Elison Joseph
P Columbus Clingstones| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 39 | 0 | 53 | 2.04 | 2.31 | 34.1% | 12.6% | — | K 26.8% · BB 14.1% · FIP 3.32 |
| 2025 | 24 | AAATL | 37 | 0 | 40 | 4.31 | 3.33 | 30.5% | 21.9% | — | K 24.7% · BB 24.1% · FIP 4.07 |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 20 | 0 | 24 | 3.80 | 5.93 | 20.7% | 29.3% | — | K 16.8% · BB 32.9% · FIP 6.61 |
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBATL | — | — | 0 | 5.53 | 5.53 | 22.1% | 20.0% | — | |
| 2028PROJ38% MLB | 27 | MLBATL | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5.43 | 5.45 | 22.2% | 19.0% | -0.1 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 20 | ROK MLE | FCL Braves | 16 | 0 | 26 | 117 | 30 | 18 | 2 | 0% | 1.6 | 17.4% | 19.2% | -1.8% | 2.3% | 2.73 | 5.31 | — |
| 2021 | 20 | ROK RAW | FCL Braves | 16 | 0 | 26 | 117 | 30 | 18 | 2 | 0% | 1.6 | 25.6% | 15.4% | 10.3% | 1.7% | 2.73 | 3.86 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 0 | 34 | 160 | 44 | 27 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 19.6% | 20.3% | -0.7% | 1.6% | 4.46 | 4.91 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 28 | 0 | 34 | 160 | 44 | 27 | 2 | 0% | 1.2 | 27.5% | 16.9% | 10.6% | 1.2% | 4.46 | 3.65 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A MLE | Augusta GreenJackets | 38 | 0 | 46 | 215 | 66 | 31 | 7 | 0% | 1.2 | 22.7% | 17.0% | 5.7% | 4.3% | 5.72 | 5.72 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | A RAW | Augusta GreenJackets | 38 | 0 | 46 | 215 | 66 | 31 | 7 | 0% | 1.2 | 30.7% | 14.4% | 16.3% | 3.3% | 5.72 | 4.24 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 53 | 223 | 76 | 28 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 26.8% | 14.1% | 12.7% | 1.3% | 2.04 | 3.32 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 53 | 223 | 76 | 28 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 26.8% | 14.1% | 12.7% | 1.3% | 2.04 | 3.32 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 53 | 223 | 76 | 28 | 2 | 0% | 1.4 | 34.1% | 12.6% | 21.5% | 0.9% | 2.04 | 2.31 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Columbus Clingstones | 37 | 0 | 40 | 187 | 57 | 41 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.7% | 24.1% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 4.31 | 4.07 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA MLE | Columbus Clingstones | 37 | 0 | 40 | 187 | 57 | 41 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.7% | 24.1% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 4.31 | 4.07 | — |
| 2025 | 24 | AA RAW | Columbus Clingstones | 37 | 0 | 40 | 187 | 57 | 41 | 0 | 0% | 1.1 | 30.5% | 21.9% | 8.6% | 0.0% | 4.31 | 3.33 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 0 | 24 | 116 | 24 | 34 | 1 | 0% | 1.2 | 16.8% | 32.9% | -16.1% | 1.4% | 3.80 | 6.61 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 20 | 0 | 24 | 116 | 24 | 34 | 1 | 0% | 1.2 | 16.8% | 32.9% | -16.1% | 1.4% | 3.80 | 6.61 | — |
| 2026 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 20 | 0 | 24 | 116 | 24 | 34 | 1 | 0% | 1.2 | 20.7% | 29.3% | -8.6% | 0.9% | 3.80 | 5.93 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | ATL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.1% | 20.0% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 5.53 | 5.53 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | ATL | 24 | 0 | 25 | 107 | 24 | 20 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.2% | 19.0% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 5.43 | 5.45 | -0.3 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | ATL | 10 | 0 | 10 | 42 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.2% | 19.0% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 5.43 | 5.45 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 9 | 0 | 10 | 40 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.2% | 19.0% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 5.43 | 5.07 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 189 | 168 | 21 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.2% | 19.0% | 3.2% | 2.6% | 5.43 | 5.07 | -1.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 178 | 0 | 223 | 1018 | 226 | 206 | 19 | 0% | 1.3 | 22.2% | 20.3% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 3.84 | 4.82 | -0.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 160 | 0 | 200 | 914 | 203 | 185 | 17 | 0% | 1.3 | 22.2% | 20.3% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 3.84 | 4.82 | -2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAColumbus Clingstones · 18 IPFIP 5.77 → 6.61 (+0.84)K% 20.7% → 16.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.69% | — | ×0.810 | 16.76% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 29.89% | — | ×1.100 | 32.87% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.15% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 1.38% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 5.77 → 6.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 A+Rome Emperors · 6 IPFIP 4.85 → 5.77 (+0.93)K% 20.7% → 15.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.69% | — | ×0.770 | 15.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 27.59% | — | ×1.150 | 31.72% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.85 → 5.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAColumbus Clingstones · 40 IPFIP 3.30 → 4.07 (+0.77)K% 30.5% → 24.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.48% | — | ×0.810 | 24.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 21.93% | — | ×1.100 | 24.12% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.934 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 3.30 → 4.07, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 A+Rome Emperors · 33 IPFIP 1.86 → 2.90 (+1.04)K% 33.8% → 26.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.82% | — | ×0.770 | 26.04% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.56% | — | ×1.150 | 10.99% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.74% | ÷0.831 | ×1.250 | 1.11% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 66).
Result: FIP 1.86 → 2.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAMississippi Braves · 20 IPFIP 3.00 → 3.98 (+0.98)K% 34.5% → 27.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 34.48% | — | ×0.810 | 27.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.24% | — | ×1.100 | 18.97% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.15% | ÷0.906 | ×1.200 | 1.52% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 81).
Result: FIP 3.00 → 3.98, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAugusta GreenJackets · 46 IPFIP 4.12 → 5.72 (+1.60)K% 30.7% → 22.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.70% | — | ×0.740 | 22.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.42% | — | ×1.180 | 17.01% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.26% | ÷0.976 | ×1.300 | 4.34% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 4.12 → 5.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAugusta GreenJackets · 19 IPFIP 3.51 → 4.54 (+1.03)K% 25.8% → 19.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.81% | — | ×0.740 | 19.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 20.43% | — | ×1.180 | 24.11% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.127 | ×1.300 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 125).
Result: FIP 3.51 → 4.54, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKFCL Braves · 15 IPFIP 3.73 → 5.43 (+1.70)K% 29.9% → 20.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.85% | — | ×0.680 | 20.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.94% | — | ×1.250 | 14.93% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.99% | ÷1.066 | ×1.400 | 3.92% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 113).
Result: FIP 3.73 → 5.43, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).