Cole Sands
P Minnesota Twins| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27 | MLBMIN | 62 | 0 | 71 | 3.28 | 2.31 | 29.1% | 4.1% | 1.9 | |
| 2025 | 28 | MLBMIN | 69 | 3 | 72 | 4.50 | 3.29 | 21.4% | 5.7% | 1.1 | |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX3 levels | 20 | 0 | 20 | 4.95 | 4.25 | 23.5% | 9.4% | 0.1 | K 19.6% · BB 8.9% · FIP 5.50 |
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBMIN | 30 | 0 | 31 | 4.00 | 3.96 | 22.5% | 5.6% | 0.2 | |
| 2028PROJ95% MLB | 31 | MLBMIN | 35 | 0 | 37 | 4.11 | 4.19 | 21.8% | 5.9% | 0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ95% MLB | 32 | MLBMIN | 26 | 0 | 27 | 4.31 | 4.44 | 21.0% | 6.3% | 0.0 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 22 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 18 | 18 | 97 | 383 | 108 | 19 | 4 | 100% | 5.4 | 21.1% | 5.7% | 15.3% | 1.0% | 2.68 | 2.60 | — |
| 2019 | 22 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 18 | 18 | 97 | 383 | 108 | 19 | 4 | 100% | 5.4 | 28.2% | 5.0% | 23.2% | 1.0% | 2.68 | 2.00 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | AA MLE | Wichita Wind Surge | 19 | 18 | 80 | 334 | 96 | 35 | 6 | 95% | 4.2 | 23.3% | 11.5% | 11.8% | 2.0% | 2.46 | 3.67 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | AA RAW | Wichita Wind Surge | 19 | 18 | 80 | 334 | 96 | 35 | 6 | 95% | 4.2 | 28.7% | 10.5% | 18.3% | 1.8% | 2.46 | 2.99 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 30 | 16 | 92 | 429 | 100 | 37 | 13 | 53% | 3.1 | 21.3% | 8.9% | 12.4% | 3.5% | 5.65 | 4.38 | +1.1 |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 30 | 16 | 92 | 429 | 100 | 37 | 13 | 53% | 3.1 | 23.3% | 8.6% | 14.7% | 3.0% | 5.65 | 3.97 | +1.6 |
| 2023 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 52 | 217 | 62 | 23 | 6 | 0% | 1.5 | 25.9% | 10.1% | 15.8% | 2.8% | 2.41 | 3.75 | +0.5 |
| 2023 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 52 | 217 | 62 | 23 | 6 | 0% | 1.5 | 28.6% | 10.6% | 18.0% | 2.8% | 2.41 | 3.54 | +0.6 |
| 2024 | 27 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 62 | 0 | 71 | 292 | 85 | 12 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 29.1% | 4.1% | 25.0% | 2.0% | 3.28 | 2.28 | +1.9 |
| 2024 | 27 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 62 | 0 | 71 | 292 | 85 | 12 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 29.1% | 4.1% | 25.0% | 2.0% | 3.28 | 2.28 | +1.9 |
| 2024 | 27 | MLB RAW | Minnesota Twins | 62 | 0 | 71 | 292 | 85 | 12 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 29.1% | 4.1% | 25.0% | 2.1% | 3.28 | 2.31 | +1.9 |
| 2025 | 28 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 69 | 3 | 72 | 299 | 64 | 17 | 7 | 4% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 5.7% | 15.7% | 2.3% | 4.50 | 3.29 | +1.1 |
| 2025 | 28 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 69 | 3 | 72 | 299 | 64 | 17 | 7 | 4% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 5.7% | 15.7% | 2.3% | 4.50 | 3.29 | +1.1 |
| 2025 | 28 | MLB RAW | Minnesota Twins | 69 | 3 | 72 | 299 | 64 | 17 | 7 | 4% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 5.7% | 15.7% | 2.3% | 4.50 | 3.29 | +1.1 |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 20 | 0 | 20 | 85 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.6% | 8.9% | 10.7% | 5.3% | 4.95 | 5.50 | -0.2 |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 20 | 0 | 20 | 85 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 19.6% | 8.9% | 10.7% | 5.3% | 4.95 | 5.50 | -0.2 |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 20 | 0 | 20 | 85 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.5% | 9.4% | 14.1% | 3.5% | 4.95 | 4.25 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 170 | 6 | 208 | 890 | 209 | 60 | 24 | 4% | 1.2 | 23.5% | 6.7% | 16.7% | 2.7% | 4.42 | 3.46 | +2.7 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB | MIN | 30 | 0 | 31 | 131 | 29 | 7 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.5% | 5.6% | 16.9% | 3.0% | 4.00 | 3.96 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | MIN | 37 | 0 | 38 | 163 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.8% | 5.9% | 15.8% | 3.3% | 4.11 | 4.19 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 32 | MLB MLE | MIN | 27 | 0 | 29 | 122 | 25 | 8 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.0% | 6.3% | 14.6% | 3.5% | 4.31 | 4.44 | +0.0 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | MIN | 35 | 0 | 37 | 156 | 34 | 9 | 5 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.8% | 5.9% | 15.8% | 3.3% | 4.11 | 4.19 | +0.2 |
