Troy Melton
P Detroit Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | AADET | 23 | 23 | 101 | 5.10 | 4.08 | 27.7% | 7.0% | — | K 22.4% · BB 7.7% · FIP 5.27 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX3 levels | 34 | 20 | 121 | 2.90 | 3.10 | 27.8% | 7.1% | 3.4 | K 24.5% · BB 7.2% · FIP 3.58 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX3 levels | 24 | 24 | 126 | 2.64 | 3.62 | 21.4% | 7.6% | 2.7 | K 20.0% · BB 7.9% · FIP 3.99 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBDET | 15 | 15 | 92 | 4.07 | 4.34 | 22.0% | 8.0% | 1.1 | |
| 2028PROJ95% MLB | 27 | MLBDET | 13 | 13 | 77 | 4.19 | 4.31 | 22.0% | 8.1% | 0.9 | |
| 2029PROJ95% MLB | 28 | MLBDET | 12 | 12 | 69 | 4.30 | 4.38 | 21.9% | 8.2% | 0.8 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 2 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2.5 | 29.4% | 0.0% | 29.4% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.62 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | 2 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2.5 | 29.4% | 0.0% | 29.4% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 1.10 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 23 | 22 | 92 | 377 | 94 | 24 | 5 | 96% | 4.0 | 18.9% | 7.4% | 11.6% | 1.6% | 2.74 | 3.31 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 23 | 22 | 92 | 377 | 94 | 24 | 5 | 96% | 4.0 | 24.9% | 6.4% | 18.6% | 1.3% | 2.74 | 2.55 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | 23 | 23 | 101 | 430 | 119 | 30 | 19 | 100% | 4.4 | 22.4% | 7.7% | 14.7% | 5.6% | 5.10 | 5.27 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | 23 | 23 | 101 | 430 | 119 | 30 | 19 | 100% | 4.4 | 22.4% | 7.7% | 14.7% | 5.6% | 5.10 | 5.27 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | AA RAW | Erie SeaWolves | 23 | 23 | 101 | 430 | 119 | 30 | 19 | 100% | 4.4 | 27.7% | 7.0% | 20.7% | 4.4% | 5.10 | 4.08 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 34 | 20 | 121 | 492 | 137 | 35 | 13 | 59% | 3.6 | 24.5% | 7.2% | 17.4% | 3.0% | 2.90 | 3.58 | +2.6 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 34 | 20 | 121 | 492 | 137 | 35 | 13 | 59% | 3.6 | 24.5% | 7.2% | 17.4% | 3.0% | 2.90 | 3.58 | +2.6 |
| 2025 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 34 | 20 | 121 | 492 | 137 | 35 | 13 | 59% | 3.6 | 27.8% | 7.1% | 20.7% | 2.6% | 2.90 | 3.10 | +3.4 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 24 | 126 | 515 | 110 | 39 | 13 | 100% | 5.2 | 20.0% | 7.9% | 12.1% | 2.9% | 2.64 | 3.99 | +2.1 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 24 | 126 | 515 | 110 | 39 | 13 | 100% | 5.2 | 20.0% | 7.9% | 12.1% | 2.9% | 2.64 | 3.99 | +2.1 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 24 | 24 | 126 | 515 | 110 | 39 | 13 | 100% | 5.2 | 21.4% | 7.6% | 13.8% | 2.5% | 2.64 | 3.62 | +2.7 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 36 | 24 | 160 | 650 | 130 | 52 | 20 | 67% | 4.4 | 20.0% | 8.0% | 12.0% | 3.1% | 2.76 | 4.08 | +2.5 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | DET | 15 | 15 | 92 | 388 | 85 | 31 | 12 | 100% | 6.1 | 22.0% | 8.0% | 14.0% | 3.1% | 4.07 | 4.34 | +1.1 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 14 | 14 | 81 | 343 | 75 | 28 | 11 | 100% | 5.8 | 22.0% | 8.1% | 13.9% | 3.1% | 4.26 | 4.38 | +1.0 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB MLE | DET | 12 | 12 | 73 | 307 | 67 | 25 | 10 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.9% | 8.2% | 13.6% | 3.2% | 4.38 | 4.46 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB MLE | DET | 10 | 10 | 62 | 264 | 56 | 22 | 9 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.3% | 8.5% | 12.8% | 3.4% | 4.53 | 4.62 | +0.6 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB MLE | DET | 9 | 9 | 51 | 217 | 45 | 19 | 8 | 100% | 5.7 | 20.6% | 8.8% | 11.8% | 3.6% | 4.71 | 4.83 | +0.3 |
| 2032 | 31 | MLB MLE | DET | 7 | 7 | 40 | 167 | 33 | 15 | 6 | 100% | 5.7 | 19.8% | 9.1% | 10.7% | 3.8% | 4.92 | 5.06 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 13 | 13 | 77 | 325 | 71 | 26 | 10 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.0% | 8.1% | 13.9% | 3.0% | 4.19 | 4.31 | +0.9 |
