German Nunez
P ACL Rangers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22 | ROKDSL Rangers R… | 12 | 11 | 53 | 2.89 | 1.91 | 36.5% | 5.4% | — | K 24.8% · BB 6.8% · FIP 3.00 |
| 2025 | 23 | ROKTEX | 7 | 3 | 19 | 4.82 | 2.14 | 32.5% | 8.8% | — | K 22.1% · BB 10.9% · FIP 3.36 |
| 2027PROJ | 25 | MLBTEX | — | — | 0 | 4.29 | 4.29 | 23.4% | 9.1% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 26 | MLBTEX | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4.28 | 4.27 | 23.6% | 9.1% | 0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 20 | ROK MLE | DSL TEX Blue | 17 | 0 | 28 | 122 | 37 | 7 | 0 | 0% | 1.6 | 20.6% | 7.2% | 13.5% | 0.0% | 4.55 | 2.27 | — |
| 2022 | 20 | ROK RAW | DSL TEX Blue | 17 | 0 | 28 | 122 | 37 | 7 | 0 | 0% | 1.6 | 30.3% | 5.7% | 24.6% | 0.0% | 4.55 | 1.18 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK MLE | DSL Rangers Red | 11 | 10 | 51 | 213 | 65 | 22 | 3 | 91% | 4.7 | 20.8% | 12.9% | 7.8% | 1.9% | 3.16 | 4.01 | — |
| 2023 | 21 | ROK RAW | DSL Rangers Red | 11 | 10 | 51 | 213 | 65 | 22 | 3 | 91% | 4.7 | 30.5% | 10.3% | 20.2% | 1.4% | 3.16 | 2.61 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | ROK MLE | DSL Rangers Red | 12 | 11 | 53 | 203 | 74 | 11 | 4 | 92% | 4.4 | 24.8% | 6.8% | 18.0% | 2.1% | 2.89 | 3.00 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | ROK MLE | DSL Rangers Red | 12 | 11 | 53 | 203 | 74 | 11 | 4 | 92% | 4.4 | 24.8% | 6.8% | 18.0% | 2.1% | 2.89 | 3.00 | — |
| 2024 | 22 | ROK RAW | DSL Rangers Red | 12 | 11 | 53 | 203 | 74 | 11 | 4 | 92% | 4.4 | 36.5% | 5.4% | 31.0% | 2.0% | 2.89 | 1.91 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | ROK MLE | ACL Rangers | 7 | 3 | 19 | 80 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 43% | 2.7 | 22.1% | 10.9% | 11.2% | 1.3% | 4.82 | 3.36 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | ROK MLE | ACL Rangers | 7 | 3 | 19 | 80 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 43% | 2.7 | 22.1% | 10.9% | 11.2% | 1.3% | 4.82 | 3.36 | — |
| 2025 | 23 | ROK RAW | ACL Rangers | 7 | 3 | 19 | 80 | 26 | 7 | 1 | 43% | 2.7 | 32.5% | 8.8% | 23.8% | 1.2% | 4.82 | 2.14 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 25 | MLB | TEX | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.4% | 9.1% | 14.3% | 3.0% | 4.29 | 4.29 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 26 | MLB MLE | TEX | 3 | 3 | 20 | 84 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 100% | 6.7 | 23.6% | 9.1% | 14.5% | 3.0% | 4.28 | 4.27 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 26 | MLB CTX | TEX | 1 | 1 | 9 | 38 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 9.0 | 23.6% | 9.1% | 14.5% | 3.0% | 4.28 | 4.27 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 1 | 9 | 36 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 100% | 8.6 | 23.6% | 9.1% | 14.5% | 3.0% | 4.28 | 3.89 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 32 | 32 | 200 | 844 | 211 | 70 | 23 | 100% | 6.3 | 23.6% | 9.1% | 14.5% | 3.0% | 4.28 | 3.89 | +3.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 47 | 24 | 151 | 618 | 137 | 59 | 9 | 51% | 3.2 | 22.2% | 9.5% | 12.7% | 1.5% | 3.52 | 3.25 | +0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 62 | 32 | 200 | 820 | 182 | 78 | 12 | 51% | 3.2 | 22.2% | 9.5% | 12.7% | 1.5% | 3.52 | 3.25 | +2.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 ROKACL Rangers · 19 IPFIP 2.15 → 3.36 (+1.21)K% 32.5% → 22.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.50% | — | ×0.680 | 22.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.75% | — | ×1.250 | 10.94% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.25% | ÷1.302 | ×1.400 | 1.34% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 160).
Result: FIP 2.15 → 3.36, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKDSL Rangers Red · 53 IPFIP 1.79 → 3.00 (+1.21)K% 36.5% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.45% | — | ×0.680 | 24.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.42% | — | ×1.250 | 6.77% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.97% | ÷1.333 | ×1.400 | 2.07% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 167).
Result: FIP 1.79 → 3.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKDSL Rangers Red · 51 IPFIP 2.60 → 4.01 (+1.40)K% 30.5% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.52% | — | ×0.680 | 20.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.33% | — | ×1.250 | 12.91% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.41% | ÷1.056 | ×1.400 | 1.87% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 2.60 → 4.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL TEX Blue · 28 IPFIP 1.27 → 2.27 (+1.00)K% 30.3% → 20.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.33% | — | ×0.680 | 20.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.74% | — | ×1.250 | 7.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.148 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 130).
Result: FIP 1.27 → 2.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).