Anderson Navas
P FCL Phillies| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 19 | ROKPHI | 11 | 0 | 15 | 5.87 | 5.25 | 16.2% | 20.6% | — | K 11.0% · BB 25.7% · FIP 6.56 |
| 2027PROJ | 20 | MLBPHI | — | — | 0 | 5.76 | 5.76 | 20.8% | 18.9% | — | |
| 2028PROJ49% MLB | 21 | MLBPHI | 7 | 0 | 7 | 5.55 | 5.43 | 21.4% | 16.1% | -0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Phillies | 11 | 0 | 15 | 68 | 11 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.4 | 11.0% | 25.7% | -14.7% | 2.1% | 5.87 | 6.56 | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK MLE | FCL Phillies | 11 | 0 | 15 | 68 | 11 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.4 | 11.0% | 25.7% | -14.7% | 2.1% | 5.87 | 6.56 | — |
| 2026 | 19 | ROK RAW | FCL Phillies | 11 | 0 | 15 | 68 | 11 | 14 | 1 | 0% | 1.4 | 16.2% | 20.6% | -4.4% | 1.5% | 5.87 | 5.25 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 20 | MLB | PHI | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.8% | 18.9% | 1.8% | 3.0% | 5.76 | 5.76 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 21 | MLB MLE | PHI | 14 | 0 | 15 | 62 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 16.1% | 5.4% | 2.9% | 5.43 | 5.31 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 21 | MLB CTX | PHI | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 16.1% | 5.4% | 3.1% | 5.55 | 5.43 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.4% | 16.1% | 5.4% | 3.1% | 5.55 | 5.05 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 167 | 139 | 28 | 0% | 1.1 | 21.4% | 16.1% | 5.4% | 3.1% | 5.55 | 5.05 | -1.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 11 | 0 | 15 | 68 | 7 | 18 | 1 | 0% | 1.4 | 11.0% | 25.7% | -14.7% | 2.1% | 5.87 | 6.56 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 143 | 0 | 200 | 887 | 98 | 228 | 18 | 0% | 1.4 | 11.0% | 25.7% | -14.7% | 2.1% | 5.87 | 6.56 | -1.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 ROKFCL Phillies · 15 IPFIP 5.15 → 6.56 (+1.41)K% 16.2% → 11.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 16.18% | — | ×0.680 | 11.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.59% | — | ×1.250 | 25.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.47% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 2.06% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.15 → 6.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).