Drew Rasmussen
P Tampa Bay Rays| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29 | MIX2 levels | 21 | 6 | 36 | 4.00 | 1.93 | 28.9% | 4.0% | 1.2 | K 30.2% · BB 5.2% · FIP 1.21 |
| 2025 | 30 | MLBTB | 31 | 31 | 150 | 2.76 | 3.69 | 21.7% | 6.2% | 3.1 | |
| 2026 | 31 | MLBTB | 30 | 30 | 172 | 2.67 | 2.69 | 26.0% | 4.8% | 5.9 | |
| 2027PROJ | 32 | MLBTB | 21 | 21 | 126 | 3.29 | 3.38 | 25.2% | 5.3% | 3.1 | |
| 2028PROJ | 33 | MLBTB | 18 | 18 | 111 | 3.47 | 3.62 | 24.4% | 5.7% | 2.3 | |
| 2029PROJ | 34 | MLBTB | 16 | 16 | 94 | 3.73 | 3.92 | 23.5% | 6.2% | 1.6 |
Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 27 | 23 | 74 | 303 | 96 | 31 | 4 | 85% | 2.8 | 24.6% | 12.6% | 12.0% | 1.9% | 3.15 | 3.64 | — |
| 2019 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 27 | 23 | 74 | 303 | 96 | 31 | 4 | 85% | 2.8 | 31.7% | 10.2% | 21.5% | 1.3% | 3.15 | 2.47 | — |
| 2020 | 25 | MLB MLE | Milwaukee Brewers | 12 | 0 | 15 | 71 | 21 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 1.3 | 29.6% | 12.7% | 16.9% | 4.0% | 5.87 | 4.42 | +0.0 |
| 2020 | 25 | MLB RAW | Milwaukee Brewers | 12 | 0 | 15 | 71 | 21 | 9 | 3 | 0% | 1.3 | 29.6% | 12.7% | 16.9% | 4.2% | 5.87 | 4.67 | -0.0 |
| 2021 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 11 | 87 | 349 | 96 | 25 | 5 | 26% | 2.0 | 23.8% | 7.5% | 16.3% | 1.7% | 2.47 | 2.96 | +1.7 |
| 2021 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 43 | 11 | 87 | 349 | 96 | 25 | 5 | 26% | 2.0 | 27.5% | 7.2% | 20.3% | 1.4% | 2.47 | 2.50 | +2.2 |
| 2022 | 27 | MLB MLE | Tampa Bay Rays | 28 | 28 | 146 | 584 | 125 | 31 | 13 | 100% | 5.2 | 21.4% | 5.3% | 16.1% | 2.3% | 2.84 | 3.22 | +3.9 |
| 2022 | 27 | MLB RAW | Tampa Bay Rays | 28 | 28 | 146 | 584 | 125 | 31 | 13 | 100% | 5.2 | 21.4% | 5.3% | 16.1% | 2.2% | 2.84 | 3.18 | +4.0 |
| 2023 | 28 | MLB MLE | Tampa Bay Rays | 8 | 8 | 45 | 177 | 47 | 11 | 2 | 100% | 5.6 | 26.6% | 6.2% | 20.3% | 1.2% | 2.62 | 2.28 | +1.8 |
| 2023 | 28 | MLB RAW | Tampa Bay Rays | 8 | 8 | 45 | 177 | 47 | 11 | 2 | 100% | 5.6 | 26.6% | 6.2% | 20.3% | 1.1% | 2.62 | 2.32 | +1.8 |
| 2024 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 6 | 36 | 149 | 43 | 6 | 2 | 29% | 1.7 | 30.2% | 5.2% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 4.00 | 1.21 | +1.5 |
| 2024 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 6 | 36 | 149 | 43 | 6 | 2 | 29% | 1.7 | 30.2% | 5.2% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 4.00 | 1.21 | +1.5 |
| 2024 | 29 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 6 | 36 | 149 | 43 | 6 | 2 | 29% | 1.7 | 28.9% | 4.0% | 24.8% | 1.3% | 4.00 | 1.93 | +1.2 |
| 2025 | 30 | MLB MLE | Tampa Bay Rays | 31 | 31 | 150 | 585 | 127 | 36 | 18 | 100% | 4.8 | 21.7% | 6.2% | 15.6% | 3.0% | 2.76 | 3.69 | +3.1 |
| 2025 | 30 | MLB MLE | Tampa Bay Rays | 31 | 31 | 150 | 585 | 127 | 36 | 18 | 100% | 4.8 | 21.7% | 6.2% | 15.6% | 3.0% | 2.76 | 3.69 | +3.1 |
| 2025 | 30 | MLB RAW | Tampa Bay Rays | 31 | 31 | 150 | 585 | 127 | 36 | 18 | 100% | 4.8 | 21.7% | 6.2% | 15.6% | 3.1% | 2.76 | 3.69 | +3.1 |
| 2026 | 31 | MLB MLE | Tampa Bay Rays | 30 | 30 | 172 | 669 | 174 | 32 | 14 | 100% | 5.7 | 26.0% | 4.8% | 21.2% | 2.2% | 2.67 | 2.69 | +6.0 |
| 2026 | 31 | MLB MLE | Tampa Bay Rays | 30 | 30 | 172 | 669 | 174 | 32 | 14 | 100% | 5.7 | 26.0% | 4.8% | 21.2% | 2.2% | 2.67 | 2.69 | +6.0 |
| 2026 | 31 | MLB RAW | Tampa Bay Rays | 30 | 30 | 172 | 669 | 174 | 32 | 14 | 100% | 5.7 | 26.0% | 4.8% | 21.2% | 2.1% | 2.67 | 2.69 | +5.9 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 160 | 111 | 633 | 2509 | 602 | 148 | 55 | 69% | 4.0 | 24.0% | 5.9% | 18.1% | 2.2% | 2.83 | 3.03 | +18.5 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 32 | MLB | TB | 21 | 21 | 126 | 532 | 134 | 28 | 13 | 100% | 6.0 | 25.2% | 5.3% | 20.0% | 2.5% | 3.29 | 3.38 | +3.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 33 | MLB MLE | TB | 18 | 18 | 111 | 469 | 114 | 27 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.4% | 5.7% | 18.7% | 2.8% | 3.51 | 3.66 | +2.3 |
