Alec Marsh
P Kansas City Royals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 27 | 27 | 124 | 6.88 | 4.94 | 26.9% | 10.2% | — | K 22.2% · BB 11.1% · FIP 6.29 | |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX3 levels | 31 | 22 | 137 | 5.20 | 4.29 | 25.8% | 11.3% | 1.8 | K 23.7% · BB 11.6% · FIP 4.69 | |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 31 | 30 | 148 | 4.14 | 3.75 | 23.9% | 7.1% | 2.9 | K 23.4% · BB 7.0% · FIP 3.93 | |
| 2025 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 29 | MLBKC | 21 | 21 | 126 | 4.43 | 4.36 | 22.9% | 8.1% | 1.5 | ||
| 2028PROJ95% MLB | 30 | MLBKC | 17 | 17 | 102 | 4.37 | 4.43 | 22.2% | 8.4% | 1.0 | ||
| 2029PROJ95% MLB | 31 | MLBKC | 15 | 15 | 88 | 4.53 | 4.65 | 21.4% | 8.8% | 0.6 | ||
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 23 | AA MLE | Northwest Arkansas Naturals | 6 | 6 | 25 | 106 | 42 | 13 | 4 | 100% | 4.2 | 32.1% | 13.5% | 18.6% | 4.7% | 4.97 | 4.70 | — |
| 2021 | 23 | AA RAW | Northwest Arkansas Naturals | 6 | 6 | 25 | 106 | 42 | 13 | 4 | 100% | 4.2 | 39.6% | 12.3% | 27.4% | 3.8% | 4.97 | 3.38 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 124 | 579 | 156 | 59 | 28 | 100% | 4.6 | 22.2% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 6.7% | 6.88 | 6.29 | — |
| 2022 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 27 | 27 | 124 | 579 | 156 | 59 | 28 | 100% | 4.6 | 26.9% | 10.2% | 16.8% | 4.8% | 6.88 | 4.94 | — |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 31 | 22 | 137 | 620 | 160 | 70 | 21 | 71% | 4.4 | 23.7% | 11.6% | 12.1% | 3.9% | 5.20 | 4.69 | +1.1 |
| 2023 | 25 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 31 | 22 | 137 | 620 | 160 | 70 | 21 | 71% | 4.4 | 25.8% | 11.3% | 14.5% | 3.4% | 5.20 | 4.29 | +1.8 |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 30 | 148 | 618 | 148 | 44 | 20 | 97% | 4.8 | 23.4% | 7.0% | 16.4% | 3.5% | 4.14 | 3.93 | +2.6 |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 31 | 30 | 148 | 618 | 148 | 44 | 20 | 97% | 4.8 | 23.4% | 7.0% | 16.4% | 3.5% | 4.14 | 3.93 | +2.6 |
| 2024 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 31 | 30 | 148 | 618 | 148 | 44 | 20 | 97% | 4.8 | 23.9% | 7.1% | 16.8% | 3.2% | 4.14 | 3.75 | +2.9 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 43 | 33 | 203 | 890 | 208 | 77 | 35 | 77% | 4.7 | 23.4% | 8.7% | 14.7% | 3.9% | 4.96 | 4.43 | +2.3 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 29 | MLB | KC | 21 | 21 | 126 | 532 | 122 | 43 | 17 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.9% | 8.1% | 14.8% | 3.3% | 4.43 | 4.36 | +1.5 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 30 | MLB MLE | KC | 18 | 18 | 107 | 451 | 100 | 38 | 16 | 100% | 5.9 | 22.2% | 8.4% | 13.8% | 3.5% | 4.51 | 4.57 | +1.0 |
| 2029 | 31 | MLB MLE | KC | 15 | 15 | 93 | 391 | 84 | 34 | 14 | 100% | 6.2 | 21.4% | 8.8% | 12.7% | 3.7% | 4.68 | 4.80 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 32 | MLB MLE | KC | 13 | 13 | 80 | 338 | 70 | 31 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 20.6% | 9.2% | 11.5% | 3.9% | 4.90 | 5.05 | +0.3 |
| 2028 | 30 | MLB CTX | KC | 17 | 17 | 102 | 431 | 96 | 36 | 14 | 100% | 6.0 | 22.2% | 8.4% | 13.8% | 3.2% | 4.37 | 4.43 | +1.0 |
| 2029 | 31 | MLB CTX | KC | 15 | 15 | 88 | 372 | 80 | 33 | 13 | 100% | 5.9 | 21.4% | 8.8% | 12.7% | 3.4% | 4.53 | 4.65 | +0.6 |
