Braylon Owens
P Wisconsin Timber Rattlers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 21 | 14 | 94 | 4.04 | 3.07 | 29.9% | 10.9% | — | K 23.5% · BB 12.3% · FIP 4.06 |
| 2027PROJ | 24 | MLBMIL | — | — | 0 | 4.57 | 4.57 | 23.5% | 12.0% | — | |
| 2028PROJ43% MLB | 25 | MLBMIL | 5 | 5 | 31 | 4.54 | 4.49 | 23.8% | 10.9% | 0.4 | |
| 2029PROJ66% MLB | 26 | MLBMIL | 7 | 7 | 46 | 4.48 | 4.46 | 23.8% | 10.6% | 0.5 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 14 | 94 | 394 | 118 | 43 | 8 | 67% | 4.5 | 23.5% | 12.3% | 11.1% | 2.5% | 4.04 | 4.06 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 21 | 14 | 94 | 394 | 118 | 43 | 8 | 67% | 4.5 | 23.5% | 12.3% | 11.1% | 2.5% | 4.04 | 4.06 | — |
| 2026 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 21 | 14 | 94 | 394 | 118 | 43 | 8 | 67% | 4.5 | 29.9% | 10.9% | 19.0% | 2.0% | 4.04 | 3.07 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 24 | MLB | MIL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.5% | 12.0% | 11.5% | 2.8% | 4.57 | 4.57 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 25 | MLB MLE | MIL | 11 | 11 | 73 | 307 | 73 | 33 | 9 | 100% | 6.6 | 23.8% | 10.9% | 12.9% | 2.8% | 4.46 | 4.41 | +0.8 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB MLE | MIL | 10 | 10 | 70 | 294 | 70 | 31 | 8 | 100% | 7.0 | 23.8% | 10.6% | 13.2% | 2.8% | 4.40 | 4.38 | +0.8 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB MLE | MIL | 10 | 10 | 67 | 282 | 67 | 30 | 8 | 100% | 6.7 | 23.7% | 10.5% | 13.2% | 2.9% | 4.40 | 4.41 | +0.8 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB MLE | MIL | 9 | 9 | 64 | 268 | 63 | 28 | 8 | 100% | 7.1 | 23.5% | 10.6% | 12.9% | 3.0% | 4.45 | 4.49 | +0.7 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB MLE | MIL | 10 | 10 | 65 | 274 | 69 | 28 | 9 | 100% | 6.5 | 25.3% | 10.1% | 15.3% | 3.2% | 4.39 | 4.35 | +0.8 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB MLE | MIL | 9 | 9 | 59 | 248 | 62 | 26 | 8 | 100% | 6.5 | 25.0% | 10.3% | 14.6% | 3.4% | 4.47 | 4.53 | +0.6 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB MLE | MIL | 8 | 8 | 52 | 219 | 54 | 23 | 8 | 100% | 6.5 | 24.6% | 10.7% | 13.9% | 3.6% | 4.62 | 4.73 | +0.4 |
| 2035 | 32 | MLB MLE | MIL | 7 | 7 | 45 | 190 | 46 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.4 | 24.1% | 11.1% | 13.0% | 3.8% | 4.82 | 4.95 | +0.2 |
| 2028 | 25 | MLB CTX | MIL | 5 | 5 | 31 | 131 | 31 | 14 | 4 | 100% | 6.2 | 23.8% | 10.9% | 12.9% | 3.0% | 4.54 | 4.49 | +0.4 |
| 2029 | 26 | MLB CTX | MIL | 7 | 7 | 46 | 194 | 46 | 21 | 6 | 100% | 6.6 | 23.8% | 10.6% | 13.2% | 3.0% | 4.48 | 4.46 | +0.5 |
| 2030 | 27 | MLB CTX | MIL | 8 | 8 | 52 | 220 | 52 | 23 | 7 | 100% | 6.5 | 23.7% | 10.5% | 13.2% | 3.1% | 4.48 | 4.49 | +0.6 |
| 2031 | 28 | MLB CTX | MIL | 8 | 8 | 53 | 224 | 53 | 24 | 7 | 100% | 6.6 | 23.5% | 10.6% | 12.9% | 3.2% | 4.53 | 4.57 | +0.6 |
| 2032 | 29 | MLB CTX | MIL | 9 | 9 | 57 | 241 | 61 | 24 | 8 | 100% | 6.3 | 25.3% | 10.1% | 15.3% | 3.3% | 4.48 | 4.44 | +0.7 |
| 2033 | 30 | MLB CTX | MIL | 8 | 8 | 53 | 224 | 56 | 23 | 8 | 100% | 6.6 | 25.0% | 10.3% | 14.6% | 3.5% | 4.56 | 4.62 | +0.5 |
| 2034 | 31 | MLB CTX | MIL | 7 | 7 | 47 | 198 | 49 | 21 | 7 | 100% | 6.7 | 24.6% | 10.7% | 13.9% | 3.8% | 4.72 | 4.83 | +0.4 |
| 2035 | 32 | MLB CTX | MIL | 6 | 6 | 42 | 177 | 43 | 20 | 7 | 100% | 7.0 | 24.1% | 11.1% | 13.0% | 4.0% | 4.93 | 5.06 | +0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 57 | 57 | 381 | 1610 | 391 | 170 | 54 | 100% | 6.7 | 24.3% | 10.6% | 13.7% | 3.4% | 4.58 | 4.23 | +5.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 30 | 30 | 200 | 844 | 205 | 89 | 28 | 100% | 6.7 | 24.3% | 10.6% | 13.7% | 3.4% | 4.58 | 4.23 | +2.8 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 21 | 14 | 94 | 394 | 92 | 49 | 10 | 67% | 4.5 | 23.5% | 12.3% | 11.1% | 2.5% | 4.04 | 4.06 | +5.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 45 | 30 | 200 | 841 | 197 | 104 | 21 | 67% | 4.5 | 23.5% | 12.3% | 11.1% | 2.5% | 4.04 | 4.06 | +2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 A+Wisconsin Timber Rattlers · 64 IPFIP 3.07 → 4.15 (+1.08)K% 30.0% → 23.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.04% | — | ×0.770 | 23.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.89% | — | ×1.150 | 11.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.28% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 2.85% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.07 → 4.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AABiloxi Shuckers · 30 IPFIP 3.07 → 3.88 (+0.81)K% 29.8% → 24.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.77% | — | ×0.810 | 24.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.98% | — | ×1.100 | 14.27% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.53% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 1.83% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.07 → 3.88, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 2.8 | 62 | 24.1% | 10.8% | 1.20 | 4.49 |
| Hansel Robles ('22) | 2.1 | 61 | 25.3% | 10.2% | 1.20 | 4.11 |
| Buck Farmer ('24) | 2.6 | 51 | 21.6% | 10.5% | 1.24 | 4.71 |
| Luis Vizcaino ('09) | 2.7 | 68 | 21.0% | 10.1% | 1.30 | 4.33 |
| Tim Stoddard ('75-'89, 4 WAR*) | 3.6 | 66 | 26.2%* | 11.2%* | 1.14* | 4.24* |
| Jeff Parrett ('86-'96, 6 WAR*) | 3.6 | 72 | 24.8%* | 11.0%* | 1.02* | 4.07* |
| Xavier Hernandez ('89-'98, 3 WAR*) | 3.4 | 67 | 23.9%* | 9.1%* | 1.12* | 4.20* |