60 | 27.4%* | 8.5%* | 1.21* | 4.14* |
| Oliver Drake ('20) | 1.0 | 68 | 26.2% | 9.5% | 1.06 | 4.27 |
| Charlie Furbush ('15) | 1.3 | 52 | 24.5% | 8.1% | 1.04 | 3.97 |
| Bob James ('78-'87, 4 WAR*) | 2.0 | 68 | 26.3%* | 8.8%* | 1.07* | 4.04* |
| Mike Schooler ('88-'93, 5 WAR*) | 1.5 | 49 | 26.9%* | 8.0%* | 0.96* | 3.68* |