| 2030 | 32 | MLB CTX | KC | 13 | 13 | 76 | 321 | 66 | 29 | 12 | 100% | 5.8 | 20.6% | 9.2% | 11.5% | 3.6% | 4.74 | 4.89 | +0.3 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 87 | 77 | 469 | 2011 | 449 | 175 | 73 | 89% | 5.4 | 22.3% | 8.7% | 13.6% | 3.6% | 4.71 | 4.31 | +6.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 37 | 33 | 200 | 858 | 192 | 75 | 31 | 89% | 5.4 | 22.3% | 8.7% | 13.6% | 3.6% | 4.71 | 4.31 | +2.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 95 | 85 | 434 | 1923 | 454 | 194 | 89 | 89% | 4.6 | 23.6% | 10.1% | 13.5% | 4.6% | 5.30 | 4.93 | +4.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 44 | 39 | 200 | 885 | 209 | 89 | 41 | 89% | 4.6 | 23.6% | 10.1% | 13.5% | 4.6% | 5.30 | 4.93 | +1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 19 IPFIP 1.95 → 2.26 (+0.31)K% 35.7% → 30.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.71% | — | ×0.860 | 30.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.57% | — | ×0.900 | 7.71% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.43% | ÷1.111 | ×1.100 | 1.41% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 122).
Result: FIP 1.95 → 2.26, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 47 IPFIP 3.34 → 4.30 (+0.96)K% 26.4% → 21.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.42% | — | ×0.810 | 21.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.32% | — | ×1.100 | 12.45% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.89% | ÷0.872 | ×1.200 | 2.60% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 74).
Result: FIP 3.34 → 4.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 15 IPFIP 2.84 → 3.19 (+0.35)K% 28.8% → 24.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.79% | — | ×0.860 | 24.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.61% | — | ×0.900 | 9.55% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.52% | ÷0.942 | ×1.100 | 1.77% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).
Result: FIP 2.84 → 3.19, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 114 IPFIP 4.83 → 6.29 (+1.47)K% 27.4% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.43% | — | ×0.810 | 22.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.07% | — | ×1.100 | 11.08% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.04% | ÷0.905 | ×1.200 | 6.68% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 4.83 → 6.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 10 IPFIP 4.08 → 4.52 (+0.44)K% 20.9% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.93% | — | ×0.880 | 18.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.63% | — | ×1.050 | 12.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.33% | ÷0.984 | ×1.100 | 2.60% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 4.08 → 4.52, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 25 IPFIP 3.38 → 4.70 (+1.32)K% 39.6% → 32.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 39.62% | — | ×0.810 | 32.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.26% | — | ×1.100 | 13.49% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.77% | ÷0.957 | ×1.200 | 4.73% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 3.38 → 4.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 927 starter careers (497 from 1990-2025 + 430 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.0 | 102 | 22.4% | 8.6% | 1.42 | 4.72 |
| James Kaprielian ('23) | 1.6 | 106 | 20.5% | 9.7% | 1.30 | 4.61 |
| Brent Strom ('72-'77, 0 WAR*) | 2.5 | 125 | 19.3%* | 8.2%* | 1.53* | 4.78* |
| Dan Straily ('19) | 4.0 | 115 | 19.8% | 9.1% | 1.60 | 4.56 |
| Nate Karns ('19) | 1.6 | 105 | 24.0% | 9.3% | 1.34 | 4.30 |
| Chris Knapp ('75-'80, -1 WAR*) | 3.0 | 121 | 21.3%* | 9.3%* | 1.41* | 5.48* |
| Jack Armstrong ('88-'94, 2 WAR*) | 3.9 | 131 | 19.2%* | 9.2%* | 1.59* | 4.89* |