Jordy Luciano

P Tampa Tarpons
Age 26 RHP 5'10" / 160 lbs A
Overview
APROSPECT
MLB%0%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202221ROKDSL NYY Yanke…150244.503.2736.6%17.9%—K 24.9% · BB 22.3% · FIP 4.97
202322ROKNYY120255.404.4222.1%19.8%—K 15.1% · BB 24.8% · FIP 5.40
202423MIX2 levels380644.953.8924.7%16.3%—K 18.0% · BB 20.6% · FIP 5.30
202524No MLB games played
202625No MLB games played
2027PROJ26MLBNYY——05.125.1222.0%14.7%—
2028PROJ36% MLB27MLBNYY100115.065.0722.1%14.2%-0.1
Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsSam Gardner (age 26) · Nick Ernst (age 25) · Spencer Bivens (age 28)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 130122vR 114
ERA5.12
FIP5.12
K%22.0%
BB%14.7%
K-BB%7.3%
Proj IP38
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 38 IP
K: -0.1 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-0KBB: -2.8 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-3BBCONTACT: -1.1 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-1CONTACTSTAM: +1.6 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+2STAMTotal WAR: -0.25 (38 IP)-0.3WAR
-0.2-0.12728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†5555

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
202221ROK MLEDSL NYY Yankees15024112412020%1.624.9%22.3%2.6%2.1%4.504.97—
202221ROK RAWDSL NYY Yankees15024112412020%1.636.6%17.9%18.7%1.8%4.503.27—
202322ROK MLEFCL Yankees12025131292610%2.115.1%24.8%-9.8%0.8%5.405.40—
202322ROK RAWFCL Yankees12025131292610%2.122.1%19.8%2.3%0.8%5.404.42—
202423MIX MLE2 levels38064295734840%1.718.0%20.6%-2.6%2.0%4.955.30—
202423MIX MLE2 levels38064295734840%1.718.0%20.6%-2.6%2.0%4.955.30—
202423MIX RAW2 levels38064295734840%1.724.7%16.3%8.5%1.4%4.953.89—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202726MLBNYY——0——————22.0%14.7%7.3%3.0%5.125.12—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202827MLB MLENYY28029123271840%1.022.1%14.2%7.9%3.0%5.065.07-0.2
202827MLB CTXNYY100114610710%1.122.1%14.2%7.9%3.0%5.065.07-0.1
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW100114510610%1.122.1%14.2%7.9%3.0%5.064.69-0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW1900200844188113190%1.122.1%14.2%7.9%3.0%5.064.69-0.3
Career— MLE65011353810111890%1.718.7%22.0%-3.3%1.7%4.955.26-0.2
/ 200 IP— MLE1150200955179210170%1.718.7%22.0%-3.3%1.7%4.955.26-1.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2024 ATampa Tarpons · 55 IPFIP 4.10 → 5.30 (+1.21)K% 24.3% → 18.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF24.33%—×0.74018.01%
BB% (unintentional) /BF17.49%—×1.18020.64%
HR / BF /BF1.52%÷0.979×1.3002.02%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).

Result: FIP 4.10 → 5.30, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2024 ROKFCL Yankees · 9 IPFIP 1.52 → 2.47 (+0.96)K% 28.1% → 19.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF28.12%—×0.68019.12%
BB% (unintentional) /BF6.25%—×1.2507.81%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.142×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 128).

Result: FIP 1.52 → 2.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 ROKFCL Yankees · 25 IPFIP 4.16 → 5.40 (+1.23)K% 22.1% → 15.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF22.14%—×0.68015.05%
BB% (unintentional) /BF19.85%—×1.25024.81%
HR / BF /BF0.76%÷1.383×1.4000.77%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 177).

Result: FIP 4.16 → 5.40, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 ROKDSL NYY Yankees · 24 IPFIP 3.25 → 4.97 (+1.72)K% 36.6% → 24.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF36.61%—×0.68024.89%
BB% (unintentional) /BF17.86%—×1.25022.32%
HR / BF /BF1.79%÷1.195×1.4002.09%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 139).

Result: FIP 3.25 → 4.97, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Career Comps

Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.

Player162sIP/yrK%BB%HR/9ERA
OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION0.33422.1%14.5%1.165.09
John Hudek ('99)1.04023.0%13.7%1.304.43
Armando Almanza ('05)1.15424.4%14.3%1.434.82
Brian Bruney ('12)1.34321.2%15.8%0.944.68
Gene Harris ('89-'95, -1 WAR*)1.24020.0%*12.5%*0.98*4.96*
Ed Glynn ('75-'85, -0 WAR*)1.35323.5%*12.9%*1.22*4.69*
Fred Lasher ('63-'71, -1 WAR*)1.05021.5%*11.9%*1.05*4.68*