Andrew Schultz
P Springfield Cardinals| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27 | MIX3 levels | 42 | 0 | 42 | 5.10 | 3.43 | 28.6% | 14.8% | — | K 22.6% · BB 14.8% · FIP 3.68 |
| 2025 | 28 | AAPHI | 14 | 0 | 15 | 6.14 | 4.46 | 23.1% | 12.8% | — | K 18.7% · BB 14.1% · FIP 4.94 |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX2 levels | 28 | 0 | 29 | 4.71 | 3.07 | 32.1% | 17.9% | — | K 26.6% · BB 17.5% · FIP 3.56 |
| 2027PROJ | 30 | MLBSTL | — | — | 0 | 4.74 | 4.74 | 24.4% | 15.0% | — | |
| 2028PROJ31% MLB | 31 | MLBSTL | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4.82 | 4.90 | 23.9% | 14.8% | -0.0 |
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 12 | 0 | 11 | 56 | 15 | 8 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 20.9% | 17.8% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 6.55 | 5.25 | — |
| 2019 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 12 | 0 | 11 | 56 | 15 | 8 | 1 | 0% | 0.9 | 26.8% | 14.3% | 12.5% | 1.8% | 6.55 | 3.74 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 45 | 0 | 45 | 210 | 62 | 34 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.0% | 18.3% | 4.7% | 2.0% | 4.03 | 4.59 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 45 | 0 | 45 | 210 | 62 | 34 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 29.5% | 16.2% | 13.3% | 1.4% | 4.03 | 3.48 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | AA MLE | Reading Fightin Phils | 34 | 0 | 38 | 176 | 41 | 29 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.9% | 18.1% | 0.7% | 1.9% | 5.97 | 4.87 | — |
| 2023 | 26 | AA RAW | Reading Fightin Phils | 34 | 0 | 38 | 176 | 41 | 29 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.3% | 16.5% | 6.8% | 1.7% | 5.97 | 4.27 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 42 | 0 | 42 | 196 | 56 | 29 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.6% | 14.8% | 7.9% | 1.1% | 5.10 | 3.68 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 42 | 0 | 42 | 196 | 56 | 29 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.6% | 14.8% | 7.9% | 1.1% | 5.10 | 3.68 | — |
| 2024 | 27 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 42 | 0 | 42 | 196 | 56 | 29 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 28.6% | 14.8% | 13.8% | 1.5% | 5.10 | 3.43 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AA MLE | Reading Fightin Phils | 14 | 0 | 15 | 78 | 18 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.7% | 14.1% | 4.6% | 3.0% | 6.14 | 4.94 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AA MLE | Reading Fightin Phils | 14 | 0 | 15 | 78 | 18 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 18.7% | 14.1% | 4.6% | 3.0% | 6.14 | 4.94 | — |
| 2025 | 28 | AA RAW | Reading Fightin Phils | 14 | 0 | 15 | 78 | 18 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.1% | 12.8% | 10.3% | 2.6% | 6.14 | 4.46 | — |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 0 | 29 | 134 | 43 | 24 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 26.6% | 17.5% | 9.1% | 0.9% | 4.71 | 3.56 | — |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 28 | 0 | 29 | 134 | 43 | 24 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 26.6% | 17.5% | 9.1% | 0.9% | 4.71 | 3.56 | — |
| 2026 | 29 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 28 | 0 | 29 | 134 | 43 | 24 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 32.1% | 17.9% | 14.2% | 0.7% | 4.71 | 3.07 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 30 | MLB | STL | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24.4% | 15.0% | 9.3% | 2.6% | 4.74 | 4.74 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 31 | MLB MLE | STL | 16 | 0 | 17 | 71 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.9% | 14.8% | 9.1% | 2.8% | 4.82 | 4.90 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 31 | MLB CTX | STL | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.9% | 14.8% | 9.1% | 2.8% | 4.82 | 4.90 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.9% | 14.8% | 9.1% | 2.8% | 4.82 | 4.52 | +0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 191 | 115 | 38 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.9% | 14.8% | 9.1% | 2.8% | 4.82 | 4.52 | +0.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 175 | 0 | 179 | 850 | 188 | 144 | 15 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.1% | 16.9% | 5.2% | 1.8% | 5.13 | 4.35 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 196 | 0 | 200 | 950 | 210 | 161 | 17 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.1% | 16.9% | 5.2% | 1.8% | 5.13 | 4.35 | -0.8 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AASpringfield Cardinals · 19 IPFIP 2.30 → 3.10 (+0.80)K% 33.3% → 27.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 33.33% | — | ×0.810 | 27.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.71% | — | ×1.100 | 11.79% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.19% | ÷1.000 | ×1.200 | 1.43% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.30 → 3.10, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2026 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 9 IPFIP 4.37 → 4.34 (−0.03)K% 30.0% → 25.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.00% | — | ×0.860 | 25.80% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 30.00% | — | ×0.900 | 27.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.37 → 4.34, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2025 AAReading Fightin Phils · 15 IPFIP 4.18 → 4.94 (+0.75)K% 23.1% → 18.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.08% | — | ×0.810 | 18.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.82% | — | ×1.100 | 14.10% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.56% | ÷1.036 | ×1.200 | 2.97% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 4.18 → 4.94, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAReading Fightin Phils · 41 IPFIP 3.03 → 3.68 (+0.65)K% 28.0% → 22.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.96% | — | ×0.810 | 22.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 13.44% | — | ×1.100 | 14.78% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.08% | ÷1.137 | ×1.200 | 1.13% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).
Result: FIP 3.03 → 3.68, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAReading Fightin Phils · 38 IPFIP 4.16 → 4.87 (+0.72)K% 23.3% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.30% | — | ×0.810 | 18.87% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.48% | — | ×1.100 | 18.12% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.70% | ÷1.050 | ×1.200 | 1.95% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).
Result: FIP 4.16 → 4.87, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 A+Jersey Shore BlueClaws · 30 IPFIP 3.19 → 4.65 (+1.46)K% 35.0% → 27.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 35.04% | — | ×0.770 | 26.98% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.60% | — | ×1.150 | 16.79% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.19% | ÷0.881 | ×1.250 | 3.11% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 3.19 → 4.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAReading Fightin Phils · 15 IPFIP 3.91 → 4.46 (+0.55)K% 19.2% → 15.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.18% | — | ×0.810 | 15.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.18% | — | ×1.100 | 21.10% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.051 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 110).
Result: FIP 3.91 → 4.46, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ALakewood BlueClaws · 10 IPFIP 3.66 → 5.25 (+1.59)K% 28.3% → 20.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.30% | — | ×0.740 | 20.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.09% | — | ×1.180 | 17.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.89% | ÷0.809 | ×1.300 | 3.03% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 62).
Result: FIP 3.66 → 5.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).