Daniel McCutchen
P El Paso Chihuahuas| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 31 | MLBTEX | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7.71 | 11.24 | 0.0% | 14.3% | -0.2 | ||
| 2015 | 32 | AAASD | 32 | 22 | 132 | 3.60 | 3.80 | 15.8% | 4.2% | — | K 13.9% · BB 4.4% · FIP 4.30 | |
| 2016 | 33 | MIX2 levels | 29 | 28 | 155 | 6.23 | 4.66 | 12.4% | 5.6% | — | K 10.8% · BB 5.9% · FIP 4.74 | |
| 2017 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2018 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2020 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 38 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 39 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 40 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 41 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 42 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 43 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 26 | MLB MLE | Pittsburgh Pirates | 6 | 6 | 36 | 155 | 19 | 9 | 6 | 100% | 6.1 | 12.3% | 5.8% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 4.21 | 4.93 | +0.2 |
| 2009 | 26 | MLB RAW | Pittsburgh Pirates | 6 | 6 | 36 | 155 | 19 | 9 | 6 | 100% | 6.1 | 12.3% | 5.8% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 4.21 | 4.94 | +0.2 |
| 2010 | 27 | MLB MLE | Pittsburgh Pirates | 28 | 9 | 68 | 316 | 38 | 28 | 13 | 32% | 2.4 | 12.0% | 8.9% | 3.2% | 4.4% | 6.12 | 5.65 | -0.9 |
| 2010 | 27 | MLB RAW | Pittsburgh Pirates | 28 | 9 | 68 | 316 | 38 | 28 | 13 | 32% | 2.4 | 12.0% | 8.9% | 3.2% | 4.1% | 6.12 | 5.72 | -0.9 |
| 2011 | 28 | MLB MLE | Pittsburgh Pirates | 73 | 0 | 85 | 364 | 47 | 28 | 7 | 0% | 1.2 | 12.9% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 2.1% | 3.72 | 4.13 | +0.4 |
| 2011 | 28 | MLB RAW | Pittsburgh Pirates | 73 | 0 | 85 | 364 | 47 | 28 | 7 | 0% | 1.2 | 12.9% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 1.9% | 3.72 | 4.06 | +0.5 |
| 2012 | 29 | MLB MLE | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0% | — | 0.0% | 50.0% | -50.0% | 50.0% | — | 36.88 | — |
| 2012 | 29 | MLB RAW | Pittsburgh Pirates | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0% | — | 0.0% | 50.0% | -50.0% | 50.0% | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 31 | MLB MLE | Texas Rangers | 1 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0% | 14.3% | -14.3% | 7.1% | 7.71 | 8.83 | -0.1 |
| 2014 | 31 | MLB RAW | Texas Rangers | 1 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 2.3 | 0.0% | 14.3% | -14.3% | 7.1% | 7.71 | 11.24 | -0.2 |
| 2015 | 32 | AAA MLE | El Paso Chihuahuas | 32 | 22 | 132 | 545 | 86 | 23 | 15 | 69% | 4.1 | 13.9% | 4.4% | 9.5% | 3.3% | 3.60 | 4.30 | — |
| 2015 | 32 | AAA RAW | El Paso Chihuahuas | 32 | 22 | 132 | 545 | 86 | 23 | 15 | 69% | 4.1 | 15.8% | 4.2% | 11.6% | 2.8% | 3.60 | 3.80 | — |
| 2016 | 33 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 29 | 28 | 155 | 702 | 87 | 39 | 23 | 97% | 5.3 | 10.8% | 5.9% | 4.9% | 3.3% | 6.23 | 4.74 | — |
| 2016 | 33 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 29 | 28 | 155 | 702 | 87 | 39 | 23 | 97% | 5.3 | 12.4% | 5.6% | 6.8% | 3.3% | 6.23 | 4.66 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 109 | 15 | 191 | 851 | 104 | 68 | 28 | 14% | 1.8 | 12.2% | 8.0% | 4.2% | 3.3% | 4.81 | 4.98 | -1.0 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 109 | 15 | 191 | 851 | 104 | 68 | 28 | 14% | 1.8 | 12.2% | 8.0% | 4.2% | 3.3% | 4.81 | 4.89 | -0.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 114 | 16 | 200 | 891 | 109 | 71 | 29 | 14% | 1.8 | 12.2% | 8.0% | 4.2% | 3.3% | 4.81 | 4.89 | -0.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 169 | 65 | 478 | 2096 | 255 | 132 | 70 | 38% | 2.8 | 12.2% | 6.3% | 5.9% | 3.3% | 4.90 | 4.70 | -1.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 71 | 27 | 200 | 877 | 107 | 55 | 29 | 38% | 2.8 | 12.2% | 6.3% | 5.9% | 3.3% | 4.90 | 4.70 | -1.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2016 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 135 IPFIP 4.46 → 4.54 (+0.07)K% 12.3% → 10.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.28% | — | ×0.880 | 10.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.65% | — | ×1.050 | 5.94% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.07% | ÷1.160 | ×1.100 | 2.91% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 132).
Result: FIP 4.46 → 4.54, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AASan Antonio Missions · 20 IPFIP 5.24 → 6.27 (+1.03)K% 13.3% → 10.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.25% | — | ×0.810 | 10.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.82% | — | ×1.100 | 5.30% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.82% | ÷0.933 | ×1.200 | 6.20% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 5.24 → 6.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 132 IPFIP 3.81 → 4.30 (+0.48)K% 15.8% → 13.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.78% | — | ×0.880 | 13.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.22% | — | ×1.050 | 4.43% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.75% | ÷0.919 | ×1.100 | 3.30% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 3.81 → 4.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).