Jude Warwick
SS Lakeland Flying Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 19 | A/ROKDET | 278 | .257/.380/.345 | 3 | 28 | 57 | — | .199/.299/.274 |
| 2026 | 20 | ADET | 446 | .214/.303/.357 | 10 | 15 | 35 | — | .160/.231/.259 |
| 2027PROJMLE | 21 | MLBDET | 556 | .172/.245/.266 | 8 | 14 | 45 | -0.6 | |
| 2028PROJ25% MLB | 22 | MLBDET | 99 | .176/.249/.276 | 2 | 3 | 52 | -0.2 | |
| 2029PROJ38% MLB | 23 | MLBDET | 170 | .181/.255/.289 | 3 | 5 | 57 | -0.3 |
Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 86 | 81 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 247 | 282 | 284 | 566 | 37 | 377 | 34 | 3 | 257 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK | FCL Tigers | — | 192 | 145 | 38 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 26 | 30 | 15 | 22 | 5 | 262 | 425 | 379 | 804 | 117 | 299 | 16 | 14 | 365 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 446 | 392 | 84 | 20 | 3 | 10 | 44 | 125 | 6 | 15 | 4 | 214 | 303 | 357 | 660 | 143 | 285 | 28 | 10 | 297 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 86 | 82 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 39 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 183 | 212 | 207 | 419 | 24 | 355 | 45 | 2 | 198 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Tigers | — | 192 | 155 | 32 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 43 | 15 | 22 | 5 | 206 | 339 | 303 | 642 | 97 | 231 | 22 | 8 | 277 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 446 | 405 | 65 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 31 | 170 | 6 | 15 | 4 | 160 | 231 | 259 | 490 | 99 | 246 | 38 | 7 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 278 | 237 | 47 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 83 | 16 | 28 | 6 | 198 | 299 | 270 | 569 | 72 | 280 | 30 | 6 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 278 | 226 | 58 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 59 | 16 | 28 | 6 | 257 | 380 | 345 | 725 | 88 | 324 | 21 | 10 | 332 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 446 | 405 | 65 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 31 | 170 | 6 | 15 | 4 | 160 | 231 | 259 | 490 | 99 | 251 | 38 | 7 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A RAW | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 446 | 392 | 84 | 20 | 3 | 10 | 44 | 125 | 6 | 15 | 4 | 214 | 303 | 357 | 660 | 143 | 285 | 28 | 10 | 297 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 278 | 242 | 47 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 83 | 16 | 28 | 6 | 194 | 299 | 264 | 563 | 70 | 269 | 30 | 6 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 446 | 406 | 65 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 31 | 170 | 6 | 15 | 4 | 160 | 231 | 259 | 489 | 99 | 246 | 38 | 7 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 19 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 278 | 242 | 47 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 83 | 16 | 28 | 6 | 194 | 299 | 264 | 563 | 70 | 269 | 30 | 6 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 20 | A MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 446 | 406 | 65 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 31 | 170 | 6 | 15 | 4 | 160 | 231 | 259 | 489 | 99 | 246 | 38 | 7 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ 2027 season | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ 2027 — full MLE projection (neutral park, full availability) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 21 | MLB MLE | DET | 0% | 556 | 502 | 86 | 18 | 2 | 8 | 38 | 191 | 11 | 14 | 3 | 172 | 245 | 266 | 510 | 94 | 254 | 34 | 7 | 235 | 45 | -36 | +2 | -2 | +6 | +12 | -0.6 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (PA × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 22 | MLB MLE | DET | 25% | 398 | 360 | 65 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 28 | 133 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 179 | 252 | 283 | 535 | 104 | 257 | 33 | 7 | 245 | 52 | -23 | +1 | -1 | +4 | +9 | -1.0 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB MLE | DET | 38% | 445 | 402 | 75 | 15 | 2 | 9 | 32 | 145 | 8 | 12 | 3 | 184 | 258 | 296 | 554 | 111 | 259 | 33 | 7 | 252 | 57 | -23 | +1 | -0 | +5 | +10 | -0.7 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB MLE | DET | 44% | 494 | 446 | 84 | 17 | 2 | 10 | 36 | 158 | 9 | 13 | 3 | 189 | 263 | 305 | 567 | 116 | 262 | 32 | 7 | 258 | 61 | -23 | +1 | +1 | +5 | +11 | -0.5 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB MLE | DET | 47% | 550 | 494 | 95 | 19 | 2 | 12 | 41 | 173 | 10 | 14 | 3 | 192 | 266 | 311 | 578 | 119 | 264 | 31 | 7 | 262 | 64 | -24 | +2 | +1 | +6 | +12 | -0.4 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB MLE | DET | 49% | 558 | 501 | 97 | 19 | 2 | 12 | 42 | 173 | 10 | 14 | 3 | 194 | 269 | 316 | 585 | 121 | 265 | 31 | 8 | 265 | 66 | -23 | +2 | +1 | +6 | +12 | -0.2 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB MLE | DET | 49% | 558 | 502 | 96 | 19 | 2 | 12 | 42 | 174 | 9 | 14 | 3 | 193 | 268 | 313 | 581 | 120 | 265 | 31 | 8 | 264 | 65 | -23 | +2 | +1 | +6 | +12 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 22 | MLB CTX | DET | 25% | 99 | 90 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 33 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 176 | 249 | 276 | 526 | 101 | 253 | 33 | 7 | 241 | 52 | -6 | +0 | -0 | +1 | +2 | -0.2 |