| 2029 | 28 | MLB CTX | DET | 12 | 12 | 69 | 291 | 64 | 24 | 9 | 100% | 5.8 | 21.9% | 8.2% | 13.6% | 3.1% | 4.30 | 4.38 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 29 | MLB CTX | DET | 10 | 10 | 59 | 249 | 53 | 21 | 8 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.3% | 8.5% | 12.8% | 3.3% | 4.45 | 4.54 | +0.5 |
| 2031 | 30 | MLB CTX | DET | 8 | 8 | 49 | 207 | 43 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.6% | 8.8% | 11.8% | 3.4% | 4.63 | 4.75 | +0.3 |
| 2032 | 31 | MLB CTX | DET | 6 | 6 | 38 | 160 | 32 | 15 | 6 | 100% | 6.3 | 19.8% | 9.1% | 10.7% | 3.7% | 4.83 | 4.97 | +0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 85 | 73 | 452 | 1883 | 392 | 156 | 60 | 86% | 5.3 | 20.8% | 8.3% | 12.5% | 3.2% | 3.83 | 4.14 | +6.7 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 37 | 32 | 200 | 833 | 173 | 69 | 27 | 86% | 5.3 | 20.8% | 8.3% | 12.5% | 3.2% | 3.83 | 4.14 | +3.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 106 | 91 | 445 | 1831 | 396 | 137 | 60 | 86% | 4.2 | 21.6% | 7.5% | 14.2% | 3.3% | 3.26 | 4.01 | +5.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 48 | 41 | 200 | 824 | 178 | 61 | 27 | 86% | 4.2 | 21.6% | 7.5% | 14.2% | 3.3% | 3.26 | 4.01 | +2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 10 IPFIP -0.13 → 0.71 (+0.84)K% 38.2% → 28.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 38.24% | — | ×0.740 | 28.29% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.180 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP -0.13 → 0.71, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAErie SeaWolves · 39 IPFIP 1.97 → 2.54 (+0.57)K% 27.4% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.44% | — | ×0.810 | 22.23% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.71% | — | ×1.100 | 7.38% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.61% | ÷1.056 | ×1.200 | 0.69% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 1.97 → 2.54, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 36 IPFIP 2.53 → 3.39 (+0.86)K% 37.8% → 32.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.84% | — | ×0.860 | 32.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.08% | — | ×0.900 | 5.47% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.38% | ÷0.872 | ×1.100 | 4.26% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 74).
Result: FIP 2.53 → 3.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAErie SeaWolves · 101 IPFIP 4.07 → 5.27 (+1.20)K% 27.7% → 22.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.67% | — | ×0.810 | 22.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.98% | — | ×1.100 | 7.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.42% | ÷0.941 | ×1.200 | 5.63% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 4.07 → 5.27, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 65 IPFIP 2.44 → 3.18 (+0.74)K% 22.8% → 17.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.85% | — | ×0.770 | 17.59% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.74% | — | ×1.150 | 7.75% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.75% | ÷0.882 | ×1.250 | 1.06% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 2.44 → 3.18, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 27 IPFIP 2.75 → 3.64 (+0.89)K% 30.0% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.00% | — | ×0.740 | 22.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.45% | — | ×1.180 | 6.44% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.73% | ÷1.216 | ×1.300 | 2.92% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 143).
Result: FIP 2.75 → 3.64, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 2,161 pitcher careers (1,251 from 1990-2025 + 910 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.8 | 70 | 21.0% | 8.3% | 1.26 | 3.93 |
| Bill Dawley ('83-'89, 4 WAR*) | 2.4 | 94 | 19.6%* | 8.3%* | 1.30* | 3.85* |
| Tom Walker ('72-'77, 1 WAR*) | 2.1 | 83 | 20.9%* | 7.5%* | 1.28* | 4.32* |
| Vicente Romo ('68-'82, 5 WAR*) | 3.2 | 81 | 20.5%* | 9.7%* | 1.21* | 4.01* |
| Carlos Torres ('19) | 2.5 | 72 | 20.7% | 8.9% | 1.12 | 4.09 |
| Michael Tonkin ('25) | 1.6 | 55 | 23.2% | 8.1% | 1.28 | 4.23 |
| Scott Sullivan ('04) | 3.7 | 92 | 19.8% | 8.9% | 1.09 | 3.98 |