| 2029 | 34 | MLB MLE | TB | 16 | 16 | 94 | 397 | 93 | 25 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.5% | 6.2% | 17.3% | 3.1% | 3.78 | 3.97 | +1.6 |
| 2030 | 35 | MLB MLE | TB | 12 | 12 | 74 | 313 | 71 | 21 | 11 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.5% | 6.8% | 15.8% | 3.4% | 4.09 | 4.30 | +1.0 |
| 2031 | 36 | MLB MLE | TB | 9 | 9 | 52 | 220 | 47 | 16 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.5% | 7.4% | 14.1% | 3.8% | 4.44 | 4.67 | +0.4 |
| 2028 | 33 | MLB CTX | TB | 18 | 18 | 111 | 469 | 114 | 27 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.4% | 5.7% | 18.7% | 2.7% | 3.47 | 3.62 | +2.3 |
| 2029 | 34 | MLB CTX | TB | 16 | 16 | 94 | 397 | 93 | 25 | 12 | 100% | 5.9 | 23.5% | 6.2% | 17.3% | 3.0% | 3.73 | 3.92 | +1.6 |
| 2030 | 35 | MLB CTX | TB | 12 | 12 | 74 | 312 | 70 | 21 | 10 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.5% | 6.8% | 15.8% | 3.3% | 4.04 | 4.25 | +1.0 |
| 2031 | 36 | MLB CTX | TB | 9 | 9 | 52 | 220 | 47 | 16 | 8 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.5% | 7.4% | 14.1% | 3.7% | 4.38 | 4.61 | +0.4 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 215 | 166 | 964 | 3908 | 928 | 237 | 98 | 77% | 4.5 | 23.7% | 6.1% | 17.7% | 2.5% | 3.17 | 3.24 | +25.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 45 | 34 | 200 | 811 | 193 | 49 | 20 | 77% | 4.5 | 23.7% | 6.1% | 17.7% | 2.5% | 3.17 | 3.24 | +5.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 200 | 137 | 726 | 2887 | 696 | 191 | 62 | 68% | 3.6 | 24.1% | 6.6% | 17.5% | 2.1% | 2.88 | 3.07 | +23.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 55 | 38 | 200 | 796 | 192 | 53 | 17 | 68% | 3.6 | 24.1% | 6.6% | 17.5% | 2.1% | 2.88 | 3.07 | +4.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAADurham Bulls · 7 IPFIP 4.38 → 4.79 (+0.41)K% 24.2% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.24% | — | ×0.860 | 20.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×0.900 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 6.06% | ÷1.061 | ×1.100 | 6.28% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP 4.38 → 4.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAADurham Bulls · 11 IPFIP -0.92 → -0.34 (+0.59)K% 54.8% → 48.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 54.76% | — | ×0.880 | 48.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.76% | — | ×1.050 | 5.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.059 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 112).
Result: FIP -0.92 → -0.34, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AABiloxi Shuckers · 61 IPFIP 2.85 → 3.64 (+0.79)K% 30.3% → 24.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.31% | — | ×0.810 | 24.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.42% | — | ×1.100 | 12.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.57% | ÷1.018 | ×1.200 | 1.86% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 2.85 → 3.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Carolina Mudcats · 11 IPFIP 0.55 → 1.36 (+0.81)K% 37.2% → 28.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.21% | — | ×0.770 | 28.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.65% | — | ×1.150 | 5.35% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.082 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 0.55 → 1.36, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 5.4 | 99 | 23.9% | 6.0% | 0.98 | 3.20 |
| Julio Urías ('23) | 3.6 | 102 | 24.3% | 6.6% | 1.05 | 3.11 |
| Alejandro Peña ('81-'96, 15 WAR*) | 5.3 | 81 | 24.7%* | 7.5%* | 0.96* | 3.61* |
| Keith Foulke ('08) | 3.9 | 72 | 22.4% | 6.1% | 1.08 | 3.33 |
| Kris Medlen ('18) | 3.0 | 100 | 20.1% | 6.6% | 0.75 | 3.33 |
| Bruce Sutter ('76-'88, 22 WAR*) | 5.2 | 95 | 28.5%* | 7.3%* | 1.12* | 3.14* |
| Jeff Montgomery ('87-'99, 19 WAR*) | 4.3 | 72 | 26.2%* | 7.6%* | 1.01* | 3.16* |