Cody Scroggins

P Bowie Baysox
Age 30 RHP 6'0" / 195 lbs AA
Overview
AAPROSPECT
MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202225MIX2 levels440515.123.8126.6%13.7%—K 20.5% · BB 16.2% · FIP 4.50
202326MIX2 levels110184.005.2717.7%6.3%—K 17.7% · BB 6.3% · FIP 5.18
202427MIX3 levels180275.604.4515.3%13.0%—K 14.2% · BB 9.6% · FIP 3.78
202528No MLB games played
202629No MLB games played
2027PROJ30MLBBOS——04.464.4621.6%9.3%—
2028PROJ31% MLB31MLBBOS6064.574.6521.4%9.6%-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsNeil Wagner (age 29) · Joe Nelson (age 31) · Jim Miller (age 30)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 118110vR 102
ERA4.46
FIP4.46
K%21.6%
BB%9.3%
K-BB%12.3%
Proj IP10
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 10 IP
K: -0.0 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-0KBB: -0.1 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-0BBCONTACT: -0.2 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-0CONTACTSTAM: +0.4 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+0STAMTotal WAR: +0.01 (10 IP)+0.0WAR
0.00.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†5050

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202124MIX MLE2 levels37049216502850%1.317.4%15.1%2.3%3.3%3.335.35—
202124MIX RAW2 levels37049216502850%1.323.1%13.0%10.2%2.3%3.334.11—
202225MIX MLE2 levels44051241643350%1.220.5%16.2%4.3%2.0%5.124.50—
202225MIX RAW2 levels44051241643350%1.226.6%13.7%12.9%2.1%5.123.81—
202326MIX MLE2 levels110187914540%1.617.7%6.3%11.4%5.1%4.005.18—
202326MIX RAW2 levels110187914540%1.617.7%6.3%11.4%5.1%4.005.27—
202427MIX MLE3 levels18027131201720%1.514.2%9.6%4.5%1.2%5.603.78—
202427MIX MLE3 levels18027131201720%1.514.2%9.6%4.5%1.2%5.603.78—
202427MIX RAW3 levels18027131201720%1.515.3%13.0%2.3%1.5%5.604.45—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202730MLBBOS——0——————21.6%9.3%12.3%3.0%4.464.46—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202831MLB MLEBOS170187516720%1.021.4%9.6%11.8%3.2%4.574.65-0.0
202831MLB CTXBOS606255210%1.021.4%9.6%11.8%3.2%4.574.65-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW506245210%1.121.4%9.6%11.8%3.2%4.574.27+0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW190020084418072360%1.121.4%9.6%11.8%3.2%4.574.27+0.7
Career— MLE110014566711989170%1.317.9%13.4%4.5%2.6%4.474.71-0.0
/ 200 IP— MLE1520200920165123240%1.317.9%13.4%4.5%2.6%4.474.71-0.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2024 AABowie Baysox · 18 IPFIP 3.42 → 3.78 (+0.36)K% 17.5% → 14.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF17.50%—×0.81014.17%
BB% (unintentional) /BF8.75%—×1.1009.62%
HR / BF /BF1.25%÷1.249×1.2001.20%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 150).

Result: FIP 3.42 → 3.78, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 A+Aberdeen IronBirds · 8 IPFIP 4.62 → 5.21 (+0.59)K% 11.1% → 8.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF11.11%—×0.7708.56%
BB% (unintentional) /BF19.44%—×1.15022.36%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.026×1.2500.00%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 105).

Result: FIP 4.62 → 5.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ASalem Red Sox · 10 IPFIP 5.12 → 6.37 (+1.26)K% 15.9% → 11.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF15.91%—×0.74011.77%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.82%—×1.1808.05%
HR / BF /BF4.55%÷0.999×1.3005.91%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 5.12 → 6.37, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 8 IPFIP 5.27 → 6.12 (+0.85)K% 20.0% → 16.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF20.00%—×0.81016.20%
BB% (unintentional) /BF5.71%—×1.1006.29%
HR / BF /BF5.71%÷1.048×1.2006.54%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).

Result: FIP 5.27 → 6.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 A+Greenville Drive · 41 IPFIP 3.50 → 4.50 (+1.00)K% 26.6% → 20.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF26.56%—×0.77020.45%
BB% (unintentional) /BF14.06%—×1.15016.17%
HR / BF /BF1.56%÷0.996×1.2501.96%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).

Result: FIP 3.50 → 4.50, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 10 IPFIP 4.65 → 5.67 (+1.02)K% 26.5% → 21.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF26.53%—×0.81021.49%
BB% (unintentional) /BF12.24%—×1.10013.47%
HR / BF /BF4.08%÷1.004×1.2004.88%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 101).

Result: FIP 4.65 → 5.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 ASalem Red Sox · 27 IPFIP 2.59 → 3.61 (+1.02)K% 25.6% → 19.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.64%—×0.74018.97%
BB% (unintentional) /BF9.40%—×1.18011.09%
HR / BF /BF0.85%÷0.858×1.3001.30%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 72).

Result: FIP 2.59 → 3.61, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 A+Greenville Drive · 22 IPFIP 5.79 → 7.40 (+1.61)K% 20.2% → 15.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF20.20%—×0.77015.56%
BB% (unintentional) /BF17.17%—×1.15019.75%
HR / BF /BF4.04%÷0.891×1.2505.67%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).

Result: FIP 5.79 → 7.40, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).