| 2029 | 23 | MLB CTX | DET | 38% | 170 | 153 | 28 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 55 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 181 | 255 | 289 | 544 | 108 | 255 | 32 | 7 | 248 | 57 | -9 | +1 | -0 | +2 | +4 | -0.3 |
| 2030 | 24 | MLB CTX | DET | 44% | 217 | 195 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 69 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 185 | 260 | 297 | 557 | 112 | 258 | 32 | 7 | 254 | 61 | -10 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +5 | -0.2 |
| 2031 | 25 | MLB CTX | DET | 47% | 260 | 234 | 44 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 82 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 188 | 263 | 304 | 567 | 115 | 259 | 32 | 7 | 258 | 64 | -11 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +6 | -0.2 |
| 2032 | 26 | MLB CTX | DET | 49% | 274 | 247 | 47 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 20 | 85 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 191 | 266 | 308 | 574 | 117 | 261 | 31 | 7 | 261 | 66 | -11 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +6 | -0.1 |
| 2033 | 27 | MLB CTX | DET | 49% | 274 | 246 | 47 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 85 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 190 | 265 | 306 | 571 | 116 | 260 | 31 | 8 | 260 | 65 | -12 | +1 | +0 | +3 | +6 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | A+C | — | 1294 | 1165 | 217 | 43 | 5 | 26 | 95 | 409 | 24 | 35 | 9 | 186 | 262 | 299 | 560 | 112 | 260 | 32 | 7 | 256 | 57 | -58 | +3 | +1 | +14 | +28 | -1.2 | |
| / 162G | — | A+C | — | 650 | 585 | 110 | 22 | 3 | 13 | 48 | 205 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 188 | 264 | 303 | 567 | 115 | 262 | 32 | 7 | 256 | 57 | -29 | +2 | +1 | +7 | +14 | -0.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | — | 3937 | 3537 | 657 | 132 | 15 | 75 | 284 | 1281 | 79 | 125 | 29 | 186 | 262 | 295 | 557 | 109 | 264 | 33 | 7 | 253 | 57 | -152 | +9 | +2 | +34 | +70 | -3.9 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 584 | 108 | 22 | 2 | 12 | 47 | 211 | 13 | 21 | 5 | 185 | 261 | 291 | 552 | 106 | 263 | 32 | 7 | 253 | 57 | -31 | +2 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 446 PAwOBA .292 → .220 (−72)K% 28.0% → 38.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.03% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 38.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.87% | ÷1.000 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 6.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.35% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 1.07% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.10% | ÷1.000 | ×0.920 | ×0.958 | ×1.015 | 17.09% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×0.958 | ×1.015 | 6.05% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.12% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.958 | ×1.015 | 0.99% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.75% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 3.04% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.958.
Result: wOBA .292 → .220; ISO .143 → .105; BABIP .285 → .246. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ROKFCL Tigers · 192 PAwOBA .366 → .277 (−89)K% 15.6% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.62% | ÷1.001 | ×1.440 | — | — | 22.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.54% | ÷0.996 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 8.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 7.81% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 5.60% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.48% | ÷0.974 | ×0.820 | ×0.951 | ×0.995 | 18.70% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.96% | ÷0.992 | ×0.720 | ×0.951 | ×0.995 | 4.78% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.720 | ×0.951 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.61% | ÷0.880 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 2.30% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 95, 2B 98, 3B 80, K 100, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.951.
Result: wOBA .366 → .277; ISO .117 → .098; BABIP .299 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 ALakeland Flying Tigers · 86 PAwOBA .253 → .198 (−55)K% 33.7% → 45.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 33.72% | ÷0.998 | ×1.360 | — | — | 45.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.49% | ÷0.945 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 2.62% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.16% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.93% |
| Singles /BIP | 32.69% | ÷1.051 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.030 | 30.94% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.77% | ÷0.971 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.030 | 5.33% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.864 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 110, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 100, BB 89 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .253 → .198; ISO .037 → .029; BABIP .377 → .355. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).