Jordy Luciano
P Tampa Tarpons| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 21 | ROKDSL NYY Yanke… | 15 | 0 | 24 | 4.50 | 3.27 | 36.6% | 17.9% | — | K 24.9% · BB 22.3% · FIP 4.97 | |
| 2023 | 22 | ROKNYY | 12 | 0 | 25 | 5.40 | 4.42 | 22.1% | 19.8% | — | K 15.1% · BB 24.8% · FIP 5.40 | |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX2 levels | 38 | 0 | 64 | 4.95 | 3.89 | 24.7% | 16.3% | — | K 18.0% · BB 20.6% · FIP 5.30 | |
| 2025 | 24 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 26 | MLBNYY | — | — | 0 | 5.12 | 5.12 | 22.0% | 14.7% | — | ||
| 2028PROJ36% MLB | 27 | MLBNYY | 10 | 0 | 11 | 5.06 | 5.07 | 22.1% | 14.2% | -0.1 | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 21 | ROK MLE | DSL NYY Yankees | 15 | 0 | 24 | 112 | 41 | 20 | 2 | 0% | 1.6 | 24.9% | 22.3% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 4.50 | 4.97 | — |
| 2022 | 21 | ROK RAW | DSL NYY Yankees | 15 | 0 | 24 | 112 | 41 | 20 | 2 | 0% | 1.6 | 36.6% | 17.9% | 18.7% | 1.8% | 4.50 | 3.27 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | ROK MLE | FCL Yankees | 12 | 0 | 25 | 131 | 29 | 26 | 1 | 0% | 2.1 | 15.1% | 24.8% | -9.8% | 0.8% | 5.40 | 5.40 | — |
| 2023 | 22 | ROK RAW | FCL Yankees | 12 | 0 | 25 | 131 | 29 | 26 | 1 | 0% | 2.1 | 22.1% | 19.8% | 2.3% | 0.8% | 5.40 | 4.42 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 38 | 0 | 64 | 295 | 73 | 48 | 4 | 0% | 1.7 | 18.0% | 20.6% | -2.6% | 2.0% | 4.95 | 5.30 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 38 | 0 | 64 | 295 | 73 | 48 | 4 | 0% | 1.7 | 18.0% | 20.6% | -2.6% | 2.0% | 4.95 | 5.30 | — |
| 2024 | 23 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 38 | 0 | 64 | 295 | 73 | 48 | 4 | 0% | 1.7 | 24.7% | 16.3% | 8.5% | 1.4% | 4.95 | 3.89 | — |
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 26 | MLB | NYY | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.0% | 14.7% | 7.3% | 3.0% | 5.12 | 5.12 | — |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 27 | MLB MLE | NYY | 28 | 0 | 29 | 123 | 27 | 18 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.1% | 14.2% | 7.9% | 3.0% | 5.06 | 5.07 | -0.2 |
| 2028 | 27 | MLB CTX | NYY | 10 | 0 | 11 | 46 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 14.2% | 7.9% | 3.0% | 5.06 | 5.07 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 10 | 0 | 11 | 45 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 14.2% | 7.9% | 3.0% | 5.06 | 4.69 | -0.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 190 | 0 | 200 | 844 | 188 | 113 | 19 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.1% | 14.2% | 7.9% | 3.0% | 5.06 | 4.69 | -0.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 65 | 0 | 113 | 538 | 101 | 118 | 9 | 0% | 1.7 | 18.7% | 22.0% | -3.3% | 1.7% | 4.95 | 5.26 | -0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 115 | 0 | 200 | 955 | 179 | 210 | 17 | 0% | 1.7 | 18.7% | 22.0% | -3.3% | 1.7% | 4.95 | 5.26 | -1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2024 ATampa Tarpons · 55 IPFIP 4.10 → 5.30 (+1.21)K% 24.3% → 18.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 24.33% | — | ×0.740 | 18.01% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.49% | — | ×1.180 | 20.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.52% | ÷0.979 | ×1.300 | 2.02% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 4.10 → 5.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 ROKFCL Yankees · 9 IPFIP 1.52 → 2.47 (+0.96)K% 28.1% → 19.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.12% | — | ×0.680 | 19.12% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.25% | — | ×1.250 | 7.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.142 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 128).
Result: FIP 1.52 → 2.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 ROKFCL Yankees · 25 IPFIP 4.16 → 5.40 (+1.23)K% 22.1% → 15.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.14% | — | ×0.680 | 15.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.85% | — | ×1.250 | 24.81% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.76% | ÷1.383 | ×1.400 | 0.77% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 177).
Result: FIP 4.16 → 5.40, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 ROKDSL NYY Yankees · 24 IPFIP 3.25 → 4.97 (+1.72)K% 36.6% → 24.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.61% | — | ×0.680 | 24.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.86% | — | ×1.250 | 22.32% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.79% | ÷1.195 | ×1.400 | 2.09% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 139).
Result: FIP 3.25 → 4.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 0.3 | 34 | 22.1% | 14.5% | 1.16 | 5.09 |
| John Hudek ('99) | 1.0 | 40 | 23.0% | 13.7% | 1.30 | 4.43 |
| Armando Almanza ('05) | 1.1 | 54 | 24.4% | 14.3% | 1.43 | 4.82 |
| Brian Bruney ('12) | 1.3 | 43 | 21.2% | 15.8% | 0.94 | 4.68 |
| Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*) | 1.2 | 40 | 20.0%* | 12.5%* | 0.98* | 4.96* |
| Ed Glynn ('75-'85, -0 WAR*) | 1.3 | 53 | 23.5%* | 12.9%* | 1.22* | 4.69* |
| Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*) | 1.0 | 50 | 21.5%* | 11.9%* | 1.05* | 4.68* |