| 2029 | 32 | MLB CTX | MIN | 26 | 0 | 27 | 114 | 24 | 7 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.0% | 6.3% | 14.6% | 3.5% | 4.31 | 4.44 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 231 | 6 | 272 | 1160 | 267 | 76 | 33 | 3% | 1.2 | 23.0% | 6.6% | 16.4% | 2.9% | 4.37 | 3.56 | +3.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 170 | 4 | 200 | 854 | 197 | 56 | 24 | 3% | 1.2 | 23.0% | 6.6% | 16.4% | 2.9% | 4.37 | 3.56 | +2.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 252 | 55 | 486 | 2039 | 472 | 157 | 49 | 22% | 1.9 | 23.1% | 7.7% | 15.4% | 2.4% | 3.63 | 3.45 | +2.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 104 | 23 | 200 | 840 | 194 | 65 | 20 | 22% | 1.9 | 23.1% | 7.7% | 15.4% | 2.4% | 3.63 | 3.45 | +2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAASt. Paul Saints · 7 IPFIP 2.29 → 2.46 (+0.17)K% 26.9% → 23.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.92% | — | ×0.860 | 23.15% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.54% | — | ×0.900 | 10.38% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.29 → 2.46, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAASt. Paul Saints · 31 IPFIP 2.18 → 2.56 (+0.38)K% 34.5% → 29.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.45% | — | ×0.860 | 29.63% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.40% | — | ×0.900 | 7.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.68% | ÷1.009 | ×1.100 | 1.83% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 102).
Result: FIP 2.18 → 2.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAASt. Paul Saints · 62 IPFIP 3.77 → 4.51 (+0.74)K% 25.4% → 22.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.35% | — | ×0.880 | 22.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.45% | — | ×1.050 | 8.87% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.17% | ÷0.881 | ×1.100 | 3.95% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 3.77 → 4.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAWichita Wind Surge · 80 IPFIP 2.99 → 3.67 (+0.68)K% 28.7% → 23.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.74% | — | ×0.810 | 23.28% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.48% | — | ×1.100 | 11.53% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.80% | ÷1.104 | ×1.200 | 1.95% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).
Result: FIP 2.99 → 3.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Fort Myers Miracle · 52 IPFIP 2.37 → 2.89 (+0.51)K% 27.6% → 21.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.60% | — | ×0.770 | 21.26% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.65% | — | ×1.150 | 4.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.08% | ÷1.362 | ×1.250 | 1.91% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 172).
Result: FIP 2.37 → 2.89, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 41 IPFIP 1.52 → 2.29 (+0.76)K% 28.2% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.16% | — | ×0.740 | 20.84% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.32% | — | ×1.180 | 7.46% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.997 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 1.52 → 2.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 1.5 | 44 | 22.9% | 6.6% | 1.12 | 4.33 |
| Fernando Salas ('19) | 2.4 | 54 | 23.1% | 7.3% | 1.05 | 3.91 |
| Nick Wittgren ('23) | 1.6 | 41 | 21.6% | 7.0% | 1.15 | 4.04 |
| Charlie Furbush ('15) | 1.3 | 52 | 24.5% | 8.1% | 1.04 | 3.97 |
| Tim Crews ('87-'92, 3 WAR*) | 2.1 | 71 | 20.8%* | 6.2%* | 1.09* | 4.11* |
| Tony Castillo ('88-'98, 4 WAR*) | 2.6 | 59 | 18.5%* | 7.3%* | 0.98* | 3.76* |
| Donnie Moore ('75-'88, 7 WAR*) | 3.3 | 60 | 20.7%* | 6.6%* | 1.00* | 3.83* |